Outdoor Environmental Educators’ Views on Learning in Light of Integral Theory

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Experiential Education Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1177/10538259241252814
Steph N. Dean, Josep Gallifa
{"title":"Outdoor Environmental Educators’ Views on Learning in Light of Integral Theory","authors":"Steph N. Dean, Josep Gallifa","doi":"10.1177/10538259241252814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Outdoor environmental education (OEE) is an effective learning approach that helps prepare students to address the complex problems currently facing our world. Integral theory (IT) is a comprehensive framework that acknowledges the interconnectedness between self, society, and the environment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the presence of four categories derived of IT – subjective, objective, intersubjective, interobjective – within OEE and to investigate the extent to which outdoor environmental educators consider learning experiences as a contribution to integral development. Methodology: Using discourse analysis, we analyzed 23 interviews from twelve outdoor environmental educators. We employed a deductive approach as we looked for evidence of IT categories and then adopted an inductive approach while analyzing participants’ discourse for general patterns related to IT and integral human development. Findings: The four categories of IT are illustrated within OEE experiences to varying degrees of representation. Outdoor environmental educators consider learning experiences as a contribution to integral development, regularly employing systems thinking, and mindfulness, among others. Implications: The findings from our study indicate a connection between OEE, teacher sensemaking, and integral education. Furthermore, OEE can be a way to facilitate integral human development, contributing to future understandings within education fields.","PeriodicalId":46775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experiential Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experiential Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259241252814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outdoor environmental education (OEE) is an effective learning approach that helps prepare students to address the complex problems currently facing our world. Integral theory (IT) is a comprehensive framework that acknowledges the interconnectedness between self, society, and the environment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the presence of four categories derived of IT – subjective, objective, intersubjective, interobjective – within OEE and to investigate the extent to which outdoor environmental educators consider learning experiences as a contribution to integral development. Methodology: Using discourse analysis, we analyzed 23 interviews from twelve outdoor environmental educators. We employed a deductive approach as we looked for evidence of IT categories and then adopted an inductive approach while analyzing participants’ discourse for general patterns related to IT and integral human development. Findings: The four categories of IT are illustrated within OEE experiences to varying degrees of representation. Outdoor environmental educators consider learning experiences as a contribution to integral development, regularly employing systems thinking, and mindfulness, among others. Implications: The findings from our study indicate a connection between OEE, teacher sensemaking, and integral education. Furthermore, OEE can be a way to facilitate integral human development, contributing to future understandings within education fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
户外环境教育工作者对综合理论学习的看法
背景:户外环境教育(OEE)是一种有效的学习方法,有助于学生为解决当前世界面临的复杂问题做好准备。综合理论(IT)是一个全面的框架,承认自我、社会和环境之间的相互联系。目的:本研究的目的是检查户外环境教育中是否存在源自 IT 的四个类别--主观、客观、主体间、主体间--并调查户外环境教育者在多大程度上将学习经验视为对整体发展的贡献。研究方法:我们使用话语分析法分析了来自 12 位户外环境教育者的 23 个访谈。我们采用演绎法寻找信息技术类别的证据,然后采用归纳法分析参与者的话语,寻找与信息技术和人类整体发展相关的一般模式。研究结果:信息技术的四个类别在户外环境教育经验中都有不同程度的体现。户外环境教育者认为,学习经历是对人的全面发展的一种贡献,他们经常采用系统思维和正念等方法。影响:我们的研究结果表明,户外环境教育、教师的感性认识和整体教育之间存在联系。此外,户外环境教育可以成为促进人类整体发展的一种方式,有助于未来对教育领域的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experiential Education
Journal of Experiential Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experiential Education (JEE) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing refereed articles on experiential education in diverse contexts. The JEE provides a forum for the empirical and theoretical study of issues concerning experiential learning, program management and policies, educational, developmental, and health outcomes, teaching and facilitation, and research methodology. The JEE is a publication of the Association for Experiential Education. The Journal welcomes submissions from established and emerging scholars writing about experiential education in the context of outdoor adventure programming, service learning, environmental education, classroom instruction, mental and behavioral health, organizational settings, the creative arts, international travel, community programs, or others.
期刊最新文献
Do You See What I See? Examining College Internships From Both the Intern and Supervisor Perspectives Positive Youth Development at Sea: A Case Study of the Shenandoah Model “Wind Therapy” Motorcycling by U.S. Veterans During COVID-19: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Letter from the Editor A Prospective Evaluation of the Effects of Outdoor Adventure Training Programs on Work-Related Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1