Immature oocyte proportion in a cohort led to poor embryo development but did not reduce clinical pregnancy rate

IF 1.6 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Middle East Fertility Society Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1186/s43043-024-00179-5
Nining Handayani, Ayu Mulia Sundari, Tri Aprilliana, Arief Boediono, Arie A. Polim, Budi Wiweko, Batara Sirait, Ivan Sini
{"title":"Immature oocyte proportion in a cohort led to poor embryo development but did not reduce clinical pregnancy rate","authors":"Nining Handayani, Ayu Mulia Sundari, Tri Aprilliana, Arief Boediono, Arie A. Polim, Budi Wiweko, Batara Sirait, Ivan Sini","doi":"10.1186/s43043-024-00179-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the effects of immature oocyte proportion in a cohort on both IVF laboratory and clinical outcomes. This retrospective cohort study took place at Morula IVF Jakarta Clinic from January 2016 to July 2020. A total of 1.826 couples undergoing IVF-ICSI/IMSI were included and classified into four groups according to the proportion of immature oocytes retrieved during OPU as follows: (1) immature ≤ 15% (n = 1.064), (2) immature 16–25% (n = 369), (3) immature 26–50% (n = 331), and (4) immature > 50% (n = 62). Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage. Embryology laboratory results were assessed as the secondary outcomes. Statistical analyses were carried out utilizing Kruskal–Wallis or chi-square tests. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Increased proportion of immature oocytes in a cohort was significantly associated with body mass index, tubal factors, and estradiol level on trigger day (p < 0.05). Neither clinical pregnancy nor miscarriage was associated with the immature oocyte proportion (adjusted p-value = 0.872 and p = 0.345, respectively). However, a higher proportion of immature oocytes significantly reduced the total number of fertilized oocytes, number of top-quality cleavages, and blastocysts (p < 0.001). Furthermore, embryo transfer cancelation rates due to poor embryo quality were elevated significantly. Despite overall poor embryo development in the laboratory, our study seems to suggest that the proportion of immature oocytes in a cohort has no impact on clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rate in IVF program.","PeriodicalId":18532,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Fertility Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-024-00179-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of immature oocyte proportion in a cohort on both IVF laboratory and clinical outcomes. This retrospective cohort study took place at Morula IVF Jakarta Clinic from January 2016 to July 2020. A total of 1.826 couples undergoing IVF-ICSI/IMSI were included and classified into four groups according to the proportion of immature oocytes retrieved during OPU as follows: (1) immature ≤ 15% (n = 1.064), (2) immature 16–25% (n = 369), (3) immature 26–50% (n = 331), and (4) immature > 50% (n = 62). Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage. Embryology laboratory results were assessed as the secondary outcomes. Statistical analyses were carried out utilizing Kruskal–Wallis or chi-square tests. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Increased proportion of immature oocytes in a cohort was significantly associated with body mass index, tubal factors, and estradiol level on trigger day (p < 0.05). Neither clinical pregnancy nor miscarriage was associated with the immature oocyte proportion (adjusted p-value = 0.872 and p = 0.345, respectively). However, a higher proportion of immature oocytes significantly reduced the total number of fertilized oocytes, number of top-quality cleavages, and blastocysts (p < 0.001). Furthermore, embryo transfer cancelation rates due to poor embryo quality were elevated significantly. Despite overall poor embryo development in the laboratory, our study seems to suggest that the proportion of immature oocytes in a cohort has no impact on clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rate in IVF program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
队列中的未成熟卵母细胞比例会导致胚胎发育不良,但不会降低临床妊娠率
本研究旨在评估队列中未成熟卵母细胞比例对试管婴儿实验室和临床结果的影响。这项回顾性队列研究于2016年1月至2020年7月在雅加达Morula IVF诊所进行。共纳入了1 826对接受IVF-ICSI/IMSI的夫妇,并根据OPU期间取回的未成熟卵母细胞比例分为以下四组:(1)未成熟≤15%(n = 1.064),(2)未成熟 16-25%(n = 369),(3)未成熟 26-50%(n = 331),(4)未成熟>50%(n = 62)。主要结果为临床妊娠和流产。胚胎学实验室结果作为次要结果进行评估。统计分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 或卡方检验,P 值小于 0.05 为具有统计学意义。队列中未成熟卵母细胞比例的增加与体重指数、输卵管因素和触发日的雌二醇水平显著相关(p < 0.05)。临床妊娠和流产均与未成熟卵母细胞比例无关(调整后的 p 值分别为 0.872 和 p = 0.345)。然而,未成熟卵母细胞比例越高,受精卵母细胞总数、优质裂殖数和囊胚数都会显著减少(p < 0.001)。此外,由于胚胎质量差而导致的胚胎移植取消率也明显升高。尽管实验室中的胚胎发育总体较差,但我们的研究似乎表明,在试管婴儿项目中,队列中未成熟卵母细胞的比例对临床妊娠和流产率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness and adverse effects of oral versus transdermal estradiol for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial The effect of vitamin D on the hormonal profile of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Semen in the time of COVID-19: a narrative review of current evidence and implications for fertility and reproductive health From uncertain to certain—how to proceed with variants of uncertain significance Stigma and depression among obese infertile women: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1