In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Ecclesiastical Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1017/s0956618x2400022x
David Etherington
{"title":"In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective","authors":"David Etherington","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2400022x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origins of this comment lie in Charles George KC's article: ‘Do we still need the faculty system?’<jats:sup>1</jats:sup> which came towards the end of his tenure of office as Dean of the Arches and Auditor (2009–2020). George himself acknowledged that his conclusion, namely that a no-holds-barred review of the faculty system would now be appropriate, might come as ‘rather a surprise’ and that some might have expected his answer to his own question to be in the affirmative: namely, that <jats:italic>we do</jats:italic> still need a faculty system.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2400022x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The origins of this comment lie in Charles George KC's article: ‘Do we still need the faculty system?’1 which came towards the end of his tenure of office as Dean of the Arches and Auditor (2009–2020). George himself acknowledged that his conclusion, namely that a no-holds-barred review of the faculty system would now be appropriate, might come as ‘rather a surprise’ and that some might have expected his answer to his own question to be in the affirmative: namely, that we do still need a faculty system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为大法官辩护:个人观点
这一评论源于 Charles George KC 的一篇文章:我们还需要院系制度吗?"1 一文,该文发表于查尔斯-乔治 KC 担任凯旋门学院院长和审计员(2009-2020 年)的任期即将结束之时。乔治自己也承认,他的结论,即现在应该对教员制度进行无保留的审查,可能 "相当令人吃惊",有些人可能以为他对自己问题的回答是肯定的:即我们仍然需要教员制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
When a doctrine is not a doctrine: understating the intersection of civil and canon law and the ‘doctrine’ of marriage in the Anglican Church of Australia Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax In defence of the Chancellor: a personal perspective Re St Thomas the Apostle, Killinghall Re St Anselm's Church, Kennington Cross
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1