Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)] by Giacomo Bonan (review)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Technology and Culture Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1353/tech.2024.a926345
Marco Bertilorenzi
{"title":"Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)] by Giacomo Bonan (review)","authors":"Marco Bertilorenzi","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)]</em> by Giacomo Bonan <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Marco Bertilorenzi (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)]</em> By Giacomo Bonan. Rome: Viella, 2020. Pp. 182. <p>In his compelling book <em>Le acque agitate della patria</em>, Giacomo Bonan recounts the historical process of the industrialization of the Piave River, which flows from the Dolomite Alps down to the Adriatic Sea. The Piave Valley became one of the most developed hydropower-generation regions in Europe, with dozens of power stations, artificial lakes, pipes and channels, dams, and barrages, which were progressively built between the late nineteenth century and the early 1960s. The Vajont Dam is perhaps one of the best-known technological structures in the area, both because it is a true feat of engineering (standing at a height of 860 feet, it is still the highest dam in Europe) and because of the tragedy that originated from a landslide that flooded the Vajont Valley on October 9, 1963, causing the death of about 2,000 people. The Vajont is only a part of the complex system of integrated water infrastructures created in order to exploit the natural resources of the region by public and private actors seeking to promote the \"integrated\" development of the region. According to Bonan, business interests, technocracies, and technological dreams underpinned the industrialization of the river with some consistency, despite the institutional changes that occurred during the course of Italian history: the liberal monarchy before World War I, fascism in the interwar period, and the democratic republic after-ward. During the second half of the 1960s, the hydropower development of the region was brought to an end, leaving a territory deeply transformed by this \"integral\" industrialization, and Italy switched to other energy sources, such as oil and gas.</p> <p>Against this backdrop, the historian of technology could well be interested in underscoring the dynamics that, thanks to opportunities opened by innovations of the electric age, led to a radical transformation of an extensive region. By adopting from the works of Sara Pritchard the concept of \"environmental system\" to describe the Piave River, Bonan offers a multilevel analysis of the industrialization of the area, exploring the complex nexus that existed between different actors involved in the exploitation of a huge water infrastructure like the Piave River. Such analysis shows how the environment, technology, and economy are linked: from being a river used for wood transportation and irrigation in the past, the Piave gradually underwent new economic and technological development in the late nineteenth century, when the water of the river became a huge target for both investments of electrical companies and public policies. <strong>[End Page 724]</strong></p> <p>Relying on a vast corpus of documents, from both national and local archives and from business and administrative collections, Bonan explains that industrialization was characterized by the ability of the promoters of the various projects, in particular the private company Società Adriatica di Elettricità (SADE)—Italy's leading electric utility before the nationalization of electricity in 1962—to present them as being of the utmost importance for the national interest. The limits between private and public interests were blurred: while the political power of SADE was substantial (SADE's president, Giuseppe Volpi, was finance minister under Mussolini's government between 1925 and 1928), the state was an important supporter of private interests before the nationalization of energy. As in many other cases, large infrastructures and big modifications in landscapes and energy transition needed more than economic motivations, like nationalism, and followed technological dreams that were able to support private interests. Behind the common vision of its promoters, however, the industrialization of the Piave River also reveals a controversy between different economic and technological interests, which was gradually overcome during the economic development of the region, leading to a kind of energy transition as more local and less technological interests were downsized.</p> Marco Bertilorenzi <p>Marco Bertilorenzi is associate professor in economic history at the University of Padua. His research interests include history of electrometallurgy...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)] by Giacomo Bonan
  • Marco Bertilorenzi (bio)
Le acque agitate della patria: L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882–1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland: The industrialization of the Piave River (1882–1966)] By Giacomo Bonan. Rome: Viella, 2020. Pp. 182.

In his compelling book Le acque agitate della patria, Giacomo Bonan recounts the historical process of the industrialization of the Piave River, which flows from the Dolomite Alps down to the Adriatic Sea. The Piave Valley became one of the most developed hydropower-generation regions in Europe, with dozens of power stations, artificial lakes, pipes and channels, dams, and barrages, which were progressively built between the late nineteenth century and the early 1960s. The Vajont Dam is perhaps one of the best-known technological structures in the area, both because it is a true feat of engineering (standing at a height of 860 feet, it is still the highest dam in Europe) and because of the tragedy that originated from a landslide that flooded the Vajont Valley on October 9, 1963, causing the death of about 2,000 people. The Vajont is only a part of the complex system of integrated water infrastructures created in order to exploit the natural resources of the region by public and private actors seeking to promote the "integrated" development of the region. According to Bonan, business interests, technocracies, and technological dreams underpinned the industrialization of the river with some consistency, despite the institutional changes that occurred during the course of Italian history: the liberal monarchy before World War I, fascism in the interwar period, and the democratic republic after-ward. During the second half of the 1960s, the hydropower development of the region was brought to an end, leaving a territory deeply transformed by this "integral" industrialization, and Italy switched to other energy sources, such as oil and gas.

Against this backdrop, the historian of technology could well be interested in underscoring the dynamics that, thanks to opportunities opened by innovations of the electric age, led to a radical transformation of an extensive region. By adopting from the works of Sara Pritchard the concept of "environmental system" to describe the Piave River, Bonan offers a multilevel analysis of the industrialization of the area, exploring the complex nexus that existed between different actors involved in the exploitation of a huge water infrastructure like the Piave River. Such analysis shows how the environment, technology, and economy are linked: from being a river used for wood transportation and irrigation in the past, the Piave gradually underwent new economic and technological development in the late nineteenth century, when the water of the river became a huge target for both investments of electrical companies and public policies. [End Page 724]

Relying on a vast corpus of documents, from both national and local archives and from business and administrative collections, Bonan explains that industrialization was characterized by the ability of the promoters of the various projects, in particular the private company Società Adriatica di Elettricità (SADE)—Italy's leading electric utility before the nationalization of electricity in 1962—to present them as being of the utmost importance for the national interest. The limits between private and public interests were blurred: while the political power of SADE was substantial (SADE's president, Giuseppe Volpi, was finance minister under Mussolini's government between 1925 and 1928), the state was an important supporter of private interests before the nationalization of energy. As in many other cases, large infrastructures and big modifications in landscapes and energy transition needed more than economic motivations, like nationalism, and followed technological dreams that were able to support private interests. Behind the common vision of its promoters, however, the industrialization of the Piave River also reveals a controversy between different economic and technological interests, which was gradually overcome during the economic development of the region, leading to a kind of energy transition as more local and less technological interests were downsized.

Marco Bertilorenzi

Marco Bertilorenzi is associate professor in economic history at the University of Padua. His research interests include history of electrometallurgy...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le acque agitate della patria:L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882-1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland:皮亚韦河的工业化(1882-1966 年)],贾科莫-博南著(评论)
评论者 Le acque agitate della patria:L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882-1966) [The troubled waters of the homeland:皮亚韦河的工业化(1882-1966 年)] Giacomo Bonan Marco Bertilorenzi (bio) 著 Le acque agitate della patria:L'industrializzazione del Piave (1882-1966)[《祖国的不安之水:皮亚韦河的工业化(1882-1966 年)》]:皮亚韦河的工业化(1882-1966 年]贾科莫-博南著。罗马:维埃拉,2020 年。Pp.182.在其引人入胜的著作《Le acque agitate della patria》中,贾科莫-博南讲述了皮亚韦河工业化的历史进程,皮亚韦河从多洛米蒂阿尔卑斯山一直流向亚得里亚海。皮亚韦河谷成为欧洲水力发电最发达的地区之一,从十九世纪末到二十世纪六十年代初,这里逐步建成了数十座发电站、人工湖、管道和渠道、水坝和拦河坝。瓦戎特大坝可能是该地区最著名的技术建筑之一,因为它是一项真正的工程壮举(坝高 860 英尺,至今仍是欧洲最高的大坝),也因为 1963 年 10 月 9 日发生的山体滑坡导致瓦戎特山谷洪水泛滥,造成约 2000 人死亡的悲剧。为了开发该地区的自然资源,公共和私人行为者都在努力促进该地区的 "一体化 "发展,而瓦翁特水坝只是这一复杂的综合水利基础设施系统的一部分。根据博南的观点,尽管在意大利历史进程中发生了制度变革:第一次世界大战前的自由君主制、战时的法西斯主义和战后的民主共和国,但商业利益、技术政体和技术梦想在某种程度上始终支撑着河流的工业化。20 世纪 60 年代后半期,该地区的水电开发告一段落,留下了被这种 "整体 "工业化深深改变的领土,意大利转而使用石油和天然气等其他能源。在此背景下,技术史学家很有兴趣强调电力时代的创新所带来的机遇,导致一个广阔地区发生根本性转变的动力。博南从萨拉-普里查德(Sara Pritchard)的著作中借鉴了 "环境系统 "的概念来描述皮亚韦河,对该地区的工业化进行了多层次的分析,探讨了参与开发像皮亚韦河这样巨大的水利基础设施的不同参与者之间存在的复杂关系。这种分析表明了环境、技术和经济之间的联系:皮亚韦河从过去一条用于木材运输和灌溉的河流,到 19 世纪末逐渐经历了新的经济和技术发展,河水成为电力公司和公共政策投资的巨大目标。[博南依靠大量来自国家和地方档案以及企业和行政部门收藏的文件,解释了工业化的特点是各种项目的推动者,特别是私营公司亚得里亚海电力公司(SADE)--1962 年电力国有化之前意大利主要的电力公司--有能力将这些项目说成是对国家利益最重要的项目。私人利益与公共利益之间的界限模糊不清:虽然 SADE 的政治权力很大(SADE 的总裁朱塞佩-沃尔皮曾在 1925 年至 1928 年间担任墨索里尼政府的财政部长),但在能源国有化之前,国家是私人利益的重要支持者。与其他许多情况一样,大型基础设施和地貌大改造以及能源转型需要的不仅仅是民族主义等经济动机,而是能够支持私人利益的技术梦想。然而,在其推动者的共同愿景背后,皮亚韦河的工业化也揭示了不同经济和技术利益之间的争论,这种争论在该地区的经济发展过程中逐渐被克服,导致了一种能源转型,因为更多的地方利益和较少的技术利益被缩小了。Marco Bertilorenzi Marco Bertilorenzi 是帕多瓦大学经济史副教授。他的研究兴趣包括电冶金史......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
期刊最新文献
Hollywood's Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe by Ross Melnick (review) Communications in Turkey and the Ottoman Empire: A Critical History by Burçe Çelik (review) Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack (review) Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller (review) Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1