{"title":"Ambitious ideals, realistic expectations: how prior experiences with structures moderate the goals of Section 8 voucher holders through frames","authors":"Zawadi Rucks-Ahidiana","doi":"10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A core component of sociological studies of behavior and decision-making is understanding how people navigate their cultural toolkits. In this article, I explain how cultural tools are translated into goals. I argue that structure not only informs the barriers and opportunities people face in pursuing goals, but informs how they evaluate their goals to determine which are worth pursuing through “experiential frames” produced by prior experiences. Using Young’s (The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) distinction between ideals (dreams), aspirations (goals with clear courses of action), and expectations (goals with clear courses of action viewed as achievable), I demonstrate this by analyzing the economic mobility goals of 34 Section 8 voucher holders living in New York City and the experiential frames that informed those goals. I find that while most respondents would like to achieve economic upward mobility, they evaluated goals that would reproduce their socio-economic position as aspirations or expectations through their experiential frames with housing, employment, education, and navigating the labor market. The findings contribute theoretically to the sociology of the future and the cultural sociology of goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":45140,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cultural Sociology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cultural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A core component of sociological studies of behavior and decision-making is understanding how people navigate their cultural toolkits. In this article, I explain how cultural tools are translated into goals. I argue that structure not only informs the barriers and opportunities people face in pursuing goals, but informs how they evaluate their goals to determine which are worth pursuing through “experiential frames” produced by prior experiences. Using Young’s (The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) distinction between ideals (dreams), aspirations (goals with clear courses of action), and expectations (goals with clear courses of action viewed as achievable), I demonstrate this by analyzing the economic mobility goals of 34 Section 8 voucher holders living in New York City and the experiential frames that informed those goals. I find that while most respondents would like to achieve economic upward mobility, they evaluated goals that would reproduce their socio-economic position as aspirations or expectations through their experiential frames with housing, employment, education, and navigating the labor market. The findings contribute theoretically to the sociology of the future and the cultural sociology of goals.
期刊介绍:
From modernity''s onset, social theorists have been announcing the death of meaning, at the hands of market forces, impersonal power, scientific expertise, and the pervasive forces of rationalization and industrialization. Yet, cultural structures and processes have proved surprisingly resilient. Relatively autonomous patterns of meaning - sweeping narratives and dividing codes, redolent if elusive symbols, fervent demands for purity and cringing fears of pollution - continue to exert extraordinary effects on action and institutions. They affect structures of inequality, racism and marginality, gender and sexuality, crime and punishment, social movements, market success and citizen incorporation. New and old new media project continuous symbolic reconstructions of private and public life. As contemporary sociology registered the continuing robustness of cultural power, the new discipline of cultural sociology was born. How should these complex cultural processes be conceptualized? What are the best empirical ways to study social meaning? Even as debates rage around these field-specific theoretical and methodological questions, a broadly cultural sensibility has spread into every arena of sociological study, illuminating how struggles over meaning affect the most disparate processes of contemporary social life.Bringing together the best of these studies and debates, the American Journal of Cultural Sociology (AJCS) publicly crystallizes the cultural turn in contemporary sociology. By providing a common forum for the many voices engaged in meaning-centered social inquiry, the AJCS will facilitate communication, sharpen contrasts, sustain clarity, and allow for periodic condensation and synthesis of different perspectives. The journal aims to provide a single space where cultural sociologists can follow the latest developments and debates within the field. The American Journal of Cultural Sociology is indexed by SCOPUS, a database listing journals and country scientific indicators and rankings, and is also indexed in Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science Core Collection, in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). SSCI provides searchable author abstracts for the leading journals in 55 social science disciplines, with a comprehensive backfile of cited reference data from 1900 to the present. AJCS’s inclusion in the SSCI provides greater discoverability for the journal and allows for real-time insight into the citation performance.We welcome high quality submissions of any length and focus: contemporary and historical studies, macro and micro, institutional and symbolic, ethnographic and statistical, philosophical and methodological. Contemporary cultural sociology has developed from European and American roots, and today is an international field. The AJCS will publish rigorous, meaning-centered sociology whatever its origins and focus, and will distribute it around the world.