Exploring the combination of individual and organizational–environmental factors in the expression of radical and incremental creativity

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Human Resource Development Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1002/hrdq.21531
Suk Jung, Ah Jeong Hong
{"title":"Exploring the combination of individual and organizational–environmental factors in the expression of radical and incremental creativity","authors":"Suk Jung, Ah Jeong Hong","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative products and services are key factors in corporate competitiveness, and the expression “employee creativity” is the top priority factor in leading corporate innovation. This study aims to investigate the differences between the predictive variables for the expression of radical and incremental creativity and the combinations of the predictive variables, which aid in the expression of two types of creativity. A research survey was conducted with 600 employees working in newspaper, broadcasting, and film businesses. The results were derived by conducting a fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) on 513 useful samples. Using necessity and sufficiency analysis of a fs/QCA, the results indicate that the three personal factors—job expertise, creative process engagement, and work engagement—are commonly required for two types of creativity. Conversely, organizational–environmental factors, a risk‐taking climate, and external networking behavior are only predictive variables of radical creativity. This study's results provide insights regarding the personal and environmental resources that employees must secure to express radical and incremental creativity. Because a clear difference was found in the factors required for the expression of the two types of creativity, based on the results of this study, Human Resource Development(HRD) can devise an effective method to support the expression of the two types of differential creativity.","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative products and services are key factors in corporate competitiveness, and the expression “employee creativity” is the top priority factor in leading corporate innovation. This study aims to investigate the differences between the predictive variables for the expression of radical and incremental creativity and the combinations of the predictive variables, which aid in the expression of two types of creativity. A research survey was conducted with 600 employees working in newspaper, broadcasting, and film businesses. The results were derived by conducting a fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) on 513 useful samples. Using necessity and sufficiency analysis of a fs/QCA, the results indicate that the three personal factors—job expertise, creative process engagement, and work engagement—are commonly required for two types of creativity. Conversely, organizational–environmental factors, a risk‐taking climate, and external networking behavior are only predictive variables of radical creativity. This study's results provide insights regarding the personal and environmental resources that employees must secure to express radical and incremental creativity. Because a clear difference was found in the factors required for the expression of the two types of creativity, based on the results of this study, Human Resource Development(HRD) can devise an effective method to support the expression of the two types of differential creativity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索个人与组织环境因素在激进和渐进式创造力表现中的结合
创新产品和服务是企业竞争力的关键因素,而 "员工创造力 "的表达则是引领企业创新的首要因素。本研究旨在探讨激进型创造力和渐进型创造力表达的预测变量之间的差异,以及有助于两种创造力表达的预测变量组合。我们对报业、广播业和电影业的 600 名员工进行了研究调查。通过对 513 个有用样本进行模糊集定性比较分析(fs/QCA)得出了结果。通过对 fs/QCA 进行必要性和充分性分析,结果表明,两种类型的创造力通常需要三个个人因素--工作专长、创造过程参与度和工作参与度。相反,组织环境因素、冒险氛围和外部网络行为只是激进创造力的预测变量。本研究的结果提供了有关员工为表达激进型和渐进型创造力而必须确保的个人和环境资源的见解。由于两种创造力的表现所需的因素存在明显差异,人力资源开发部门(HRD)可以根据本研究的结果设计出一种有效的方法来支持两种不同创造力的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Information for Contributors A reflective provocation on generativity and human resource development Bridging human resource development processes through generative Artificial Intelligence How remote workers manage loneliness and performance: Virtual social interaction as an alternative resource management strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1