Teaching Family? Care/Work Policy in Selected Family Courses in Canada’s Research-Intensive Universities

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Sociology Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1177/0092055x241248183
Susan Prentice, Lindsey McKay, Trina McKellep
{"title":"Teaching Family? Care/Work Policy in Selected Family Courses in Canada’s Research-Intensive Universities","authors":"Susan Prentice, Lindsey McKay, Trina McKellep","doi":"10.1177/0092055x241248183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To what degree is explicit care/work policy taught in family courses in Canada’s leading research-intensive universities? We analyze family courses in sociology departments and in political studies and women’s/gender studies programs in Canada’s 15 R1 universities to make a contribution to the scholarship of teaching and learning. This national scan marks a methodological innovation from curriculum studies that generally adopt a single-program or single-site focus. From a Canadian universe of 74 family courses, we identify 15 whose formal course calendar description explicitly addresses care/work family policy (measures to reconcile caring for young children with employment, through early learning and childcare, parental leaves, and child benefits). Sociology predominates among courses where family policy is taught, yet care/work policy content is not common. Given growing concerns about the care crisis and the care deficit in Canada, the low profile of care/work family policy content in family courses is significant. This study sheds light on the value of national postsecondary education curricular reviews and suggests that family curriculum renewal is warranted.","PeriodicalId":46942,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x241248183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To what degree is explicit care/work policy taught in family courses in Canada’s leading research-intensive universities? We analyze family courses in sociology departments and in political studies and women’s/gender studies programs in Canada’s 15 R1 universities to make a contribution to the scholarship of teaching and learning. This national scan marks a methodological innovation from curriculum studies that generally adopt a single-program or single-site focus. From a Canadian universe of 74 family courses, we identify 15 whose formal course calendar description explicitly addresses care/work family policy (measures to reconcile caring for young children with employment, through early learning and childcare, parental leaves, and child benefits). Sociology predominates among courses where family policy is taught, yet care/work policy content is not common. Given growing concerns about the care crisis and the care deficit in Canada, the low profile of care/work family policy content in family courses is significant. This study sheds light on the value of national postsecondary education curricular reviews and suggests that family curriculum renewal is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭教学?加拿大研究密集型大学部分家庭课程中的护理/工作政策
加拿大主要研究密集型大学的家庭课程在多大程度上教授了明确的护理/工作政策?我们对加拿大 15 所 R1 大学的社会学系、政治研究和妇女/性别研究专业的家庭课程进行了分析,以期为教学研究做出贡献。与一般采用单一课程或单一地点为重点的课程研究相比,这次全国性扫描标志着一种方法上的创新。在加拿大的 74 门家庭课程中,我们发现有 15 门课程的正式课程日历说明明确涉及照顾/工作家庭政策(通过早期学习和儿童保育、育儿假和儿童福利来协调照顾幼儿和就业的措施)。在讲授家庭政策的课程中,社会学占主导地位,但护理/工作政策内容并不常见。鉴于人们日益关注加拿大的护理危机和护理赤字问题,护理/工作家庭政策内容在家庭课程中的低调显得尤为重要。本研究揭示了国家中学后教育课程审查的价值,并建议对家庭课程进行更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Sociology
Teaching Sociology Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
31.80%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Teaching Sociology (TS) publishes articles, notes, and reviews intended to be helpful to the discipline"s teachers. Articles range from experimental studies of teaching and learning to broad, synthetic essays on pedagogically important issues. Notes focus on specific teaching issues or techniques. The general intent is to share theoretically stimulating and practically useful information and advice with teachers. Formats include full-length articles; notes of 10 pages or less; interviews, review essays; reviews of books, films, videos, and software; and conversations.
期刊最新文献
New Resources in TRAILS: The Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology Black Lives Matter and the Changing Sociological Canon: An Analysis of Syllabi from 2012 to 2023 The Pandemic Classroom and Supportive Relationships: Antidote to Neoliberalism in Higher Education? 2023 Hans O. Mauksch Address for Distinguished Contributions to Undergraduate Teaching Unsettling Sociology Curriculum: Indigenous Content in Introductory Sociology Textbooks Podcast Review: The End of Sport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1