Scholar activism benefits science and society

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1038/s44159-024-00319-8
José M. Causadias, Leoandra Onnie Rogers, Linda P. Juang, Tiffany Yip
{"title":"Scholar activism benefits science and society","authors":"José M. Causadias, Leoandra Onnie Rogers, Linda P. Juang, Tiffany Yip","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00319-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An artificial boundary is often drawn between research and activism, but scholar activism can be good for science and for society when it centres the needs of people who are multiply marginalized — especially during the current climate crisis.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"3 6","pages":"370-371"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00319-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An artificial boundary is often drawn between research and activism, but scholar activism can be good for science and for society when it centres the needs of people who are multiply marginalized — especially during the current climate crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学者行动主义有益于科学和社会
研究与激进主义之间往往存在着人为的界限,但当学者的激进主义以那些被多重边缘化的人们的需求为中心时,对科学和社会都是有益的,尤其是在当前的气候危机中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to ‘Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate’ Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate Reply to ‘Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization’ Attachment as a target mechanism in the mental health of child refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1