Subdaily PM2.5 exposure and cardiorespiratory risks: data and findings from Southern California, 2018–2020

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Air Quality Atmosphere and Health Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s11869-024-01583-6
Andrew Nguyen, Keita Ebisu, Rupa Basu, Nico Schulte, Scott A. Epstein, Xiangmei Wu
{"title":"Subdaily PM2.5 exposure and cardiorespiratory risks: data and findings from Southern California, 2018–2020","authors":"Andrew Nguyen,&nbsp;Keita Ebisu,&nbsp;Rupa Basu,&nbsp;Nico Schulte,&nbsp;Scott A. Epstein,&nbsp;Xiangmei Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01583-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements become more accessible, health impacts from subdaily exposures can be evaluated to develop health guidance. We obtained hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations covering Southern California from May 2018 through March 2020 and daily emergency department visits (EDVs) for cardiorespiratory-related conditions at ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) levels. ZCTAs were aggregated into 35 clusters based on similar geographic and sociodemographic features. Daily exceedance concentration hours (DECH) above 9, 12, and 15 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, daily maximum, and average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were calculated for each cluster-day. Two-stage time-series analyses were conducted to estimate excess risks of daily EDVs. DECH metrics exhibited the same direction but smaller effects on cardiovascular and respiratory EDVs compared to daily average metrics. Excess risks for cardiovascular EDVs were 1.77% (95% CI: 1.20, 2.34), 1.04% (0.61, 1.47), and 2.67% (1.98, 3.37) per interquartile range increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> during 7-day lag period, respectively. Excess risks of respiratory EDVs increased by 6.34% (4.25, 8.48), 4.39% (2.85, 5.95), and 6.61% (4.78, 8.47) per IQR increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> during a 3-day lag period, respectively. Elevated excess risks were observed among older adults (65+), children (0–17), and low-poverty neighborhoods on both subdaily and daily metrics. In summary, subdaily PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures above the current standards exhibited excess risks in cardiorespiratory-related EDVs but no greater than those derived from the daily average metric. Health guidance based on the daily average metric provides sensible protection to the public in Southern California.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 11","pages":"2431 - 2444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01583-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As hourly PM2.5 measurements become more accessible, health impacts from subdaily exposures can be evaluated to develop health guidance. We obtained hourly PM2.5 concentrations covering Southern California from May 2018 through March 2020 and daily emergency department visits (EDVs) for cardiorespiratory-related conditions at ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) levels. ZCTAs were aggregated into 35 clusters based on similar geographic and sociodemographic features. Daily exceedance concentration hours (DECH) above 9, 12, and 15 µg/m3, daily maximum, and average PM2.5 concentrations were calculated for each cluster-day. Two-stage time-series analyses were conducted to estimate excess risks of daily EDVs. DECH metrics exhibited the same direction but smaller effects on cardiovascular and respiratory EDVs compared to daily average metrics. Excess risks for cardiovascular EDVs were 1.77% (95% CI: 1.20, 2.34), 1.04% (0.61, 1.47), and 2.67% (1.98, 3.37) per interquartile range increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM2.5 during 7-day lag period, respectively. Excess risks of respiratory EDVs increased by 6.34% (4.25, 8.48), 4.39% (2.85, 5.95), and 6.61% (4.78, 8.47) per IQR increase of DECH-9, DECH-12, and daily average PM2.5 during a 3-day lag period, respectively. Elevated excess risks were observed among older adults (65+), children (0–17), and low-poverty neighborhoods on both subdaily and daily metrics. In summary, subdaily PM2.5 exposures above the current standards exhibited excess risks in cardiorespiratory-related EDVs but no greater than those derived from the daily average metric. Health guidance based on the daily average metric provides sensible protection to the public in Southern California.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚日PM2.5暴露与心肺风险:2018-2020年南加州的数据和研究结果
随着每小时 PM2.5 测量值越来越容易获得,可以评估亚日常暴露对健康的影响,从而制定健康指导。我们获得了南加州从 2018 年 5 月到 2020 年 3 月的每小时 PM2.5 浓度,以及邮政编码表区(ZCTA)级别的心肺相关疾病的每日急诊就诊率(EDV)。根据相似的地理和社会人口特征,ZCTA 被聚合成 35 个群组。计算了每个群组日超过 9、12 和 15 µg/m3 的日超标浓度小时数 (DECH)、日最大值和 PM2.5 平均浓度。进行了两阶段时间序列分析,以估算每日 EDV 的超额风险。与日平均指标相比,DECH 指标对心血管和呼吸系统 EDV 的影响方向相同,但影响较小。在7天的滞后期内,DECH-9、DECH-12和PM2.5日平均值每增加1个四分位数,心血管EDV的超额风险分别为1.77%(95% CI:1.20,2.34)、1.04%(0.61,1.47)和2.67%(1.98,3.37)。在3天滞后期,DECH-9、DECH-12和日均PM2.5的IQR每增加1%,呼吸道EDV的超额风险分别增加6.34%(4.25,8.48)、4.39%(2.85,5.95)和6.61%(4.78,8.47)。在老年人(65 岁以上)、儿童(0-17 岁)和低贫困社区中,亚日和日指标都观察到了较高的超额风险。总之,高于现行标准的亚日PM2.5暴露显示出心肺相关EDV的超额风险,但并不比日均指标得出的风险高。基于日均指标的健康指导为南加州公众提供了合理的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
期刊最新文献
AIRQ HARMO21 special issue—PREFACE Long-term changes of surface ozone and ozone sensitivity over the North China Plain based on 2015–2021 satellite retrievals Developing a novel hybrid model based on deep neural networks and discrete wavelet transform algorithm for prediction of daily air temperature The impact of respirable dust exposure on lung function parameters of motorcycle taxi drivers in Bangkok and adjacent provinces, Thailand Ozone production sensitivity in the highland city of Lhasa: a comparative analysis with Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1