Improving the mechanical performance of railway concrete sleepers using recycled materials: An experimental and numerical study

Jun Wang, Mohammad Siahkouhi, Yunchang Du, Gang Huang, Xiaodong Han, Guoqing Jing
{"title":"Improving the mechanical performance of railway concrete sleepers using recycled materials: An experimental and numerical study","authors":"Jun Wang, Mohammad Siahkouhi, Yunchang Du, Gang Huang, Xiaodong Han, Guoqing Jing","doi":"10.1177/09544097241241356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the use of three waste materials available in vast quantities, including waste tires, glass bottles and bamboo furniture, in the manufacture of railway sleepers. Mechanical properties of recycled concrete have been studied to establish an optimal mix suitable for concrete railway sleeper manufacturing. Thus, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% recycled rubber sands (RRS) by volume of fine aggregate are used instead of 30# and 60# mesh sizes of fine aggregate. Moreover, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of aggregate volume are replaced by recycled glass aggregate (RGA) particles. Furthermore, different percentages of recycled bamboo fibers (RBF) have been used as 1%, 2% and 3% by volume of concrete. According to the optimal concrete mixtures of RRS, RGA and RBF, twelve concrete railway sleepers are manufactured and tested for middle and rail seat bending strengths. Results show that ref. sleeper has almost 16% and 24% lower strengths than RGA sleeper in middle and rail seat, respectively, while ref. sleeper have higher strengths by 16% and 13%, and 18% and 7% than RRS sleeper (M60-R5) and RBF sleeper (B2) in middle and rail seat, respectively. The FEM results show that the ([Formula: see text]) of the RGA sleeper is the minimum ratio by 1.11 and 1.13 for rail seat and middle of sleeper, respectively, which is the best performance. In RBF sleeper FEM model, Bamboo fiber can only bear 5% and 8% of total stress in middle and rail seat, respectively, due to low mechanical properties of fibers.","PeriodicalId":54567,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F-Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit","volume":"206 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F-Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097241241356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the use of three waste materials available in vast quantities, including waste tires, glass bottles and bamboo furniture, in the manufacture of railway sleepers. Mechanical properties of recycled concrete have been studied to establish an optimal mix suitable for concrete railway sleeper manufacturing. Thus, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% recycled rubber sands (RRS) by volume of fine aggregate are used instead of 30# and 60# mesh sizes of fine aggregate. Moreover, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of aggregate volume are replaced by recycled glass aggregate (RGA) particles. Furthermore, different percentages of recycled bamboo fibers (RBF) have been used as 1%, 2% and 3% by volume of concrete. According to the optimal concrete mixtures of RRS, RGA and RBF, twelve concrete railway sleepers are manufactured and tested for middle and rail seat bending strengths. Results show that ref. sleeper has almost 16% and 24% lower strengths than RGA sleeper in middle and rail seat, respectively, while ref. sleeper have higher strengths by 16% and 13%, and 18% and 7% than RRS sleeper (M60-R5) and RBF sleeper (B2) in middle and rail seat, respectively. The FEM results show that the ([Formula: see text]) of the RGA sleeper is the minimum ratio by 1.11 and 1.13 for rail seat and middle of sleeper, respectively, which is the best performance. In RBF sleeper FEM model, Bamboo fiber can only bear 5% and 8% of total stress in middle and rail seat, respectively, due to low mechanical properties of fibers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用回收材料提高铁路混凝土枕木的机械性能:实验和数值研究
本文探讨了利用废轮胎、玻璃瓶和竹制家具等三种大量存在的废弃材料制造铁路枕木的问题。通过研究再生混凝土的机械性能,确定了适用于混凝土轨枕制造的最佳混合物。因此,按体积计算,使用 5%、10%、15% 和 20%的再生橡胶砂(RRS)代替 30# 和 60# 目尺寸的细骨料。此外,20%、40%、60%、80% 和 100%的骨料用再生玻璃骨料(RGA)颗粒代替。此外,还使用了不同比例的再生竹纤维(RBF),占混凝土体积的 1%、2% 和 3%。根据 RRS、RGA 和 RBF 的最佳混凝土混合物,制造了 12 根混凝土铁路枕木,并测试了中间和轨座的抗弯强度。结果表明,参考轨枕的中间和轨枕强度分别比 RGA 轨枕低近 16% 和 24%,而参考轨枕的中间和轨枕强度分别比 RRS 轨枕(M60-R5)和 RBF 轨枕(B2)高 16% 和 13%,以及 18% 和 7%。有限元分析结果表明,RGA轨枕的([计算公式:见正文])比值最小,在轨座和轨枕中部分别为1.11和1.13,性能最佳。在 RBF 轨枕有限元模型中,由于竹纤维的机械性能较低,其在轨枕中部和轨枕座上只能分别承受总应力的 5%和 8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit is devoted to engineering in its widest interpretation applicable to rail and rapid transit. The Journal aims to promote sharing of technical knowledge, ideas and experience between engineers and researchers working in the railway field.
期刊最新文献
The influence of semi-actively controlled magnetorheological bogie yaw dampers on the guiding behaviour of a railway vehicle in an S-curve: Simulation and on-track test Mechanism and improvement for tail vehicle swaying of power-centralized EMUs Long railway track modelling – A parallel computing approach Research on ultrasonic guided wave-based high-speed turnout switch rail base flaw detection Ballast stiffness estimation based on measurements during dynamic track stabilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1