Evaluation of breeding strategies to reduce the inbreeding rate in the Friesian horse population: Looking back and moving forward

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/jbg.12872
Marije J. Steensma, Harmen P. Doekes, Torsten Pook, Martijn F. L. Derks, Nynke Bakker, Bart J. Ducro
{"title":"Evaluation of breeding strategies to reduce the inbreeding rate in the Friesian horse population: Looking back and moving forward","authors":"Marije J. Steensma,&nbsp;Harmen P. Doekes,&nbsp;Torsten Pook,&nbsp;Martijn F. L. Derks,&nbsp;Nynke Bakker,&nbsp;Bart J. Ducro","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past, small population sizes and unequal ancestor contributions have resulted in high inbreeding rates (Δ<i>F</i>) in the Friesian horse. Two decades ago, the studbook implemented a mating quota and started publishing individual kinships and reduced Δ<i>F</i> below 1% per generation. However, since then, the breeding population size has decreased and this raises the question whether current breeding strategies are sufficient to keep Δ<i>F</i> below desired rates. The aim of this study was to (1) reflect on past inbreeding trends and their main determinants, using pedigree analysis and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the current and additional breeding strategies using stochastic simulations. We estimated the current Δ<i>F</i> (2013–2022) at 0.72% per generation. While the total contribution of the top 10 sires to the number of offspring per year has decreased from 75% in 1980 to 35% in 2022, this was mainly due to an increased number of approved studbook sires, and not due to more equalized contributions among sires. Of the simulated breeding strategies, selecting only breeding stallions with a below average mean kinship (i.e., “mean kinship selection”) was most effective to decrease Δ<i>F</i> (from 0.66% to 0.33%). Increasing the number of breeding sires only had an effect when also a mating quota was applied. However, its effect remained limited. For example, a ~1.5 fold increase, combined with a mating quota of 80 offspring per sire per year, reduced Δ<i>F</i> from 0.55% to 0.51%. When increasing the number of breeding mares, a practically unfeasible large increase was needed for a meaningful reduction in Δ<i>F</i> (e.g. twice as many mares were needed to reduce Δ<i>F</i> from 0.66% to 0.56%). Stratified mating quotas, a novel approach in which we assigned each sire a mating quota (of 60, 80, 100 or 120 offspring per year) based on its mean kinship to recently born foals, resulted in a lower Δ<i>F</i> (0.43%) than a general mating quota of 90 offspring per sire per year (0.55%). Overall, while the current Δ<i>F</i> is below 1%, we recommend to implement additional strategies to further reduce Δ<i>F</i> below 0.5% in the Friesian horse population. For this breed and similar populations, we recommend to focus on breeding strategies based on kinship levels to effectively reduce Δ<i>F</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":"141 6","pages":"668-684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbg.12872","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbg.12872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past, small population sizes and unequal ancestor contributions have resulted in high inbreeding rates (ΔF) in the Friesian horse. Two decades ago, the studbook implemented a mating quota and started publishing individual kinships and reduced ΔF below 1% per generation. However, since then, the breeding population size has decreased and this raises the question whether current breeding strategies are sufficient to keep ΔF below desired rates. The aim of this study was to (1) reflect on past inbreeding trends and their main determinants, using pedigree analysis and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the current and additional breeding strategies using stochastic simulations. We estimated the current ΔF (2013–2022) at 0.72% per generation. While the total contribution of the top 10 sires to the number of offspring per year has decreased from 75% in 1980 to 35% in 2022, this was mainly due to an increased number of approved studbook sires, and not due to more equalized contributions among sires. Of the simulated breeding strategies, selecting only breeding stallions with a below average mean kinship (i.e., “mean kinship selection”) was most effective to decrease ΔF (from 0.66% to 0.33%). Increasing the number of breeding sires only had an effect when also a mating quota was applied. However, its effect remained limited. For example, a ~1.5 fold increase, combined with a mating quota of 80 offspring per sire per year, reduced ΔF from 0.55% to 0.51%. When increasing the number of breeding mares, a practically unfeasible large increase was needed for a meaningful reduction in ΔF (e.g. twice as many mares were needed to reduce ΔF from 0.66% to 0.56%). Stratified mating quotas, a novel approach in which we assigned each sire a mating quota (of 60, 80, 100 or 120 offspring per year) based on its mean kinship to recently born foals, resulted in a lower ΔF (0.43%) than a general mating quota of 90 offspring per sire per year (0.55%). Overall, while the current ΔF is below 1%, we recommend to implement additional strategies to further reduce ΔF below 0.5% in the Friesian horse population. For this breed and similar populations, we recommend to focus on breeding strategies based on kinship levels to effectively reduce ΔF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低弗里斯兰马近亲繁殖率的育种策略评估:回顾过去,展望未来。
过去,由于种群规模小、祖先贡献不均,导致弗里斯兰马的近亲繁殖率(ΔF)很高。二十年前,种马场实施了交配限额,并开始公布个体亲缘关系,从而将每一代的ΔF降至1%以下。然而,从那时起,繁殖种群的数量就开始减少,这就提出了一个问题,即目前的繁殖策略是否足以将ΔF控制在理想的比率以下。本研究的目的是:(1) 利用血统分析反思过去的近亲繁殖趋势及其主要决定因素;(2) 利用随机模拟评估当前和其他育种策略的有效性。我们估计目前的ΔF(2013-2022 年)为每代 0.72%。虽然排名前 10 位的种公牛对每年后代数量的总贡献率从 1980 年的 75% 降至 2022 年的 35%,但这主要是由于批准的种公牛数量增加,而不是由于种公牛之间的贡献率更加均衡。在模拟育种策略中,仅选择平均亲缘关系低于平均值的种公马(即 "平均亲缘关系选择")对降低ΔF最为有效(从 0.66% 降至 0.33%)。只有在采用交配配额的情况下,增加种公猪的数量才有效果。然而,其效果仍然有限。例如,增加约 1.5 倍,再加上每头公马每年 80 个后代的交配配额,可将ΔF 从 0.55% 降至 0.51%。当增加繁殖母马的数量时,要使 ΔF 有意义地降低,需要大量增加繁殖母马的数量,这实际上是不可行的(例如,要将ΔF 从 0.66% 降低到 0.56%,需要两倍的繁殖母马数量)。分层交配配额是一种新方法,我们根据每头公马与新近出生马驹的平均亲缘关系为其分配交配配额(每年60、80、100或120头后代),结果ΔF(0.43%)低于每头公马每年90头后代的一般交配配额(0.55%)。总体而言,虽然目前的ΔF 低于 1%,但我们建议实施更多策略,进一步将弗里斯兰马种群中的ΔF 降低到 0.5% 以下。对于该品种和类似种群,我们建议重点关注基于亲缘关系水平的育种策略,以有效降低ΔF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
期刊最新文献
Genomic Diversity of U.S. Katahdin Hair Sheep. The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study. Genomic Prediction Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Australian Angus Cattle. Genetic Characterisation of Feeding Patterns in Lactating Holstein Cows and Their Association With Feed Efficiency Traits. Methods of Calculating Prediction Error Variance and Prediction Accuracy for Restricted Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Breeding Values.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1