首页 > 最新文献

Technology and Culture最新文献

英文 中文
Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller (review) 集体智慧:Anna Marie Roos 和 Vera Keller 编著的《早期现代学院的收藏》(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933117
Aurélien Ruellet

Reviewed by:

  • Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller
  • Aurélien Ruellet (bio)
Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy
Edited by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022. Pp. 323.

In January 1742, a mummified ibis was presented at a meeting of the Egyptian Society in London, then carefully dissected a few days later. During another session, a mummy was opened by one of the members, Charles Pococke, who made hypotheses regarding the chemical components of the pigments used for coffins as well as the embalmment techniques. This is one of the numerous narratives that are scattered throughout the volume Collective Wisdom, edited by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller, the result of three conferences that brought together scholars from different countries and thematic horizons.

At the core of most of the eleven contributions, finely put in a wider historiographical perspective by the introduction, lays the question of the circulation of objects and the building of collections within the learned societies of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Ingeniously referred to as “collective wisdom,” the focus of the book is on “the knowledge gained from studying collections . . . and the collections generated through objectbased study and exchange (archives, correspondence, journals)” (p. 16). The chapters are not about the birth of museums, but rather about the way collections, sometimes heterogeneous, composed of antiquities as much as of natural specimens, were circulated among equally heterogeneous social grounds, involving physicians, surgeons, quacks, merchants, and apothecaries, and how those objects were the support of an intellectual interest that was not confined to curiosity. The geographic focus is on central and northern Europe, with chapters devoted to the Leopoldina, which held its meetings in Halle; the Spalding Gentlemen Society in Lincolnshire (SGS); the multifarious activities of the collector and professor Ole Worm in Copenhagen; the uses of objects and collections in pedagogic activities inspired by Comenius; or learned circles in the commercial cities of Frankfurt/Main and Dantzig.

The historian of technology will find many points of interest: besides the discussions of technical objects (like the “roman lamp”—actually a medieval Jewish lamp used for Sabbath—that Hans Sloane offered to the Society of Antiquaries) or technical processes (see for example the chapter by C. Grell on the metrological works of Burratini in Egypt), the contributions shed light on a series of technologies of knowledge management in those learned societies. The reader can appreciate, thanks to many illustrations in color, extracts from the minute book of the SGS: its entries, pointing at the presence of an object during a session, also gave

评论者: 集体智慧:由 Anna Marie Roos 和 Vera Keller 编辑的《早期现代学院的收藏》 Aurélien Ruellet (bio) Collective Wisdom:由 Anna Marie Roos 和 Vera Keller 编辑。Turnhout:Brepols,2022 年。Pp.323.1742 年 1 月,一具朱鹮木乃伊在伦敦埃及学会的一次会议上展出,几天后被仔细解剖。在另一次会议上,查尔斯-波克(Charles Pococke)打开了一具木乃伊,并就棺木所用颜料的化学成分以及防腐技术提出了假设。安娜-玛丽-罗斯(Anna Marie Roos)和维拉-凯勒(Vera Keller)编著的《集体智慧》一书中散落着大量叙述,这是三次会议的成果之一,来自不同国家和不同主题领域的学者汇聚一堂。导言从更广阔的历史学视角对 11 篇文章中的大部分进行了细化,其核心问题是十七和十八世纪学术团体内部的物品流通和藏书建设。本书被巧妙地称为 "集体智慧",其重点是 "从研究藏品中获得的知识......以及通过物品产生的藏品"。......以及通过基于对象的研究和交流(档案、通信、期刊)而产生的收藏"(第 16 页)。书中的章节并不是关于博物馆的诞生,而是关于藏品(有时是异质的,由古物和自然标本组成)在同样异质的社会环境中流通的方式,包括内科医生、外科医生、庸医、商人和药剂师,以及这些物品是如何支撑起一种不局限于好奇心的知识兴趣的。该书的地域重点是中欧和北欧,其中一些章节专门介绍了在哈勒举行会议的利奥波德协会、林肯郡的斯伯丁绅士协会(SGS)、哥本哈根收藏家兼教授奥勒-沃姆的各种活动、受夸美纽斯启发而在教学活动中使用的物品和藏品,以及法兰克福/美因和丹齐格等商业城市的学术界。技术史学家会发现许多有趣之处:除了对技术物品(如汉斯-斯隆提供给古董商协会的 "罗马灯"--实际上是一盏中世纪犹太人用于安息日的灯)或技术流程(例如,参见 C. Grell 关于埃及布尔拉蒂尼的计量学著作的章节)的讨论外,文章还揭示了这些学术团体中的一系列知识管理技术。通过许多彩色插图,读者可以欣赏到 SGS 会议记录簿的摘录:其中的条目指出了某一物品在会议期间的存在,还提供了有关其来源和提供者的信息,以及与其他条目的交叉参考,有时还配有逼真的图画。这种 "虚拟见证 "装置与博物馆图 [完 第 1021 页] 像相结合,使会员们能够方便地获取物品,并方便在协会会议期间查阅或展示这些物品。好奇心文化并不反对实验性方法:《古玩杂记》(利奥波德会的会刊)试图在展示标本(往往是奇特或畸形的标本)与学术论文(以博学和怀疑精神为基础的评论)之间达成一种平衡,二者在文字编排上有明显的区别。因此,以医生为核心成员的学术团体追溯了认识论和社会的界限,与药剂师、助产士或江湖术士等信息传播者保持距离,同时批判性地整合他们的贡献。现代早期科学史家将会对发掘连接这种集体智慧和科学成就的知名场所的纽带感兴趣,这些纽带以通信或书籍和物品交换的形式出现,例如皇家学会和其中一些学会之间的通信或书籍和物品交换。路易西安-费里埃(Louisiane Ferlier)总结性的一章从历史的角度恰当地阐述了如何对这些集体智慧的文本进行整理、分类、出版,以及如何让读者获取这些文本的问题。现在,所有这些操作都实现了数字化;错误的危险取代了吞噬文本的害虫的危险;技术选择更多地与选择观看软件有关,而不是与位置有关......
{"title":"Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller (review)","authors":"Aurélien Ruellet","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933117","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy</em> ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Aurélien Ruellet (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy</em><br/> Edited by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022. Pp. 323. <p>In January 1742, a mummified ibis was presented at a meeting of the Egyptian Society in London, then carefully dissected a few days later. During another session, a mummy was opened by one of the members, Charles Pococke, who made hypotheses regarding the chemical components of the pigments used for coffins as well as the embalmment techniques. This is one of the numerous narratives that are scattered throughout the volume <em>Collective Wisdom</em>, edited by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller, the result of three conferences that brought together scholars from different countries and thematic horizons.</p> <p>At the core of most of the eleven contributions, finely put in a wider historiographical perspective by the introduction, lays the question of the circulation of objects and the building of collections within the learned societies of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Ingeniously referred to as “collective wisdom,” the focus of the book is on “the knowledge gained from studying collections . . . and the collections generated through objectbased study and exchange (archives, correspondence, journals)” (p. 16). The chapters are not about the birth of museums, but rather about the way collections, sometimes heterogeneous, composed of antiquities as much as of natural specimens, were circulated among equally heterogeneous social grounds, involving physicians, surgeons, quacks, merchants, and apothecaries, and how those objects were the support of an intellectual interest that was not confined to curiosity. The geographic focus is on central and northern Europe, with chapters devoted to the Leopoldina, which held its meetings in Halle; the Spalding Gentlemen Society in Lincolnshire (SGS); the multifarious activities of the collector and professor Ole Worm in Copenhagen; the uses of objects and collections in pedagogic activities inspired by Comenius; or learned circles in the commercial cities of Frankfurt/Main and Dantzig.</p> <p>The historian of technology will find many points of interest: besides the discussions of technical objects (like the “roman lamp”—actually a medieval Jewish lamp used for Sabbath—that Hans Sloane offered to the Society of Antiquaries) or technical processes (see for example the chapter by C. Grell on the metrological works of Burratini in Egypt), the contributions shed light on a series of technologies of knowledge management in those learned societies. The reader can appreciate, thanks to many illustrations in color, extracts from the minute book of the SGS: its entries, pointing at the presence of an object during a session, also gave ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microhistories of Technology: Making the World by Mikael Hård (review) 技术的微观历史:Mikael Hård撰写的《创造世界》(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933103
Corinna R. Unger

Reviewed by:

  • Microhistories of Technology: Making the World by Mikael Hård
  • Corinna R. Unger (bio)
Microhistories of Technology: Making the World
By Mikael Hård. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. Pp. xx + 290.

In the preface to his new book, Mikael Hård describes how his approach to the history of technology has evolved over the decades. He started out with a conviction that nineteenth- and twentieth-century history could be captured by terms like industrialization and mechanization. Later, though, he came to argue that those concepts were too abstract to do justice to the complexity of history. He then became interested in the notion of globalization but questioned its macroperspective, which tended to hide particularities from historical view. His new book documents in impressive ways how the history of technology has evolved as a field, and it shows the exciting avenues open to historians of technology today.

In his book on microhistories of technology, Hård demonstrates the richness of technologies that individuals and communities across the world have used and, in part, continue to use in their everyday lives. His understanding of technology is notably broad and informed by methods borrowed from microhistory, social history, cultural history, and gender history. The volume, which covers the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, contains chapters on carpentry and construction work, communication via drums, sugar production, electricity networks, housing, cooking, beer brewing, and menstruation pads. In terms of geographic range, the chapters cover today’s Indonesia, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Ghana, northern India, Tanzania, Argentina, Kenya, Uzbekistan, and South Korea. Referring to nation-states is somewhat misleading, though, as Hård is less interested in national structures than in local and regional phenomena. By drawing on historical cases, he highlights the variety of technological knowledge related to all aspects of life.

For example, by using European travel accounts and ethnographic studies from the nineteenth century and complementing them with contemporary literature, Hård emphasizes how well adapted the so-called Indigenous building techniques in Indonesia and sugar production techniques in India were to local climatic and economic conditions. Furthermore, he underlines that [End Page 994] Europeans acknowledged and admired local practices and incorporated them into their own work, just as representatives of local communities were eager to learn about practices Europeans brought with them. Hård thereby shows how an in-depth analysis of a specific technology in situ can allow historians to speak to broader questions about the nature of colonial relations.

Hård does not question the fact that colonial relations were unequal and exploitative, or that they were anchored in racist and

评论者: 技术微观史:技术的微观历史:创造世界》,作者:Mikael Hård Corinna R. Unger(简历):技术微观史:创造世界 作者:Mikael Hård。贝辛斯托克:帕尔格雷夫-麦克米伦出版社,2023 年。第 xx + 290 页。Mikael Hård在新书序言中介绍了他几十年来对技术史研究方法的演变过程。一开始,他坚信工业化和机械化等术语可以概括十九世纪和二十世纪的历史。但后来,他开始认为这些概念过于抽象,无法反映历史的复杂性。随后,他对全球化的概念产生了兴趣,但对其宏观视角提出了质疑,因为这种视角往往会掩盖历史的特殊性。他的新书以令人印象深刻的方式记录了技术史作为一个领域是如何演变的,并展示了当今技术史学家所能开辟的令人兴奋的道路。在这本关于技术微观史的书中,霍德展示了世界各地的个人和社区在日常生活中曾经使用过、并且在一定程度上仍在继续使用的丰富技术。他对技术的理解非常广泛,并借鉴了微观史、社会史、文化史和性别史的方法。该书涵盖了十九世纪和二十世纪的内容,包括木工和建筑工作、鼓声通讯、制糖、电力网络、住房、烹饪、啤酒酿造和月经垫等章节。就地域范围而言,这些章节涵盖了今天的印度尼西亚、科特迪瓦、尼日利亚、加纳、印度北部、坦桑尼亚、阿根廷、肯尼亚、乌兹别克斯坦和韩国。不过,提及民族国家有些误导,因为霍德对国家结构的兴趣不如对地方和区域现象的兴趣大。通过借鉴历史案例,他强调了与生活各个方面相关的技术知识的多样性。例如,通过利用十九世纪欧洲的旅行记录和人种学研究,并辅以当代文献,霍德强调了印度尼西亚的所谓土著建筑技术和印度的制糖技术是如何适应当地的气候和经济条件。此外,他还强调 [完 994 页] 欧洲人承认并推崇当地的做法,并将其融入自己的工作中,正如当地社区的代表渴望学习欧洲人带来的做法一样。因此,霍德展示了对某项具体技术的深入分析如何让历史学家能够就殖民关系的性质提出更广泛的问题。哈尔德并没有质疑殖民关系是不平等和剥削性的,也没有质疑殖民关系植根于种族主义和性别歧视的假设。他也没有将土著习俗、贫困或暴力浪漫化。但他表明,那种认为欧洲人或西方人对土著知识不屑一顾、根除现有方法并用自己的方法取而代之的观点过于简单化。例如,他发现美国公司在推销月经垫和卫生棉条时面临重重障碍,这就对二战后韩国社会 "美国化 "的假设提出了质疑。长期以来,韩国妇女一直使用自制的月经垫,她们的穿着习惯与高洁丝等公司销售的产品并不一致。因此,韩国的月经用品行业逐渐发展起来,在韩国妇女的生活方式和行为不断变化的同时,该行业也在销售适应韩国妇女习惯的产品。这表明,"现代化 "等概念的使用需要非常谨慎,对西方技术普及力量的假设也应加以完善。书中介绍的每个章节都非常有趣,很容易就能就这一主题写成一整本书,而霍德也积极努力地为每种现象提供尽可能多的信息。在某些情况下,这导致了描述性的叙述,包含了比严格意义上的必要更多的特定方面的细节。并非所有章节都有结论,有时结尾相当突兀,让读者不知道该如何看待某一现象。在此背景下,霍德提供的结论章节非常有价值,它将不同的线索串联在一起,强调了他的主要发现,并将它们与正在进行的历史学讨论联系起来。例如,他提出了一个清晰的论点...
{"title":"Microhistories of Technology: Making the World by Mikael Hård (review)","authors":"Corinna R. Unger","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933103","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Microhistories of Technology: Making the World</em> by Mikael Hård <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Corinna R. Unger (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Microhistories of Technology: Making the World</em><br/> By Mikael Hård. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. Pp. xx + 290. <p>In the preface to his new book, Mikael Hård describes how his approach to the history of technology has evolved over the decades. He started out with a conviction that nineteenth- and twentieth-century history could be captured by terms like industrialization and mechanization. Later, though, he came to argue that those concepts were too abstract to do justice to the complexity of history. He then became interested in the notion of globalization but questioned its macroperspective, which tended to hide particularities from historical view. His new book documents in impressive ways how the history of technology has evolved as a field, and it shows the exciting avenues open to historians of technology today.</p> <p>In his book on microhistories of technology, Hård demonstrates the richness of technologies that individuals and communities across the world have used and, in part, continue to use in their everyday lives. His understanding of technology is notably broad and informed by methods borrowed from microhistory, social history, cultural history, and gender history. The volume, which covers the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, contains chapters on carpentry and construction work, communication via drums, sugar production, electricity networks, housing, cooking, beer brewing, and menstruation pads. In terms of geographic range, the chapters cover today’s Indonesia, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Ghana, northern India, Tanzania, Argentina, Kenya, Uzbekistan, and South Korea. Referring to nation-states is somewhat misleading, though, as Hård is less interested in national structures than in local and regional phenomena. By drawing on historical cases, he highlights the variety of technological knowledge related to all aspects of life.</p> <p>For example, by using European travel accounts and ethnographic studies from the nineteenth century and complementing them with contemporary literature, Hård emphasizes how well adapted the so-called Indigenous building techniques in Indonesia and sugar production techniques in India were to local climatic and economic conditions. Furthermore, he underlines that <strong>[End Page 994]</strong> Europeans acknowledged and admired local practices and incorporated them into their own work, just as representatives of local communities were eager to learn about practices Europeans brought with them. Hård thereby shows how an in-depth analysis of a specific technology in situ can allow historians to speak to broader questions about the nature of colonial relations.</p> <p>Hård does not question the fact that colonial relations were unequal and exploitative, or that they were anchored in racist and ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving Crops and the Scales of History by Francesca Bray et al (review) 弗朗西斯卡-布雷(Francesca Bray)等人撰写的《移动作物与历史的尺度》(评论
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933105
Harro Maat

Reviewed by:

  • Moving Crops and the Scales of History by Francesca Bray et al
  • Harro Maat (bio)
Moving Crops and the Scales of History
By Francesca Bray, Barbara Hahn, John Bosco Lourdusamy, and Tiago Saraiva. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2023. Pp. 352.

Four renowned historians of technology have delivered a wonderful and inspiring collection of crop histories. The book is important for more than just that. While the heart of Moving Crops is historic, stringing together a wealth of cases from different parts of the world, its central purpose is conceptual and historiographic: to demonstrate that much of the existing global history of crops, materials, and technology more generally is distorted.

Indeed, crops are the central topic to present a new approach to material artifacts and commodities that, as the authors put it, are the stuff of rooted global history. The choice for crops is for a purpose. Inspired by the French Annales school historians focusing on landscapes, the authors present the cropscape as the leading concept.

The methodological depth of the cropscape is convincingly explained, which is not to suggest the reader has to plow through abstract elaborations. A major reason the book is such a great read is the way critique, method, and principles are grafted onto concrete cases, presented as “riffs,” underlining the lively and entertaining style by which the crop stories are told. The introduction chapter needs only a handful of pages to set the stage for the first of these stories, portraying the centrality of crops in the transformation of the Cuban landscape and society through the works of two Cuban writers.

At this point the authors add an important critique. Most histories involving Cuba and crops almost inevitably give prominence to Sidney Mintz. He’s not called on stage for the opening riff, where Cuban writers perform with equal verve. This is a returning pattern in the book and brings less familiar authors and unexpected twists to the crop stories. Blended with renowned Western scholars—Mintz is sampled at various other points—the aim is to be global in the use of sources.

Neither crops nor historical periodization structure the book. The first chapter, “Times,” opens with a riff on date palms that dismisses straightforward historical chronology in clear terms. The movements of date trees, in both ancient Arab and recent American settings, defy a progressive historical narrative. Other riffs, on tobacco, rice, and cocoa, illuminate the intricate connections between crops and surrounding social-material structures in terms of seasonality, growth duration, and maturation. A final riff on millets connects history to current and future projections.

In chapters 2 and 3, the playful yet profound comments on analytical categories target understandings of “Places” and “Sizes

评论者 弗朗西斯卡-布雷等著的《移动作物与历史的尺度》 Harro Maat (bio) 《移动作物与历史的尺度》,弗朗西斯卡-布雷、芭芭拉-哈恩、约翰-博斯科-卢杜萨米和蒂亚戈-萨拉瓦著。纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2023 年。页码352.四位知名的技术史学家为我们带来了一本精彩而又鼓舞人心的作物史作品集。本书的重要意义远不止于此。虽然《移动的农作物》的核心是历史性的,它将世界各地的大量案例串联在一起,但其核心目的是概念性和史学性的:证明现有的农作物、材料和技术的全球历史大多是扭曲的。事实上,农作物是本书的核心主题,它提出了一种研究物质人工制品和商品的新方法,正如作者所说,它们是根深蒂固的全球历史的素材。选择农作物是有目的的。受法国年鉴学派历史学家关注景观的启发,作者提出了作物景观这一主导概念。作者对农作物景观的方法论深度进行了令人信服的解释,但这并不意味着读者必须进行抽象的阐述。该书之所以如此精彩,一个重要原因是作者将批判、方法和原则嫁接到具体案例中,以 "膛线 "的形式呈现,突出了作物故事生动有趣的风格。导言一章只用了寥寥几页纸,就为第一个故事做好了铺垫,通过两位古巴作家的作品,描绘了作物在古巴景观和社会变革中的核心作用。在这一点上,作者提出了一个重要的批评。大多数涉及古巴和农作物的历史几乎都不可避免地突出了西德尼-明茨。而在开篇,他却没有被叫上台,而古巴作家们却以同样的激情在台上表演。这是本书的一个回归模式,为作物故事带来了人们不太熟悉的作家和意想不到的转折。该书融合了西方知名学者的研究成果--明茨也在其他多处进行了采样--目的是在资料来源的使用上具有全球性。农作物和历史时期的划分都不是本书的结构。第一章 "时代 "以关于枣树的论述开篇,明确否定了直截了当的历史年表。无论是在古代阿拉伯还是近代美国,椰枣树的移动都违背了渐进的历史叙事。其他关于烟草、水稻和可可的短篇小说则从季节性、生长期和成熟期等方面揭示了农作物与周围社会物质结构之间错综复杂的联系。最后一篇关于黍的文章将历史与当前和未来的预测联系在一起。在第 2 章和第 3 章中,针对 "地点 "和 "规模 "的理解,对分析类别进行了俏皮而深刻的评论。在第 2 章的开头,作者解释了郁金香是如何通过资本主义、殖民主义和狡猾的营销者成为荷兰的标志性花卉 [第 998 页结束]。历史学家用这些术语重申了郁金香的故事,却忽略了在郁金香的原产地土耳其,郁金香作物也有着类似的偶像化和资本化的历史。关于山药的故事是一个精彩的故事,它讲述了一种作物在社会中的地位如何强化了近处和远处的群体和家庭的文化符号。山药的故事与第 2 章中的其他故事一样,与第 3 章 "大小 "很好地结合在一起,后者剖析了农作物的种植规模。在这一章中,除了种植植物或人类之外,还有其他重要角色。猪完成了对山药的改写,而第 3 章则以对水的优美改写结束,展示了(泥泞的)田地如何像作物一样需要水的精心耕作。作物景观概念的可塑性在第 4 章 "行动者 "和第 5 章 "构成 "中得到了进一步阐述。这两章中的抒情诗由橡胶、金鸡纳树等热带作物以及大象和棉铃虫组成。作为一个集体,不同的作物成为一个协同的作物景观。这两章的核心观点是,农业是人类对自然的技术控制,这种观点具有欺骗性,也许技术史学家对此并不陌生。然而,《移动的农作物》将案例和论点交织在一起的方式令人耳目一新,具有敏锐的洞察力...
{"title":"Moving Crops and the Scales of History by Francesca Bray et al (review)","authors":"Harro Maat","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933105","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Moving Crops and the Scales of History</em> by Francesca Bray et al <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Harro Maat (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Moving Crops and the Scales of History</em><br/> By Francesca Bray, Barbara Hahn, John Bosco Lourdusamy, and Tiago Saraiva. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2023. Pp. 352. <p>Four renowned historians of technology have delivered a wonderful and inspiring collection of crop histories. The book is important for more than just that. While the heart of <em>Moving Crops</em> is historic, stringing together a wealth of cases from different parts of the world, its central purpose is conceptual and historiographic: to demonstrate that much of the existing global history of crops, materials, and technology more generally is distorted.</p> <p>Indeed, crops are the central topic to present a new approach to material artifacts and commodities that, as the authors put it, are the stuff of rooted global history. The choice for crops is for a purpose. Inspired by the French Annales school historians focusing on landscapes, the authors present the cropscape as the leading concept.</p> <p>The methodological depth of the cropscape is convincingly explained, which is not to suggest the reader has to plow through abstract elaborations. A major reason the book is such a great read is the way critique, method, and principles are grafted onto concrete cases, presented as “riffs,” underlining the lively and entertaining style by which the crop stories are told. The introduction chapter needs only a handful of pages to set the stage for the first of these stories, portraying the centrality of crops in the transformation of the Cuban landscape and society through the works of two Cuban writers.</p> <p>At this point the authors add an important critique. Most histories involving Cuba and crops almost inevitably give prominence to Sidney Mintz. He’s not called on stage for the opening riff, where Cuban writers perform with equal verve. This is a returning pattern in the book and brings less familiar authors and unexpected twists to the crop stories. Blended with renowned Western scholars—Mintz is sampled at various other points—the aim is to be global in the use of sources.</p> <p>Neither crops nor historical periodization structure the book. The first chapter, “Times,” opens with a riff on date palms that dismisses straightforward historical chronology in clear terms. The movements of date trees, in both ancient Arab and recent American settings, defy a progressive historical narrative. Other riffs, on tobacco, rice, and cocoa, illuminate the intricate connections between crops and surrounding social-material structures in terms of seasonality, growth duration, and maturation. A final riff on millets connects history to current and future projections.</p> <p>In chapters 2 and 3, the playful yet profound comments on analytical categories target understandings of “Places” and “Sizes","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945 by Camila Gatica Mizala (review) 电影中的现代性:1915-1945 年布宜诺斯艾利斯和圣地亚哥的电影之旅》,作者 Camila Gatica Mizala(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933112
Cecilia Maas

Reviewed by:

  • Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945 by Camila Gatica Mizala
  • Cecilia Maas (bio)
Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945
By Camila Gatica Mizala. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2023. Pp. 266.

Modernity at the Movies sheds light on a largely unexplored facet of film history: the intricacies of exhibition and audience reception. The book addresses key questions: How did early film audiences perceive the advent of this technology? How did they experience going to the cinema in the early days? How did companies build their businesses around the exhibition of movies? How did the government and civil society actors react to the content of the films? Camila Gatica Mizala skillfully reconstructs the social customs surrounding cinema-going and the interaction of early audiences with the burgeoning technology of cinema. She compellingly argues that for the inhabitants of Buenos Aires and Santiago, the act of going to the cinema was a tangible expression of modernity in their everyday lives.

The book commences with an intriguing paradox: in the early twentieth century, cinema represented both a symbol of modernity and an escape from it. Films were a beacon of the latest technical advancements and embodied modern values like universalism and cosmopolitanism. Yet, as the opening quotation poignantly observes, cinema also offered respite from the “material and moral agitation of this terrible epilepsy that is called modern life.” This dichotomy positions cinema as an ideal lens through which to explore the experience of modernity in Latin American urban settings.

Mizala engages with a wide range of scholarly literature to define modernity. She intersects perspectives that highlight the subjective and experiential dimensions of modernity, as seen in the works of Marshall Berman, Reinhardt Koselleck, and Juan Sebastián Ospina León, with those viewing it as an elusive aspiration, as articulated by Nicola Miller. The book insightfully employs the notion of “multiple modernities” (S. N. Eisenstadt) and probes the question of where Latin America experienced modernity (Sarah Radcliffe), thereby crafting a nuanced definition that encompasses both technological evolution and emerging lifestyles in the context of a peripheral metropolis.

Over the course of five meticulously researched chapters, Mizala reconstructs various facets of cinema-going in Buenos Aires and Santiago. She examines the architecture, design, and equipment of cinema theaters; the pricing strategies and commercial tactics that transformed film into a mass entertainment medium; the state’s efforts to regulate film through censorship and its impact on the moral compass of viewers; the social practices and the explicit and implicit behavioral norms wi

评论者 电影中的现代性:布宜诺斯艾利斯和圣地亚哥的电影放映,1915-1945 年 作者:Camila Gatica Mizala Cecilia Maas (bio) 电影中的现代性:布宜诺斯艾利斯和圣地亚哥的电影放映,1915-1945 年 作者:Camila Gatica Mizala。匹兹堡:匹兹堡大学出版社,2023 年。第 266 页。电影中的现代性》揭示了电影史中一个在很大程度上未被探索的方面:展览和观众接收的复杂性。本书探讨了一些关键问题:早期的电影观众如何看待这一技术的出现?他们在早期是如何体验电影院的?公司是如何围绕电影放映开展业务的?政府和民间社会对电影内容有何反应?卡米拉-加蒂卡-米扎拉(Camila Gatica Mizala)巧妙地重构了围绕电影观影的社会习俗,以及早期观众与新兴电影技术的互动。她令人信服地指出,对于布宜诺斯艾利斯和圣地亚哥的居民来说,看电影是他们日常生活中现代性的具体体现。该书以一个耐人寻味的悖论开篇:在二十世纪初,电影既是现代性的象征,也是对现代性的逃避。电影是最新技术进步的灯塔,体现了普世主义和世界主义等现代价值观。然而,正如开篇引文所尖锐指出的,电影也为 "被称为现代生活的可怕癫痫病的物质和道德焦虑 "提供了喘息的机会。这种二分法将电影定位为探索拉丁美洲城市环境中现代性体验的理想镜头。Mizala 参考了大量学术文献来定义现代性。她将马歇尔-伯尔曼(Marshall Berman)、莱因哈特-科塞勒克(Reinhardt Koselleck)和胡安-塞巴斯蒂安-奥斯皮纳-莱昂(Juan Sebastián Ospina León)作品中强调现代性的主观和体验层面的观点,与尼古拉-米勒(Nicola Miller)将现代性视为一种难以捉摸的愿望的观点交织在一起。该书精辟地运用了 "多重现代性"(S. N. Eisenstadt)的概念,并探讨了拉丁美洲在哪里经历现代性(Sarah Radcliffe)的问题,从而提出了一个细致入微的定义,既包括技术演变,也包括外围大都市背景下的新兴生活方式。在精心研究的五个章节中,米扎拉重构了布宜诺斯艾利斯和圣地亚哥的电影观赏的方方面面。她考察了电影院的建筑、设计和设备;将电影转变为大众娱乐媒介的定价策略和商业手段;国家通过审查来管理电影的努力及其对观众道德观的影响;电影院内的社会实践和显性与隐性的行为规范;以及书面语言和口头语言在塑造观影体验中的作用。这些要素共同构成了对电影在拉丁美洲城市生活中的作用的全面理解。[本书聚焦于社会对技术的看法。通过与探讨社会如何吸收技术创新的文学作品(如伯恩哈德-里格的作品)相结合,米扎拉展示了电影在整个 20 世纪上半叶从技术新秀到受人尊敬的艺术形式的演变过程。电影中的现代性》是对全球技术史的贡献,因为它将注意力从技术创新的背景转移到了挪用过程。该书以独特的视角讲述了电影的故事:主角不是卢米埃尔兄弟首次放映电影时的巴黎人,而是遥远但相互联系的拉丁美洲南部充满活力的首府城市的居民。塞西莉亚-马斯 塞西莉亚-马斯拥有柏林自由大学博士学位。她的论文发表于《现代家庭的乐趣:阿根廷、智利和乌拉圭的新媒体和娱乐市场(1890-1920 年代)》(WBG, 2022 年)。 版权 © 2024 技术史学会 ...
{"title":"Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945 by Camila Gatica Mizala (review)","authors":"Cecilia Maas","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933112","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945</em> by Camila Gatica Mizala <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Cecilia Maas (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Modernity at the Movies: Cinema-Going in Buenos Aires and Santiago, 1915–1945</em><br/> By Camila Gatica Mizala. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2023. Pp. 266. <p><em>Modernity at the Movies</em> sheds light on a largely unexplored facet of film history: the intricacies of exhibition and audience reception. The book addresses key questions: How did early film audiences perceive the advent of this technology? How did they experience going to the cinema in the early days? How did companies build their businesses around the exhibition of movies? How did the government and civil society actors react to the content of the films? Camila Gatica Mizala skillfully reconstructs the social customs surrounding cinema-going and the interaction of early audiences with the burgeoning technology of cinema. She compellingly argues that for the inhabitants of Buenos Aires and Santiago, the act of going to the cinema was a tangible expression of modernity in their everyday lives.</p> <p>The book commences with an intriguing paradox: in the early twentieth century, cinema represented both a symbol of modernity and an escape from it. Films were a beacon of the latest technical advancements and embodied modern values like universalism and cosmopolitanism. Yet, as the opening quotation poignantly observes, cinema also offered respite from the “material and moral agitation of this terrible epilepsy that is called modern life.” This dichotomy positions cinema as an ideal lens through which to explore the experience of modernity in Latin American urban settings.</p> <p>Mizala engages with a wide range of scholarly literature to define modernity. She intersects perspectives that highlight the subjective and experiential dimensions of modernity, as seen in the works of Marshall Berman, Reinhardt Koselleck, and Juan Sebastián Ospina León, with those viewing it as an elusive aspiration, as articulated by Nicola Miller. The book insightfully employs the notion of “multiple modernities” (S. N. Eisenstadt) and probes the question of <em>where</em> Latin America experienced modernity (Sarah Radcliffe), thereby crafting a nuanced definition that encompasses both technological evolution and emerging lifestyles in the context of a peripheral metropolis.</p> <p>Over the course of five meticulously researched chapters, Mizala reconstructs various facets of cinema-going in Buenos Aires and Santiago. She examines the architecture, design, and equipment of cinema theaters; the pricing strategies and commercial tactics that transformed film into a mass entertainment medium; the state’s efforts to regulate film through censorship and its impact on the moral compass of viewers; the social practices and the explicit and implicit behavioral norms wi","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Franklin Ford Collection ed. by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer (review) 由 Dominique Trudel 和 Juliette De Maeyer 编辑的《富兰克林-福特文集》(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933119
Will Mari

Reviewed by:

  • Franklin Ford Collection ed. by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer
  • Will Mari (bio)
Franklin Ford Collection
Edited by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer. Bethlehem: Mediastudies.press, 2023. Pp. 297.

In this unique assembly of the key writings of American poly-math and philosopher Franklin Ford (1849–1918), Dominique Trudel (Audencia Business School) and Juliette De Maeyer (University of Montreal) have provided scholars with an invaluable resource. Namely, they have curated and placed into critical context, via an open-access publisher, Ford’s most important, surviving work on communication technology, as expressed via journalism, markets, transportation, and government. Furthermore, this work is from a formative moment in the creation of the modern field of sociology—specifically, media sociology—and the broader study of technology itself.

Ford was a brilliant, if eccentric and mysterious, figure—with part of the mystery enhanced by the loss of many of his personal papers and [End Page 1024] correspondence in a fire at Columbia University in October 1914 (pp. viii, xxviii). Best known for his ill-fated Thought News project with John Dewey at the University of Michigan in the early 1890s, Ford’s contributions to the development of pragmatist philosophy and, perhaps more indirectly, the Chicago School tradition (associated with one of his friends, Robert Park) are less well known. Scholars as varied as Daniel J. Czitrom, James Carey, and Norman Sims, along with Andrej Pinter, John Durham Peters, Jeff Pooley, and Zena Beth McGlashan, have worked to reconnect Ford to his contemporaries.

While Ford had a falling out with Dewey, the former influenced the latter’s ideas, especially the central concept of scientific inquiry. Trudel and De Maeyer review the relevant historiography surrounding Ford, and introduce the primary texts themselves, in an introduction that builds on their previous research into this enigmatic figure. They then discuss the three main themes of Ford’s often intellectually itinerant life (ranging from Detroit to New York City and everywhere in between), including “the specific problems of the press and the many remedies he envisioned . . . the interconnected flows of money, transportation, and communication central to modern industrial societies . . . and the political and social theory that lay behind Ford’s projects” (p. ix). Ford was interested in ideas that still impact our information economy, including how to sustain journalism and how technology could help markets govern themselves.

Of interest to historians of technology is how Ford conceived of “electric communication” in the form of early telephone and telegraph networks, as well as transportation systems (pp. 195, 236). Ford was fascinated with such tools and how they promised to reinvigor

评论者 富兰克林-福特文集》由 Dominique Trudel 和 Juliette De Maeyer 编辑 Will Mari (bio) 《富兰克林-福特文集》由 Dominique Trudel 和 Juliette De Maeyer 编辑。伯利恒:媒体研究出版社,2023 年。第 297 页。多米尼克-特鲁德尔(Audencia 商学院)和朱丽叶-德-梅耶尔(蒙特利尔大学)在这本独特的美国多数学和哲学家富兰克林-福特(1849-1918 年)主要著作集中,为学者们提供了宝贵的资源。也就是说,他们通过一家开放式出版社,对福特现存的最重要的通信技术著作进行了整理,并将其置于批判性的语境中,这些著作通过新闻、市场、交通和政府等领域表现出来。此外,这部著作还是现代社会学领域(特别是媒体社会学)以及更广泛的技术研究本身的奠基之作。福特是一个才华横溢的人物,尽管他性格古怪、神秘莫测--1914 年 10 月哥伦比亚大学的一场大火烧毁了他的许多私人文件和 [尾页 1024] 通信(第 viii 页和 xxviii 页),这更增添了他的神秘色彩。福特因其 19 世纪 90 年代初在密歇根大学与约翰-杜威(John Dewey)合作的 "思想新闻"(Thought News)项目而闻名于世,但他对实用主义哲学发展的贡献,以及对芝加哥学派传统(与他的一位朋友罗伯特-帕克(Robert Park)有关)的间接贡献却鲜为人知。Daniel J. Czitrom、James Carey 和 Norman Sims 等学者,以及 Andrej Pinter、John Durham Peters、Jeff Pooley 和 Zena Beth McGlashan 等学者,都致力于将福特与他同时代的人重新联系起来。虽然福特与杜威不和,但前者影响了后者的思想,尤其是科学探究的核心理念。Trudel 和 De Maeyer 回顾了围绕福特的相关史学研究,并在他们之前对这位神秘人物的研究基础上,介绍了主要文本本身。然后,他们讨论了福特经常在智力上四处奔波的生活(从底特律到纽约,以及中间的任何地方)的三大主题,包括 "新闻界的具体问题和他设想的许多补救措施......现代工业社会的核心是资金、交通和通信的相互联系......以及福特项目背后的政治和社会理论"(第 ix 页)。福特感兴趣的思想至今仍影响着我们的信息经济,包括如何维持新闻业以及技术如何帮助市场自我管理。技术史学家感兴趣的是福特如何构想早期电话和电报网络形式的 "电力通信 "以及运输系统(第 195 页和第 236 页)。福特对这些工具非常着迷,并对它们如何通过鼓励双向数据流的方式重振政府、新闻界和工业界充满信心,这种方式让人联想到互联网本身,以及一种全面的、更加以信息为导向的方法来解决社会弊病。货币和邮件的实物交换,以及 "信息"(即数据)传递同样价值的方式--这些都是互联网的前车之鉴--也将引起科技研究(STS)学者的兴趣(第 151-53 页)。Trudel 和 De Maeyer 的选文(19 篇文章或小册子,从 "行动草案 "到 "更好的信用报告"--Ford 的新闻背景是财经新闻--再到 "新闻是社会控制的主要元素")在简洁精炼的导言之后,还附有解释性注释,帮助读者了解这本多样化文集的来龙去脉。本项目的一个特别之处在于,本书可在出版商的网站上免费在线阅读。该文集中的许多文本尚未被数字化或保存,在美国各地的档案馆中一直未被发现。编辑们将它们汇集在一起,使它们不再默默无闻。他们相信,这样做--以这种形式展示福特的作品,作为 "连贯的深度挖掘"(第 xlvii 页)的一部分--可以鼓励更多关于福特及其圈子的学术研究,以及他们对社会学和 [End Page 1025] STS 诞生的集体影响和贡献。这也是对福特坚信思想的相互关联性以及对数据基础架构的全方位兴趣的重要性的尊重,而这一概念早在福特出现之前就已流行。为此,Trudel 和 De Maeyer 精心编撰的福特思想文集将具有重要意义。
{"title":"Franklin Ford Collection ed. by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer (review)","authors":"Will Mari","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933119","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Franklin Ford Collection</em> ed. by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Will Mari (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Franklin Ford Collection</em><br/> Edited by Dominique Trudel and Juliette De Maeyer. Bethlehem: Mediastudies.press, 2023. Pp. 297. <p>In this unique assembly of the key writings of American poly-math and philosopher Franklin Ford (1849–1918), Dominique Trudel (Audencia Business School) and Juliette De Maeyer (University of Montreal) have provided scholars with an invaluable resource. Namely, they have curated and placed into critical context, via an open-access publisher, Ford’s most important, surviving work on communication technology, as expressed via journalism, markets, transportation, and government. Furthermore, this work is from a formative moment in the creation of the modern field of sociology—specifically, media sociology—and the broader study of technology itself.</p> <p>Ford was a brilliant, if eccentric and mysterious, figure—with part of the mystery enhanced by the loss of many of his personal papers and <strong>[End Page 1024]</strong> correspondence in a fire at Columbia University in October 1914 (pp. viii, xxviii). Best known for his ill-fated <em>Thought News</em> project with John Dewey at the University of Michigan in the early 1890s, Ford’s contributions to the development of pragmatist philosophy and, perhaps more indirectly, the Chicago School tradition (associated with one of his friends, Robert Park) are less well known. Scholars as varied as Daniel J. Czitrom, James Carey, and Norman Sims, along with Andrej Pinter, John Durham Peters, Jeff Pooley, and Zena Beth McGlashan, have worked to reconnect Ford to his contemporaries.</p> <p>While Ford had a falling out with Dewey, the former influenced the latter’s ideas, especially the central concept of scientific inquiry. Trudel and De Maeyer review the relevant historiography surrounding Ford, and introduce the primary texts themselves, in an introduction that builds on their previous research into this enigmatic figure. They then discuss the three main themes of Ford’s often intellectually itinerant life (ranging from Detroit to New York City and everywhere in between), including “the specific problems of the press and the many remedies he envisioned . . . the interconnected flows of money, transportation, and communication central to modern industrial societies . . . and the political and social theory that lay behind Ford’s projects” (p. ix). Ford was interested in ideas that still impact our information economy, including how to sustain journalism and how technology could help markets govern themselves.</p> <p>Of interest to historians of technology is how Ford conceived of “electric communication” in the form of early telephone and telegraph networks, as well as transportation systems (pp. 195, 236). Ford was fascinated with such tools and how they promised to reinvigor","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng (review) Kathryn Conrad、Cóilín Parsons 和 Julie McCormick Weng 编著的《科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933132
Hamid Farahmandian

Reviewed by:

  • Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng
  • Hamid Farahmandian (bio)
Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism
Edited by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2019. Pp. xxii + 406.

The common misunderstanding regarding the depth of interest that Irish writers had in science and technology has arisen due to the dominant influence of certain iconic figures, such as W. B. Yeats. Yeats’s powerful and evocative imagery depicting scenes of the “sally gardens” and old Irish heroes has overshadowed the broader and more nuanced engagement of Irish writers with scientific and technological themes during the Literary and Cultural Revivals. The focus on traditional and cultural elements in works like Yeats’s has led to an underestimation of the multifaceted exploration of science and technology within the broader landscape of Irish modernist literature. In Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism, editors Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng challenge this commonly held belief by exploring the relationship between Irish modernism and emerging sciences and technologies in the early twentieth century.

The first part of the book explores how Irish Revivalists like J. M. Synge, Seumas O’Sullivan, and Emily Lawless aimed to reconcile religious and scientific experiences, suggesting reenchantment through scientific observation. It also discusses John Eglinton’s role in advocating for cosmopolitanism and modernity during the Irish Literary Revival. Transitioning to the 1916 Easter Rising, this part examines the impact of everyday life, cinema, and media technologies, emphasizing tableau vivant, montage, and film in shaping contemporary representations.

The second part examines Tom Greer’s technological concepts, like mechanical wings and print media, and their influence on James Joyce, with a particular focus on the protagonist of Ulysses, Stephen Dedalus, emphasizing their shared concern for the effects of scientific discourse on human interaction. It then shifts to Yeats, exploring his avant-garde use of theater technology, particularly scenography, as a deliberate break from conventional realism and English cultural materialism. A chapter on Elizabeth Bowen concludes this part by challenging the tech-tradition dichotomy, portraying gadget interactions and entrepreneurial pursuits in the travel industry as integral to her characters’ morality.

Part 3 investigates the impact of gramophones and radio on Lennox Robinson’s play Portrait (1925), serving as a metaphor for postindependence Ireland’s psychological strain. This part shifts to Joyce, exploring his adaptation to the evolving media landscape through gramophone recordings and the challenges faced during

评论者:Kathryn Conrad、Cóilín Parsons 和 Julie McCormick 科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》,凯瑟琳-康拉德、科林-帕森斯和朱莉-麦考密克-翁编著,哈米德-法拉曼迪安(简历),《科学、技术和爱尔兰现代主义》,凯瑟琳-康拉德、科林-帕森斯和朱莉-麦考密克-翁编著。锡拉丘兹:锡拉丘兹大学出版社,2019 年。第 xxii + 406 页。爱尔兰作家对科学和技术的兴趣之深,普遍存在误解,这是因为某些标志性人物(如 W. B. 叶芝)的主导影响。叶芝描绘的 "莎莉花园 "和爱尔兰老英雄的场景极具震撼力,令人回味无穷,这掩盖了爱尔兰作家在文学和文化复兴时期对科技主题更广泛、更细致入微的参与。对叶芝等作品中传统和文化元素的关注,导致人们低估了爱尔兰现代主义文学在更广阔的视野中对科学和技术的多方面探索。在《科学、技术与爱尔兰现代主义》一书中,编者凯瑟琳-康拉德(Kathryn Conrad)、科林-帕森斯(Cóilín Parsons)和朱莉-麦考密克-翁(Julie McCormick Weng)通过探讨爱尔兰现代主义与 20 世纪早期新兴科学和技术之间的关系,对这一普遍看法提出了挑战。本书的第一部分探讨了爱尔兰复兴主义者,如 J. M. Synge、Seumas O'Sullivan 和 Emily Lawless 是如何调和宗教与科学经验的,并建议通过科学观察来重新陶冶情操。报告还讨论了约翰-埃格林顿在爱尔兰文学复兴时期倡导世界主义和现代性的作用。这一部分过渡到 1916 年复活节起义,探讨了日常生活、电影和媒体技术的影响,强调了生动画面、蒙太奇和电影在塑造当代表象方面的作用。第二部分探讨了汤姆-格里尔的技术概念,如机械翅膀和印刷媒体,以及它们对詹姆斯-乔伊斯的影响,尤其关注《尤利西斯》的主人公斯蒂芬-德达鲁斯,强调他们共同关注科学话语对人类互动的影响。随后,本章转向叶芝,探讨了他对戏剧技术,尤其是场景设计的前卫运用,这是对传统现实主义和英国文化唯物主义的有意突破。伊丽莎白-鲍温(Elizabeth Bowen)一章对技术与传统的二分法提出了挑战,将旅游行业中的小工具互动和创业追求描绘成她笔下人物道德不可或缺的一部分,从而结束了这一部分。第 3 部分探讨了留声机和收音机对伦诺克斯-罗宾逊(Lennox Robinson)的戏剧《肖像》(1925 年)的影响,隐喻了独立后爱尔兰的心理压力。这一部分转向乔伊斯,探讨他通过留声机录音适应不断变化的媒体环境,以及在广播转型期所面临的挑战。本部分以丹尼斯-约翰斯顿(Denis Johnston)与广播及其独特戏剧的接触为结尾,强调了广播中的技术挑战和合作动力。[第四部分探讨了乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》中医学与文学的交集,重点关注心脏作为器官的意义;叶芝对优生学的迷恋存在问题,他提出对特定个人的教育进行限制,并对他认为爱尔兰社会中优等人的减少表示担忧;塞缪尔-贝克特对生物学的立场自相矛盾,特别是他对达尔文进化论的极少参与,反映了他超越传统科学话语的独特的存在主义探究。第五部分探讨了叶芝和贝克特对新物理学的吸收。叶芝将科学与神秘学相结合,以鬼魂为主题,而贝克特则利用极简的舞台元素探索光与时间。本章随后深入探讨了相对论和量子物理学的广泛影响,它们打破了传统科学的确定性,引入了不确定性。约翰-班维尔(John Banville)的科学四部曲进一步扩展了这一对话,在不断演变的科学景观中重塑了爱尔兰现代主义的叙事结构和文学-科学-时间关系。本书最重要的贡献之一是对爱尔兰现代主义本质上是反科学和卢德主义者这一普遍的刻板印象提出了挑战。该书强调了爱尔兰现代主义思想的丰富内涵,没有将科学技术视为对手,而是将其视为创造性景观中不可或缺的组成部分。该书鼓励读者接受跨学科的现代主义研究,重新评价了爱尔兰现代主义,揭示了以前未被充分探索的方面,并对传统与创新、本地与全球、诗意与科学之间的关系提供了细致入微的理解。这本爱尔兰现代主义的新书拓展了视野,邀请读者去了解爱尔兰的现代主义。
{"title":"Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng (review)","authors":"Hamid Farahmandian","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933132","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em> ed. by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons and Julie McCormick Weng <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Hamid Farahmandian (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em><br/> Edited by Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2019. Pp. xxii + 406. <p>The common misunderstanding regarding the depth of interest that Irish writers had in science and technology has arisen due to the dominant influence of certain iconic figures, such as W. B. Yeats. Yeats’s powerful and evocative imagery depicting scenes of the “sally gardens” and old Irish heroes has overshadowed the broader and more nuanced engagement of Irish writers with scientific and technological themes during the Literary and Cultural Revivals. The focus on traditional and cultural elements in works like Yeats’s has led to an underestimation of the multifaceted exploration of science and technology within the broader landscape of Irish modernist literature. In <em>Science, Technology, and Irish Modernism</em>, editors Kathryn Conrad, Cóilín Parsons, and Julie McCormick Weng challenge this commonly held belief by exploring the relationship between Irish modernism and emerging sciences and technologies in the early twentieth century.</p> <p>The first part of the book explores how Irish Revivalists like J. M. Synge, Seumas O’Sullivan, and Emily Lawless aimed to reconcile religious and scientific experiences, suggesting reenchantment through scientific observation. It also discusses John Eglinton’s role in advocating for cosmopolitanism and modernity during the Irish Literary Revival. Transitioning to the 1916 Easter Rising, this part examines the impact of everyday life, cinema, and media technologies, emphasizing tableau vivant, montage, and film in shaping contemporary representations.</p> <p>The second part examines Tom Greer’s technological concepts, like mechanical wings and print media, and their influence on James Joyce, with a particular focus on the protagonist of <em>Ulysses</em>, Stephen Dedalus, emphasizing their shared concern for the effects of scientific discourse on human interaction. It then shifts to Yeats, exploring his avant-garde use of theater technology, particularly scenography, as a deliberate break from conventional realism and English cultural materialism. A chapter on Elizabeth Bowen concludes this part by challenging the tech-tradition dichotomy, portraying gadget interactions and entrepreneurial pursuits in the travel industry as integral to her characters’ morality.</p> <p>Part 3 investigates the impact of gramophones and radio on Lennox Robinson’s play <em>Portrait</em> (1925), serving as a metaphor for postindependence Ireland’s psychological strain. This part shifts to Joyce, exploring his adaptation to the evolving media landscape through gramophone recordings and the challenges faced during","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141746262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things by John Tinnell (review) 帕洛阿尔托的哲学家:马克-韦泽、施乐 PARC 和最初的物联网》,约翰-廷内尔著(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933130
Andreas Hepp

Reviewed by:

  • The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things by John Tinnell
  • Andreas Hepp (bio)
The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things
By John Tinnell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. Pp. 368.

Historical research has provided an important understanding of how and in which social and cultural contexts today’s digital media and their infrastructures have emerged. Two definitive contributions are Fred Turner’s From Counterculture to Cyber-culture (2006), which centers on the Whole Earth Network, and Patrick McCray’s The Visioneers (2013), which explores space colonies and nanotechnologies in close relation to the developmental contexts of the digital era. Both studies incorporate personal approaches along with a broader social and cultural contextualization. The Philosopher of Palo Alto by John Tinnell follows a similar approach, concentrating on Mark Weiser (1952–99), a computer scientist and chief technology officer at Xerox PARC. However, the publication is not merely a biography; as the subtitle suggests, it aims to capture the emergence of what we now refer to as the “internet of things,” with reference to Weiser. The investigation is based on Weiser’s files in the Silicon Valley Archives at Stanford University, his publications, his interviews with former colleagues, and their publications.

The structure of The Philosopher of Palo Alto travels along ten chapters in chronological order. Following an introduction, the book begins with a contextualizing chapter on Xerox PARC. This section includes more biographical details, describing Weiser and his arrival in Palo Alto. The narrative then shifts to a more contemplative perspective, delving into Weiser’s interest in a philosophical approach to “things,” specifically through the influence of Michael Polanyi and Martin Heidegger. The extent to which Weiser’s technological thinking is influenced by phenomenology and the philosophy of life is a recurring theme throughout the book. It becomes clear that Weiser had significantly different ideas about the internet of things than the MIT [End Page 1046] Media Lab headed by Nicholas Negroponte, to which he positioned himself in opposition. However, it also becomes apparent to what extent Weiser’s approach to ubiquitous computing (“ubicomp”) was shaped through his debates and confrontations with colleagues, particularly with Lucy Such-man, who also worked at Xerox PARC. For Weiser, ubicomp did not mean transforming the human environment into a smart assistant—Negroponte’s “talking butler”—but rather, an “entanglement” of computer technology with the “natural” tangible environment of humans in which computer technology fades into the background. Tinnell’s study illustrates the hor

评论者: 帕洛阿尔托的哲学家:马克-韦泽、施乐 PARC 和最初的物联网 作者:约翰-廷内尔 Andreas Hepp(简历) 帕洛阿尔托的哲学家:马克-韦泽、施乐 PARC 和最初的物联网 作者:约翰-廷内尔:马克-韦泽、施乐 PARC 和最初的物联网 作者:约翰-廷内尔。芝加哥:芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.368.历史研究为我们了解当今数字媒体及其基础设施是如何以及在何种社会和文化背景下出现的提供了重要依据。弗雷德-特纳(Fred Turner)的《从反主流文化到网络文化》(2006 年)和帕特里克-麦克雷(Patrick McCray)的《远见者》(2013 年)是两部权威著作,前者以 "整个地球网络"(Whole Earth Network)为中心,探讨了与数字时代发展背景密切相关的太空殖民地和纳米技术。这两项研究都将个人方法与更广泛的社会和文化背景相结合。约翰-廷内尔(John Tinnell)所著的《帕洛阿尔托的哲学家》(The Philosopher of Palo Alto)也采用了类似的方法,集中介绍了施乐 PARC 的计算机科学家和首席技术官马克-韦泽(Mark Weiser,1952-99 年)。然而,这本出版物并不仅仅是一本传记;正如其副标题所示,它旨在通过韦泽来捕捉我们现在所说的 "物联网 "的出现。调查基于韦泽在斯坦福大学硅谷档案馆的档案、他的出版物、他与前同事的访谈以及他们的出版物。帕洛阿尔托的哲学家》的结构以时间为序,共十章。在导言之后,本书以有关施乐 PARC 的背景章节开始。这一部分包括更多的传记细节,描述了韦泽和他来到帕洛阿尔托的经历。然后,叙述转向了一个更具沉思性的视角,深入探讨了韦泽对 "事物 "哲学方法的兴趣,特别是受迈克尔-波兰尼和马丁-海德格尔的影响。韦泽的技术思想在多大程度上受到现象学和生命哲学的影响,是全书反复出现的主题。很明显,韦泽对物联网的想法与尼古拉斯-尼葛洛庞帝领导的麻省理工学院 [尾页 1046]媒体实验室大相径庭,他将自己定位在与之对立的位置上。不过,韦泽对泛在计算("ubicomp")的态度在多大程度上是通过与同事,尤其是与同在施乐 PARC 工作的露西-苏奇曼(Lucy Such-man)的辩论和对抗形成的,这一点也很明显。在韦泽看来,泛在计算并不意味着将人类环境转变为智能助手--即尼葛洛庞帝的 "会说话的管家"--而是计算机技术与人类 "自然 "有形环境的 "纠缠",在这种环境中,计算机技术逐渐淡出。廷内尔的研究说明了这种思维模式的前景,也说明了在知名媒体公司的支持下,尼葛洛庞帝的概念战胜韦泽概念的失败过程。韦泽的方法之所以没有获得麻省理工学院媒体实验室所获得的知名度,或许也是因为他过早地去世,导致他无法将自己的想法整理成书。约翰-廷内尔的这本书是一项出色的研究,材料丰富,叙述得当。这本书当然可以作为韦泽的实质性著作来读,出版商的营销策略大概也是这样暗示的。不过,在我看来,廷内尔的研究在另一个层面上更有意义,那就是更具分析性的思维浮出水面的时刻。在这些章节中,书中分析了韦泽如何通过与他人的密切互动来形成ubicomp 的思想。例如,我们了解到露西-苏奇曼(Lucy Suchman)所体现的人种学方法在施乐 PARC 中发挥的作用。这突出表明,当今的科技研究不仅以人与机器之间的独特 "纠缠 "为前提,而且还涉及技术发展与对人类实践的知情分析方法之间的相互交织。在所有这些方面,该书重申了对可能未来的想象以及精神思考在整个过程中所发挥的作用。因此,约翰-廷内尔在书中最有意义的见解并不是那些涉及韦泽传记的内容,而是那些解释人类环境计算机化的萌芽概念如何在多层次的具象化中出现的内容......
{"title":"The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things by John Tinnell (review)","authors":"Andreas Hepp","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933130","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things</em> by John Tinnell <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Andreas Hepp (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Philosopher of Palo Alto: Mark Weiser, Xerox PARC, and the Original Internet of Things</em><br/> By John Tinnell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. Pp. 368. <p>Historical research has provided an important understanding of how and in which social and cultural contexts today’s digital media and their infrastructures have emerged. Two definitive contributions are Fred Turner’s <em>From Counterculture to Cyber-culture</em> (2006), which centers on the Whole Earth Network, and Patrick McCray’s <em>The Visioneers</em> (2013), which explores space colonies and nanotechnologies in close relation to the developmental contexts of the digital era. Both studies incorporate personal approaches along with a broader social and cultural contextualization. <em>The Philosopher of Palo Alto</em> by John Tinnell follows a similar approach, concentrating on Mark Weiser (1952–99), a computer scientist and chief technology officer at Xerox PARC. However, the publication is not merely a biography; as the subtitle suggests, it aims to capture the emergence of what we now refer to as the “internet of things,” with reference to Weiser. The investigation is based on Weiser’s files in the Silicon Valley Archives at Stanford University, his publications, his interviews with former colleagues, and their publications.</p> <p>The structure of <em>The Philosopher of Palo Alto</em> travels along ten chapters in chronological order. Following an introduction, the book begins with a contextualizing chapter on Xerox PARC. This section includes more biographical details, describing Weiser and his arrival in Palo Alto. The narrative then shifts to a more contemplative perspective, delving into Weiser’s interest in a philosophical approach to “things,” specifically through the influence of Michael Polanyi and Martin Heidegger. The extent to which Weiser’s technological thinking is influenced by phenomenology and the philosophy of life is a recurring theme throughout the book. It becomes clear that Weiser had significantly different ideas about the internet of things than the MIT <strong>[End Page 1046]</strong> Media Lab headed by Nicholas Negroponte, to which he positioned himself in opposition. However, it also becomes apparent to what extent Weiser’s approach to ubiquitous computing (“ubicomp”) was shaped through his debates and confrontations with colleagues, particularly with Lucy Such-man, who also worked at Xerox PARC. For Weiser, ubicomp did not mean transforming the human environment into a smart assistant—Negroponte’s “talking butler”—but rather, an “entanglement” of computer technology with the “natural” tangible environment of humans in which computer technology fades into the background. Tinnell’s study illustrates the hor","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830 by Matthew Daniel Eddy (review) 媒体与心灵:艺术、科学和作为造纸机的笔记本,1700-1830 年》,马修-丹尼尔-埃迪著(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933134
Manon C. Williams

Reviewed by:

  • Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830 by Matthew Daniel Eddy
  • Manon C. Williams (bio)
Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830
By Matthew Daniel Eddy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. Pp. 423.

In Media and the Mind, Matthew Daniel Eddy provides an insightful and thorough exploration of student notebooks from Enlightenment Scotland, arguing that these notebooks operated as “paper machines” that facilitated cognitive processing and knowledge management. The study is based on extensive archival material collected from university, school, library, and family archives across Scotland. Eddy structures his argument around John Locke’s metaphor of the tabula rasa, the mind as a blank page, through which Eddy expands on this misinterpreted conceptualization of Enlightenment learning. Drawing on theories from disciplines as varied as anthropology, material culture, and cognitive science, he convincingly demonstrates that the notekeepers and their notekeeping practices are just as important to investigate as the contents on the page.

This study is extremely detailed and quite lengthy, containing interwoven arguments too numerous to expand upon here. It would appeal to historians of science and the Enlightenment, historians of education and childhood, and scholars of material culture and media. The book is divided into three parts, each encompassing a different educational phase: primary schools, academies, and universities. Within each part, the chapters cover a different skill that students learned and engaged with to illustrate a dynamic learning process. A particular strength of the book is how Eddy situates these students within the broader social, intellectual, and cultural processes of the eighteenth century, contributing to our understanding of the popular Enlightenment. His exploration of the often-neglected topic of childhood education and literacy is especially interesting (ch. 2), as is his analysis of the commodification of intellectual rights with regards to the circulation of university lectures in student notebooks (ch. 10).

Historians of technology will be especially interested in Eddy’s discussion of these notebooks as “paper machines,” a term drawn from media historian Markus Krajewski’s study of library index cards (Paper Machines, 2011). Eddy distinguishes student notebooks from a robust scholarship of “paper technologies,” employed by early modern cultural historians to describe the epistemic functions of paper records as material objects to organize and manage information. Summarizing Krajewski, Eddy writes: “As a material artifact, a ‘paper machine’ is a technology that consists of different paper components—slips, sheets, scraps—that are both crafted and set in motion by the human hand” (p. 6)

评论者: 媒体与思想:媒体与心灵:作为造纸机的艺术、科学和笔记本,1700-1830 年 作者:Matthew Daniel Eddy Manon C. Williams (bio) 媒体与心灵:作为造纸机的艺术、科学和笔记本,1700-1830 年 作者:Matthew Daniel Eddy:艺术、科学和作为造纸机的笔记本,1700-1830 年 作者:Matthew Daniel Eddy。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.423.在《媒体与心灵》一书中,马修-丹尼尔-埃迪对启蒙运动时期苏格兰的学生笔记本进行了深入透彻的探讨,认为这些笔记本作为 "造纸机",促进了认知处理和知识管理。这项研究基于从苏格兰各地的大学、学校、图书馆和家庭档案中收集到的大量档案资料。埃迪围绕约翰-洛克(John Locke)的 "白纸"(tabula rasa)隐喻展开论述,通过这一隐喻,埃迪对启蒙学习的这一被误读的概念进行了阐释。他借鉴了人类学、物质文化和认知科学等不同学科的理论,令人信服地证明了记笔记者及其记笔记的方法与书页上的内容同样重要。这项研究极为详尽,篇幅也相当长,其中包含的论点相互交织,不胜枚举,在此不一一赘述。它将吸引科学和启蒙运动史学家、教育和童年史学家以及物质文化和媒体学者。本书分为三个部分,每个部分涵盖不同的教育阶段:小学、学院和大学。在每一部分中,各章都涉及学生学习和参与的不同技能,以说明一个动态的学习过程。本书的一个特别之处在于,艾迪将这些学生置于十八世纪更广泛的社会、知识和文化进程中,有助于我们理解大众启蒙运动。他对经常被忽视的儿童教育和扫盲问题的探讨尤其有趣(第2章),他对学生笔记本中大学讲义的流通所涉及的知识产权商品化问题的分析也很有趣(第10章)。技术史学家会对艾迪将这些笔记本视为 "造纸机 "的论述特别感兴趣,这个术语来自媒体史学家马库斯-克拉耶夫斯基(Markus Krajewski)对图书馆索引卡的研究(Paper Machines, 2011)。Eddy 将学生笔记本与 "纸张技术 "这一有力的学术研究区分开来,"纸张技术 "被早期现代文化史学家用来描述纸张记录作为组织和管理信息的物质对象的认识功能。在总结 Krajewski 的观点时,Eddy 写道:"作为一种物质人工制品,'造纸机'是一种技术,它由不同的纸张组件--纸片、纸张、纸屑--组成,这些组件既是手工制作的,也是由人手移动的"(第 6 页)。运动和可操作性的重要性在第 3 章 "编纂"(将笔记本装订成单一信息媒介的做法)中才得以体现,Eddy 将其描述为 "当时学生可以学习创造的最重要的纸机之一"(第 85 页)。埃迪认为,编纂工具的可操作性以及其中蕴含的技能--从组装到作为信息处理和检索设备的使用--使其有别于其他纸质技术。当学生们进入大学时,他们已经学会了 "将庞大的知识系统压缩到纸张机器中",从而能够参与启蒙运动的 "知识经济"(第 267 页)。无论学者们是否相信将笔记本标注为机器而非技术的实用性,埃迪的分析都为我们提供了宝贵的见解,让我们了解学生笔记本是如何帮助学生、笔记本和笔记之间的动态学习过程的。在埃迪看来,笔记本不是被动的物品,不是积累知识的宝库,也不是信息管理的工具。作为个人的 "媒体技术",笔记本允许学生 "以一种有意义、有目的的方式与信息打交道"(第 4 页)。学生笔记本和笔记的动觉性和记忆性代表了 "知识的可塑性"(第86页),是理解洛克的 "白板 "隐喻的核心。埃迪提出了一个令人信服的论点,将学生笔记本重新定义为一种互动技术,它促进了学习、代理和推理发展的动态过程。学者们有可能将这些观点应用到其他形式的笔记和记录中。媒体与心智》为纸质技术和信息管理方面的学术研究提供了一个图文并茂的补充,尽管有时会显得错综复杂。作为一...
{"title":"Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830 by Matthew Daniel Eddy (review)","authors":"Manon C. Williams","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933134","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830</em> by Matthew Daniel Eddy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Manon C. Williams (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Media and the Mind: Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830</em><br/> By Matthew Daniel Eddy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. Pp. 423. <p>In <em>Media and the Mind</em>, Matthew Daniel Eddy provides an insightful and thorough exploration of student notebooks from Enlightenment Scotland, arguing that these notebooks operated as “paper machines” that facilitated cognitive processing and knowledge management. The study is based on extensive archival material collected from university, school, library, and family archives across Scotland. Eddy structures his argument around John Locke’s metaphor of the tabula rasa, the mind as a blank page, through which Eddy expands on this misinterpreted conceptualization of Enlightenment learning. Drawing on theories from disciplines as varied as anthropology, material culture, and cognitive science, he convincingly demonstrates that the notekeepers and their notekeeping practices are just as important to investigate as the contents on the page.</p> <p>This study is extremely detailed and quite lengthy, containing interwoven arguments too numerous to expand upon here. It would appeal to historians of science and the Enlightenment, historians of education and childhood, and scholars of material culture and media. The book is divided into three parts, each encompassing a different educational phase: primary schools, academies, and universities. Within each part, the chapters cover a different skill that students learned and engaged with to illustrate a dynamic learning process. A particular strength of the book is how Eddy situates these students within the broader social, intellectual, and cultural processes of the eighteenth century, contributing to our understanding of the popular Enlightenment. His exploration of the often-neglected topic of childhood education and literacy is especially interesting (ch. 2), as is his analysis of the commodification of intellectual rights with regards to the circulation of university lectures in student notebooks (ch. 10).</p> <p>Historians of technology will be especially interested in Eddy’s discussion of these notebooks as “paper machines,” a term drawn from media historian Markus Krajewski’s study of library index cards (<em>Paper Machines</em>, 2011). Eddy distinguishes student notebooks from a robust scholarship of “paper technologies,” employed by early modern cultural historians to describe the epistemic functions of paper records as material objects to organize and manage information. Summarizing Krajewski, Eddy writes: “As a material artifact, a ‘paper machine’ is a technology that consists of different paper components—slips, sheets, scraps—that are both crafted and set in motion by the human hand” (p. 6)","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson (review) 罗兰-杰克逊撰写的《十九世纪英国国家的科学建议》(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933118
Edward J. Gillin

Reviewed by:

  • Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson
  • Edward J. Gillin (bio)
Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State
By Roland Jackson. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2023. Pp. 464.

For anyone interested in the history of scientific advice and government, the past three or four years have delivered an endless stream of gobbets, thanks in large part to the eloquence of the United Kingdom’s political elites. In July 2020, while planning the reopening of the British economy following its first COVID-19 lockdown, the then chancellor of the exchequer, Rishi Sunak, was reported to have identified the real challenge to be “about handling the scientists, not handling the virus.” [End Page 1022] It later came out that the government’s chief scientific adviser referred to Sunak as “Dr Death, the chancellor.” The recent public inquiry into the U.K. government’s handling of the COVID crisis has revealed a huge lack of cohesion between policymakers and scientific advisers, characterized by mistrust, lack of understanding, and a culture of blame. With this in mind, Roland Jackson’s Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State is timely.

As Jackson observes, nineteenth-century Britain represented a significant time and place for the formation of state-science relations, both in terms of the legislative and the executive. What follows is a broad overview of the various subjects and challenges on which nineteenth-century scientific specialists sought to influence public policy. Such a wide-ranging overview is long overdue: as the earliest nation to industrialize and mobilize fossil fuels toward economic expansion, the role of technical knowledge in the nineteenth-century British state resonates with many of the challenges facing twenty-first-century societies around the world. This is made particularly apparent by Jackson’s canny division of the areas in which the British state was most concerned between 1815 and 1900, namely the armed forces (pt. 2), the management of food resources (pt. 3), the regulation of transport and infrastructure (pt. 4), industry (pt. 5), public health and social policy (pt. 6), and revenue and standards (pt. 7). Chapter 12, “Infection and Disease,” will be especially relevant to readers, given its focus on the management of cholera epidemics and the historic tensions between politicians and advisers over quarantine periods and economic recovery. Chapter 6, on fisheries, seems equally relevant if somewhat depressing in its familiarity to contemporary discussions over sustainability in this industry: it seems that the British state has never successfully organized its fishing sector.

The extensive nature of this study inevitably means that there are a few omissions, which, while not undermining the volume’s

评论者 罗兰-杰克逊给 19 世纪英国国家的科学建议 Edward J. Gillin (bio) 罗兰-杰克逊给 19 世纪英国国家的科学建议。匹兹堡:匹兹堡大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.464.对于任何对科学建议和政府历史感兴趣的人来说,过去的三四年里都有说不完的大道理,这在很大程度上要归功于英国政治精英们的口才。据报道,2020 年 7 月,时任财政大臣的里希-苏纳克在规划英国经济在第一次 COVID-19 封锁后的重新开放时,认为真正的挑战是 "如何处理科学家,而不是处理病毒"。[后来,政府的首席科学顾问称苏纳克为 "死亡博士,财政大臣"。最近对英国政府处理 COVID 危机的公开调查显示,决策者和科学顾问之间严重缺乏凝聚力,表现为不信任、不理解和指责文化。有鉴于此,罗兰-杰克逊(Roland Jackson)的《十九世纪英国国家的科学建议》(Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State)一书可谓恰逢其时。正如杰克逊所言,19 世纪的英国是国家与科学关系形成的重要时间和地点,无论是在立法方面还是在行政方面。接下来将对十九世纪科学专家试图影响公共政策的各种课题和挑战进行广泛概述。这种广泛的概述早该进行:作为最早实现工业化并利用化石燃料进行经济扩张的国家,技术知识在十九世纪英国国家中的作用与二十一世纪全球社会面临的许多挑战产生了共鸣。杰克逊巧妙地划分了 1815 至 1900 年间英国国家最关注的领域,即武装部队(第 2 章)、粮食资源管理(第 3 章)、运输和基础设施监管(第 4 章)、工业(第 5 章)、公共卫生和社会政策(第 6 章)以及税收和标准(第 7 章),这一点尤其明显。第 12 章 "感染与疾病 "与读者尤为相关,因为该章的重点是霍乱流行病的管理,以及政治家与顾问之间在检疫期和经济复苏方面的历史性紧张关系。第 6 章是关于渔业的,这一章似乎也与当代关于渔业可持续发展的讨论息息相关,虽然有些令人沮丧:英国国家似乎从未成功地组织过其渔业部门。本研究的广泛性不可避免地意味着有一些遗漏,虽然这并不影响本卷的价值,但却令人惊讶。在确立了科学从业者在英国政府中获得 "权威和影响力 "这一主题(第 3 页)之后,或许可以更多地论述 19 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代反对《传染病法》的运动对医学权威的威胁,尤其是考虑到这对后来组织妇女选举权运动的重要性(第 252-53 页)。同样,政府对铁引起的罗盘误差风险和可靠的远洋航行问题的干预也被遗漏,这让我感到惊讶。约翰-卡伍德(John Cawood)("The Magnetic Crusade",1979 年)和克里斯托弗-卡特(Christopher Carter)("Magnetic Fever",2009 年)已经做了很多工作来说明这在 19 世纪 30 年代和 40 年代科学与国家关系中的重要性,特别是考虑到英国政府对全球磁现象勘测的资助,这种勘测后来被称为 "磁学十字军东征",尽管这并不符合历史事实。值得称赞的是,杰克逊承认本书并非研究政府对科学研究的支持或对议会投资的游说(第 5 页)。不过,鉴于他对皇家海军和英国军事 [第 1023 页完] 承诺的重视,这一疏漏还是值得注意的,尤其是考虑到科学权威的问题:正如艾莉森-温特(Alison Winter,"'指南针都是错的'",1994 年)所指出的,指南针的误差问题对乔治-比德尔-艾里(George Biddell Airy)这样的精英科学专家的可信度提出了令人震惊的质疑。尽管如此,杰克逊的这本书成功地解读了 19 世纪英国政府与科学建议之间的关系所面临的限制......
{"title":"Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson (review)","authors":"Edward J. Gillin","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933118","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State</em> by Roland Jackson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Edward J. Gillin (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State</em><br/> By Roland Jackson. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2023. Pp. 464. <p>For anyone interested in the history of scientific advice and government, the past three or four years have delivered an endless stream of gobbets, thanks in large part to the eloquence of the United Kingdom’s political elites. In July 2020, while planning the reopening of the British economy following its first COVID-19 lockdown, the then chancellor of the exchequer, Rishi Sunak, was reported to have identified the real challenge to be “about handling the scientists, not handling the virus.” <strong>[End Page 1022]</strong> It later came out that the government’s chief scientific adviser referred to Sunak as “Dr Death, the chancellor.” The recent public inquiry into the U.K. government’s handling of the COVID crisis has revealed a huge lack of cohesion between policymakers and scientific advisers, characterized by mistrust, lack of understanding, and a culture of blame. With this in mind, Roland Jackson’s <em>Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State</em> is timely.</p> <p>As Jackson observes, nineteenth-century Britain represented a significant time and place for the formation of state-science relations, both in terms of the legislative and the executive. What follows is a broad overview of the various subjects and challenges on which nineteenth-century scientific specialists sought to influence public policy. Such a wide-ranging overview is long overdue: as the earliest nation to industrialize and mobilize fossil fuels toward economic expansion, the role of technical knowledge in the nineteenth-century British state resonates with many of the challenges facing twenty-first-century societies around the world. This is made particularly apparent by Jackson’s canny division of the areas in which the British state was most concerned between 1815 and 1900, namely the armed forces (pt. 2), the management of food resources (pt. 3), the regulation of transport and infrastructure (pt. 4), industry (pt. 5), public health and social policy (pt. 6), and revenue and standards (pt. 7). Chapter 12, “Infection and Disease,” will be especially relevant to readers, given its focus on the management of cholera epidemics and the historic tensions between politicians and advisers over quarantine periods and economic recovery. Chapter 6, on fisheries, seems equally relevant if somewhat depressing in its familiarity to contemporary discussions over sustainability in this industry: it seems that the British state has never successfully organized its fishing sector.</p> <p>The extensive nature of this study inevitably means that there are a few omissions, which, while not undermining the volume’s ","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives ed. by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss (review) 计算机如何进入课堂,1960-2000:历史视角》,卡门-弗鲁里和迈克尔-盖斯编(评论)
IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1353/tech.2024.a933129
Stephen Petrina

Reviewed by:

  • How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives ed. by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss
  • Stephen Petrina (bio)
How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives
Edited by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023. Pp. 240.

Exactly how did computers enter classrooms across the world in the 1960s through the 1990s? Were the practices and processes of this innovation similar from school to school or country to country? How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000 is a welcome addition to the historiography of educational media and technology. Across the introduction and nine cases/chapters is a consistent, focused engagement with the historical problem of computational innovation in schools and classrooms. Despite the cultural and linguistic differences from case to case—France, Hungary, Latvia, Sweden, West Germany, Switzerland, UNESCO, the European Community (EC), and the OECD—the book achieves a remarkable consistency.

In the introduction, Flury and Geiss provide a comprehensive historiography of computational innovation in the schools of eastern and western Europe. In the first case, Cardon-Quint documents France’s Le Plan [End Page 1044] Informatique pour tous, rolled out from 1984–88. Historians are hard-pressed to find another centralized case of this rapidity, scale, and scope in the early to mid-1980s. In the second case, Somogyvári, Szabó, and Képes document the decentralized, extracurricular, hands-on agency of students and teachers in Hungary, primarily through cybernetics clubs in Budapest during the 1960s and 1970s. Kestere and Purina-Bieza’s case of Latvia in the third chapter demonstrates parallels with Hungary with a focus on the 1980s and 1990s. Uniquely, the authors employ a nice integration of oral histories and primary records to explore efforts such as grassroots learning “on the basis of friendship.” In the fourth chapter, Cantarell explores how government officials in Sweden during the 1980s and 1990s relied on teachers to take the lead in computational innovation. Cantarell details the give-and-take of the Datorn i skolan and subsequent government-funded computers in schools initiatives from 1973 through the early 1980s. Similarly in the fifth case, Flury contextualizes the to-and-fro among the West German government, private sector vendors, and public school educators necessary to innovation in the 1980s. From March 1984 through 1988, the Computer + Bildung (Computers and Education) support association was an “intermediary actor” (p. 125). Geiss prefaces the sixth case with an observation that “due to the decentralized political structure of Switzerland, there are various historical pathways of computer education” (p. 148). Through a diverse range of actors and initiati

评论者 计算机如何进入课堂,1960-2000:历史视角》,卡门-弗鲁里和迈克尔-盖斯编 斯蒂芬-佩特里纳(简历):《计算机如何进入课堂,1960-2000:历史视角》,卡门-弗鲁里和迈克尔-盖斯编。柏林:De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023。第 240 页。20 世纪 60 年代到 90 年代,计算机究竟是如何进入世界各地的课堂的?不同学校或不同国家的创新实践和过程是否相似?计算机是如何进入课堂的,1960-2000》是教育媒体和技术史学的又一力作。在导言和九个案例/章节中,作者始终如一、重点突出地探讨了学校和课堂中计算机创新的历史问题。尽管各个案例--法国、匈牙利、拉脱维亚、瑞典、西德、瑞士、联合国教科文组织、欧洲共同体(EC)和经合组织--在文化和语言上存在差异,但该书实现了显著的一致性。在引言中,弗鲁里和盖斯对东西欧学校的计算创新进行了全面的历史研究。在第一个案例中,卡东-昆特(Cardon-Quint)记录了法国在1984-88年间推出的 "全民信息计划"(Le Plan [End Page 1044] Informatique pour tous)。在 20 世纪 80 年代早期到中期,历史学家很难找到另一个如此迅速、规模如此之大、范围如此之广的集中式案例。在第二个案例中,Somogyvári、Szabó 和 Képes 主要通过 20 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代布达佩斯的控制论俱乐部,记录了匈牙利学生和教师的分散、课外、实践活动。Kestere 和 Purina-Bieza 在第三章中介绍了拉脱维亚的情况,以 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代为重点,展示了与匈牙利的相似之处。与众不同的是,作者将口述历史和原始记录很好地结合在一起,探讨了 "基于友谊 "的基层学习等工作。在第四章中,Cantarell 探讨了 20 世纪 80 年代和 90 年代瑞典政府官员如何依靠教师在计算创新方面发挥带头作用。坎塔雷尔详细介绍了从 1973 年到 20 世纪 80 年代初,Datorn i skolan 和随后由政府资助的计算机进校园计划的付出与回报。同样,在第五个案例中,弗鲁里介绍了 20 世纪 80 年代西德政府、私营部门供应商和公立学校教育工作者之间为创新所必需的来来往往。从 1984 年 3 月到 1988 年,Computer + Bildung(计算机与教育)支持协会是一个 "中介角色"(第 125 页)。盖斯在介绍第六个案例时指出,"由于瑞士的政治结构分散,计算机教育的历史路径多种多样"(第 148 页)。例如,通过各种参与者和倡议,到 1980 年,瑞士几乎所有高中都开设了某种形式的计算机科学课程(第 153 页)。最后三章以联合国教科文组织、欧共体和经合组织为重点,阐述了政策案例。在第一章中,Priem 记载了世界信息与传播新秩序的背景,从 1945 年 11 月联合国教科文组织的成立到 20 世纪 70 年代初人们的深切关注。在第 8 章中,盖斯、弗鲁里和格雷罗从 1973 年全球石油危机开始,追溯了欧共体 "对初始和继续职业教育与培训的预期作用 "与计算创新的相互依存关系。在最后一章,霍夫对经合组织的档案进行了生动的解读,这些档案 "记录了从 1968 年到 1973 年的无数次会议,这些会议证明了对新兴技术的夸大其词以及对计算机将深刻改变教育的乐观态度"(第 218 页)。本章的其余部分重点介绍了经合组织的教育研究与创新中心,该中心成立于 1968 年,目的是 "消除眩晕",并以实用性和感性来缓和夸夸其谈。该书是了解欧洲学校计算创新的重要原创史料。当然,仍然存在一些问题。首先,令人惊讶的是,在学校计算创新的历史中,图书馆员和图书馆作为常见的重要参与者或机构却未被提及。书中没有提到图书管理员,唯一提到图书馆的地方只是简短地提到联合国教科文组织 "促进了学校图书馆的建立"(第 179 页)。即使对 "课堂 "进行了狭义的定义,历史学家也不能忽视图书馆作为学习、研究、使用或通过......学习的空间。
{"title":"How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives ed. by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss (review)","authors":"Stephen Petrina","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933129","url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives</em> ed. by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Stephen Petrina (bio) </li> </ul> <em>How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000: Historical Perspectives</em><br/> Edited by Carmen Flury and Michael Geiss. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023. Pp. 240. <p>Exactly how did computers enter classrooms across the world in the 1960s through the 1990s? Were the practices and processes of this innovation similar from school to school or country to country? <em>How Computers Entered the Classroom, 1960–2000</em> is a welcome addition to the historiography of educational media and technology. Across the introduction and nine cases/chapters is a consistent, focused engagement with the historical problem of computational innovation in schools and classrooms. Despite the cultural and linguistic differences from case to case—France, Hungary, Latvia, Sweden, West Germany, Switzerland, UNESCO, the European Community (EC), and the OECD—the book achieves a remarkable consistency.</p> <p>In the introduction, Flury and Geiss provide a comprehensive historiography of computational innovation in the schools of eastern and western Europe. In the first case, Cardon-Quint documents France’s <em>Le Plan</em> <strong>[End Page 1044]</strong> <em>Informatique pour tous</em>, rolled out from 1984–88. Historians are hard-pressed to find another centralized case of this rapidity, scale, and scope in the early to mid-1980s. In the second case, Somogyvári, Szabó, and Képes document the decentralized, extracurricular, hands-on agency of students and teachers in Hungary, primarily through cybernetics clubs in Budapest during the 1960s and 1970s. Kestere and Purina-Bieza’s case of Latvia in the third chapter demonstrates parallels with Hungary with a focus on the 1980s and 1990s. Uniquely, the authors employ a nice integration of oral histories and primary records to explore efforts such as grassroots learning “on the basis of friendship.” In the fourth chapter, Cantarell explores how government officials in Sweden during the 1980s and 1990s relied on teachers to take the lead in computational innovation. Cantarell details the give-and-take of the <em>Datorn i skolan</em> and subsequent government-funded computers in schools initiatives from 1973 through the early 1980s. Similarly in the fifth case, Flury contextualizes the to-and-fro among the West German government, private sector vendors, and public school educators necessary to innovation in the 1980s. From March 1984 through 1988, the Computer + Bildung (Computers and Education) support association was an “intermediary actor” (p. 125). Geiss prefaces the sixth case with an observation that “due to the decentralized political structure of Switzerland, there are various historical pathways of computer education” (p. 148). Through a diverse range of actors and initiati","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141743496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Technology and Culture
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1