Psychometric evaluation of Suicide Management Competency Scale for nursing students: A cross-sectional study

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/inm.13348
Chueh-Fen Lu, Jason W. Beckstead, Jia-You Ye, Chiu Yueh Yang
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of Suicide Management Competency Scale for nursing students: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Chueh-Fen Lu,&nbsp;Jason W. Beckstead,&nbsp;Jia-You Ye,&nbsp;Chiu Yueh Yang","doi":"10.1111/inm.13348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Suicide management skills are essential for nursing students, as they are often the initial healthcare contact for individuals at risk of suicide. Recognising signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour is critical for initiating timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and access the psychometric evaluation of the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS) for nursing students. A first draft of the SMCS was initially developed following literature and focus group, and a scale containing 28 items was constructed. We recruited 216 participants from two nursing schools. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency reliability was determined with Cronbach's alpha, and test–retest reliability was examined with intra-class correlation. After four rounds of EFA and item analysis, we reduced the number of items to 16. We deleted 12 items, including 4 items for communalities less than 0.40, 3 items for cross-loading, 3 items for factor loading less than 0.40, and 2 items for low corrected item–total correlation. The final 16-item SMCS resulted in three subscales, which explained 55.813% of the total variance: emotional challenges in suicide risk assessment, delivering suicide interventions, and suicide risk nursing competence and confidence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.854 for the total score and 0.748 to 0.847 for the subscales. The newly developed SMCS was found to have good reliability and validity, suggesting that this scale could be used to evaluate nursing students' perceived competency in managing suicide, which might help cultivate competence in nurses' ability to effectively manage and prevent suicide, thus contributing to saving lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.13348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide management skills are essential for nursing students, as they are often the initial healthcare contact for individuals at risk of suicide. Recognising signs of suicidal ideation and behaviour is critical for initiating timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and access the psychometric evaluation of the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS) for nursing students. A first draft of the SMCS was initially developed following literature and focus group, and a scale containing 28 items was constructed. We recruited 216 participants from two nursing schools. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency reliability was determined with Cronbach's alpha, and test–retest reliability was examined with intra-class correlation. After four rounds of EFA and item analysis, we reduced the number of items to 16. We deleted 12 items, including 4 items for communalities less than 0.40, 3 items for cross-loading, 3 items for factor loading less than 0.40, and 2 items for low corrected item–total correlation. The final 16-item SMCS resulted in three subscales, which explained 55.813% of the total variance: emotional challenges in suicide risk assessment, delivering suicide interventions, and suicide risk nursing competence and confidence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.854 for the total score and 0.748 to 0.847 for the subscales. The newly developed SMCS was found to have good reliability and validity, suggesting that this scale could be used to evaluate nursing students' perceived competency in managing suicide, which might help cultivate competence in nurses' ability to effectively manage and prevent suicide, thus contributing to saving lives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生自杀管理能力量表的心理测量学评估:横断面研究
自杀管理技能对护理专业学生来说至关重要,因为他们往往是有自杀风险的人最初接触的医护人员。识别自杀意念和行为的迹象对于及时启动干预措施至关重要。本研究旨在为护理专业学生开发自杀管理能力量表(SMCS),并对其进行心理测量评估。根据文献和焦点小组的意见,我们初步制定了 SMCS 的初稿,并构建了包含 28 个项目的量表。我们从两所护理学校招募了 216 名参与者。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)评估了结构效度。用 Cronbach's alpha 测定了内部一致性可靠性,用类内相关性检验了测试-再测可靠性。经过四轮 EFA 和项目分析,我们将项目数减少到 16 个。我们删除了 12 个项目,其中 4 个项目的公因子小于 0.40,3 个项目存在交叉负荷,3 个项目的因子负荷小于 0.40,2 个项目的校正项-总相关性较低。最后,16 个项目的 SMCS 形成了三个子量表,解释了总方差的 55.813%:自杀风险评估中的情绪挑战、提供自杀干预、自杀风险护理能力和信心。总分的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.854,各分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.748 至 0.847。研究发现,新开发的SMCS具有良好的信度和效度,表明该量表可用于评价护生对自杀管理的认知能力,有助于培养护士有效管理和预防自杀的能力,从而为挽救生命做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Recognising and responding to loneliness in older people Professional Quality of Life Among Mental Health Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Effects of Psychoeducation on Caregivers of Individuals Experiencing Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Emergency Department Use Following Self‐Harm and Suicide Ideation: An Analysis of the Influence of Cultural and/or Linguistic Diversity Using Data From the Self‐Harm Monitoring System for Victoria (2012–2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1