Knowledge sharing and NPD performance for UK cross – border M&A firms: the moderating role of behavior and outcome controls

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1108/jbim-03-2023-0151
Hanna Lee, Ki-Hyun Um
{"title":"Knowledge sharing and NPD performance for UK cross – border M&A firms: the moderating role of behavior and outcome controls","authors":"Hanna Lee, Ki-Hyun Um","doi":"10.1108/jbim-03-2023-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to explore how the effect of knowledge sharing through mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) on new product development (NPD) performance is contingent upon two different types of control mechanisms: behavior control and outcome control.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Leveraging the theory from transaction cost economics, this study provides answers regarding the roles of behavior and outcome controls. The hypotheses were tested empirically across a sample of 143 UK cross-border M&amp;A firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results provide the increasing call for an integrative perspective and theory in the M&amp;A literature in that knowledge sharing through M&amp;As is deemed decisive for NPD performance, and while both control mechanisms are effective, behavior control is more effective in enhancing NPD performance than outcome control.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The relevant M&amp;A studies lack insights into the use of control mechanisms as a way to monitor the target firm’s behavior and performance and reduce the risk of its opportunistic behavior. Appreciating the need for M&amp;A literature that elaborates control strategy and structure, this study incorporates behavior control and outcome control into M&amp;A mechanisms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-03-2023-0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore how the effect of knowledge sharing through mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on new product development (NPD) performance is contingent upon two different types of control mechanisms: behavior control and outcome control.

Design/methodology/approach

Leveraging the theory from transaction cost economics, this study provides answers regarding the roles of behavior and outcome controls. The hypotheses were tested empirically across a sample of 143 UK cross-border M&A firms.

Findings

The results provide the increasing call for an integrative perspective and theory in the M&A literature in that knowledge sharing through M&As is deemed decisive for NPD performance, and while both control mechanisms are effective, behavior control is more effective in enhancing NPD performance than outcome control.

Originality/value

The relevant M&A studies lack insights into the use of control mechanisms as a way to monitor the target firm’s behavior and performance and reduce the risk of its opportunistic behavior. Appreciating the need for M&A literature that elaborates control strategy and structure, this study incorporates behavior control and outcome control into M&A mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国跨国并购企业的知识共享与新产品开发绩效:行为和结果控制的调节作用
目的本文旨在探讨通过并购(M&As)实现知识共享对新产品开发(NPD)绩效的影响如何取决于两种不同类型的控制机制:行为控制和结果控制。在 143 家英国跨境 M&A 公司的样本中,对假设进行了实证检验。研究结果研究结果表明,通过 M&A 进行知识共享被认为对 NPD 业绩具有决定性作用,而且虽然两种控制机制都很有效,但行为控制比结果控制更能有效提高 NPD 业绩,这为 M&A 文献提供了越来越多的综合视角和理论。有鉴于此,本研究将行为控制和结果控制纳入 M&A 机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
25.80%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (JBIM) publishes research on new ideas concerning business-to-business marketing, that is, how one company or organization markets its goods/services/ideas to another company or organization. It is a valuable source for academics, directors and executives of marketing, providing them with new, fresh insights which are applicable within real life settings. JBIM''s emphasis on insistence of proof is one of the cornerstones of its success and its reputation. Contributors to the journal must not only present new theories or ideas, but also back them up with research. In the process, many myths are exploded, philosophies reinvented and the scene set for topical debate on critical issues in B2B marketing. The B2B landscape evolves and so does the research that explores the emerging features and properties of B2B markets. From 2019 the journal hosts the IMP Forum that invites research advancing the boundaries of B2B marketing. Prior research has evidenced that interactivity and interdependences characterize interorganizational business relationships. The Forum aims to bring out research that explores interactivity and interdependences in business relationships and their implications for marketing management, business development and for society at large. Coverage: -Competition and cooperation- Networks in business markets- Buyer behaviour – purchasing and supply management- Managing product offerings- New product development and innovation- Networks in business markets- Distribution and routes to market- Market and customer communication - Customer relationship management- Sales and key account management- Organizing for global markets -
期刊最新文献
The effect of standardized advertising, managerial ties and born global orientation on export performance The effects of the functional and geographical breadth of collaborations on radical innovation performance: the moderating role of firm size Toward a sustainable future: integrating circular economy in the digitally advanced supply chain Third actor introductions to interaction episodes aiming at fast-forwarding new firm relationship development Information sharing in a green supply chain: a bane or a boon?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1