Cow age, resilience and productivity of cow–calf systems

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Production Science Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1071/an23419
Amir Gil Sessim, Tamara Esteves de Oliveira, Gabriel Ribas Pereira, Fredy Andrey López González, Fabiana Moro Maidana, Daniele Zago, Concepta Margaret McManus, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos
{"title":"Cow age, resilience and productivity of cow–calf systems","authors":"Amir Gil Sessim, Tamara Esteves de Oliveira, Gabriel Ribas Pereira, Fredy Andrey López González, Fabiana Moro Maidana, Daniele Zago, Concepta Margaret McManus, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos","doi":"10.1071/an23419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The energy availability for cow–calf systems is related to climate disturbances, and energy use is influenced by the age of the cows. Both factors determine the productivity and resilience of herds after climate disruption.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>Identify the time needed for the herds composed of cows of a varying age to achieve resilience after energy restriction in the pre- and postpartum.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>The resilience of systems was compared by deterministic dynamic simulation and herds were considered initially stable but different in (1) energy availability for all herd in the first year of production, namely at 50% (low, L), 75% (medium, M) of 100% (high, H) of the requirements according to the NRC (2000, 2016), with these energy levels being restricted to 60 days before and 60 days after the birth, and (2) the maximum age of the cull cow (lifetime, LT), namely 4 (LT4L, LT4M, LT4H), 6 (LT6L, LT6M, LT6H) of 11 (LT11L, LT11M, LT11H) years. From the second year, availability returned to meet the energy requirements of all animals. The availability of energy for the herd was simulated in natural and cultivated pasture. The productivity was determined as the relation between the kilograms of animals sold and the area used for production over a productive cycle. The system model was considered resilient when 95% of the standard productivity was reached (prior to energy restriction).</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>The time required to return to stability was 2 years in the LT6 and LT11, whereas LT4 required 3 years. Furthermore, LT6 had a higher productivity than did the other herds. The older the culled cow was, the greater was the change in the composition of the product commercialised.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>Cows with an intermediate culling age allowed a sustainable intensification of the system, because they showed better productivity than did older cull cows. Furthermore, after climate disturbance, they presented more resilience than did younger cull cows. The level of energy restriction did not directly influence the time to resilience within each evaluated discard-age group.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>Herds that culled females before reaching adult age are less resilient after disturbances, such as changes in climate or changes of any nature that interfere with reproductive rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7895,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an23419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The energy availability for cow–calf systems is related to climate disturbances, and energy use is influenced by the age of the cows. Both factors determine the productivity and resilience of herds after climate disruption.

Aims

Identify the time needed for the herds composed of cows of a varying age to achieve resilience after energy restriction in the pre- and postpartum.

Methods

The resilience of systems was compared by deterministic dynamic simulation and herds were considered initially stable but different in (1) energy availability for all herd in the first year of production, namely at 50% (low, L), 75% (medium, M) of 100% (high, H) of the requirements according to the NRC (2000, 2016), with these energy levels being restricted to 60 days before and 60 days after the birth, and (2) the maximum age of the cull cow (lifetime, LT), namely 4 (LT4L, LT4M, LT4H), 6 (LT6L, LT6M, LT6H) of 11 (LT11L, LT11M, LT11H) years. From the second year, availability returned to meet the energy requirements of all animals. The availability of energy for the herd was simulated in natural and cultivated pasture. The productivity was determined as the relation between the kilograms of animals sold and the area used for production over a productive cycle. The system model was considered resilient when 95% of the standard productivity was reached (prior to energy restriction).

Key results

The time required to return to stability was 2 years in the LT6 and LT11, whereas LT4 required 3 years. Furthermore, LT6 had a higher productivity than did the other herds. The older the culled cow was, the greater was the change in the composition of the product commercialised.

Conclusions

Cows with an intermediate culling age allowed a sustainable intensification of the system, because they showed better productivity than did older cull cows. Furthermore, after climate disturbance, they presented more resilience than did younger cull cows. The level of energy restriction did not directly influence the time to resilience within each evaluated discard-age group.

Implications

Herds that culled females before reaching adult age are less resilient after disturbances, such as changes in climate or changes of any nature that interfere with reproductive rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛龄、复原力和牛-牛系统的生产力
背景奶牛-小牛系统的能量供应与气候干扰有关,而能量的使用则受奶牛年龄的影响。这两个因素决定了牛群在气候干扰后的生产力和恢复力。目的确定由不同年龄奶牛组成的牛群在产前和产后受到能量限制后实现恢复力所需的时间。方法通过确定性动态模拟对系统的恢复能力进行比较,牛群被认为最初是稳定的,但在以下方面存在差异:(1) 所有牛群在生产第一年的能量供应,即 50%(低,L)、75%(中,M)和 100%(高,H)的能量供应、(2) 淘汰牛的最大年龄(终生,LT),即 4(LT4L,LT4M,LT4H)、6(LT6L,LT6M,LT6H)和 11(LT11L,LT11M,LT11H)岁。从第二年开始,能量供应恢复到满足所有动物的能量需求。牧群的能量供应是在天然草场和人工草场上模拟的。生产率是指在一个生产周期内出售的牲畜公斤数与用于生产的面积之间的关系。当达到标准生产率的 95%时(能源限制之前),系统模型被认为具有恢复能力。主要结果LT6和LT11恢复稳定所需的时间为2年,而LT4需要3年。此外,LT6的生产力高于其他牛群。淘汰奶牛的年龄越大,商品化产品成分的变化就越大。结论中等淘汰年龄的奶牛比年龄较大的淘汰奶牛具有更高的生产率,因此可以实现系统的可持续集约化。此外,在受到气候干扰后,它们比年轻的淘汰奶牛表现出更强的适应能力。能量限制水平并不直接影响每个被评估的淘汰年龄组的恢复时间。意义在达到成年年龄之前淘汰雌性母牛的牛群在受到干扰(如气候变化或任何干扰繁殖率的变化)后的恢复力较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the apparent ileal digestible amino acid contents of canola meal for broilers from crude protein content Undegradable dietary protein limits growth and carcass yields in crossbred Boer kids fed Desmanthus hay or Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay supplemented with urea and/or cottonseed meal Regional differences in beef cattle trade and movements associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia Probiotics effects on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens Growth performance and meat quality of finishing pigs fed diets supplemented with antioxidants and organic acids in late summer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1