Andrew Nguyen, Keita Ebisu, Rupa Basu, Nico Schulte, Scott A. Epstein, Xiangmei Wu
{"title":"Subdaily PM2.5 exposure and cardiorespiratory risks: data and findings from Southern California, 2018–2020","authors":"Andrew Nguyen, Keita Ebisu, Rupa Basu, Nico Schulte, Scott A. Epstein, Xiangmei Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01583-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements become more accessible, health impacts from subdaily exposures can be evaluated to develop health guidance. We obtained hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations covering Southern California from May 2018 through March 2020 and daily emergency department visits (EDVs) for cardiorespiratory-related conditions at ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) levels. ZCTAs were aggregated into 35 clusters based on similar geographic and sociodemographic features. Daily exceedance concentration hours (DECH) above 9, 12, and 15 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, daily maximum, and average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were calculated for each cluster-day. Two-stage time-series analyses were conducted to estimate excess risks of daily EDVs. DECH metrics exhibited the same direction but smaller effects on cardiovascular and respiratory EDVs compared to daily average metrics. Excess risks for cardiovascular EDVs were 1.77% (95% CI: 1.20, 2.34), 1.04% (0.61, 1.47), and 2.67% (1.98, 3.37) per interquartile range increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> during 7-day lag period, respectively. Excess risks of respiratory EDVs increased by 6.34% (4.25, 8.48), 4.39% (2.85, 5.95), and 6.61% (4.78, 8.47) per IQR increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> during a 3-day lag period, respectively. Elevated excess risks were observed among older adults (65+), children (0–17), and low-poverty neighborhoods on both subdaily and daily metrics. In summary, subdaily PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures above the current standards exhibited excess risks in cardiorespiratory-related EDVs but no greater than those derived from the daily average metric. Health guidance based on the daily average metric provides sensible protection to the public in Southern California.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 11","pages":"2431 - 2444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01583-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As hourly PM2.5 measurements become more accessible, health impacts from subdaily exposures can be evaluated to develop health guidance. We obtained hourly PM2.5 concentrations covering Southern California from May 2018 through March 2020 and daily emergency department visits (EDVs) for cardiorespiratory-related conditions at ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) levels. ZCTAs were aggregated into 35 clusters based on similar geographic and sociodemographic features. Daily exceedance concentration hours (DECH) above 9, 12, and 15 µg/m3, daily maximum, and average PM2.5 concentrations were calculated for each cluster-day. Two-stage time-series analyses were conducted to estimate excess risks of daily EDVs. DECH metrics exhibited the same direction but smaller effects on cardiovascular and respiratory EDVs compared to daily average metrics. Excess risks for cardiovascular EDVs were 1.77% (95% CI: 1.20, 2.34), 1.04% (0.61, 1.47), and 2.67% (1.98, 3.37) per interquartile range increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM2.5 during 7-day lag period, respectively. Excess risks of respiratory EDVs increased by 6.34% (4.25, 8.48), 4.39% (2.85, 5.95), and 6.61% (4.78, 8.47) per IQR increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM2.5 during a 3-day lag period, respectively. Elevated excess risks were observed among older adults (65+), children (0–17), and low-poverty neighborhoods on both subdaily and daily metrics. In summary, subdaily PM2.5 exposures above the current standards exhibited excess risks in cardiorespiratory-related EDVs but no greater than those derived from the daily average metric. Health guidance based on the daily average metric provides sensible protection to the public in Southern California.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.