Inbuilt age, residence time, and inherited age from radiocarbon dates of modern fires and late Holocene deposits, Western Transverse Ranges, California

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1002/esp.5845
Katherine Scharer, Devin McPhillips, Jenifer Leidelmeijer, Matthew Kirby
{"title":"Inbuilt age, residence time, and inherited age from radiocarbon dates of modern fires and late Holocene deposits, Western Transverse Ranges, California","authors":"Katherine Scharer,&nbsp;Devin McPhillips,&nbsp;Jenifer Leidelmeijer,&nbsp;Matthew Kirby","doi":"10.1002/esp.5845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiocarbon dates from alluvial sections provide maximum deposit ages because of the time lag between formation of the dated material and deposition at the sample site, potentially producing decade- to century-long biases in the dates of historic events, paleoclimatic change, fire histories, and paleoearthquakes. This bias, called the inherited age, combines the inbuilt age distribution, which reflects the age composition of the vegetation of the source area, and the residence time distribution, which includes transport and interim storage prior to final deposition. We tackle inherited age and its components by comparing charcoal dates from two modern fires in southern California, the 2020 Bobcat Fire and the 2013 Grand Fire, with a well-dated late Holocene terrace deposit in the Pallett Creek watershed. Fifty-six radiocarbon dates from the modern fires provide an inbuilt age distribution with a median of 25 years pre-fire (320-year 95% range). An inherited age distribution calculated from 175 terrace deposit dates is older, with a median age of ~90 years (850-year 95% range). Comparing inherited ages calculated from organic-rich versus clastic terrace deposits reveals a slight facies dependence suggesting longer residence times in clastic deposits. We develop a modeled inherited age that incorporates larger calibration uncertainties in pre-1950s samples by combining the modern fire sample distribution with the pre-bomb portion of the calibration curve. The modeled inherited age is younger than the terrace deposit inherited age by only 21 years, indicating inbuilt age, not long residence times, dominates inherited age in this setting. The results imply that paleoearthquakes and climatic event age estimates in the Western Transverse Ranges are up to a century too old. More broadly, dating charcoal from modern fires can constrain inherited age and the resulting distributions can improve the accuracy of dates of past environmental and tectonic events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.5845","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5845","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiocarbon dates from alluvial sections provide maximum deposit ages because of the time lag between formation of the dated material and deposition at the sample site, potentially producing decade- to century-long biases in the dates of historic events, paleoclimatic change, fire histories, and paleoearthquakes. This bias, called the inherited age, combines the inbuilt age distribution, which reflects the age composition of the vegetation of the source area, and the residence time distribution, which includes transport and interim storage prior to final deposition. We tackle inherited age and its components by comparing charcoal dates from two modern fires in southern California, the 2020 Bobcat Fire and the 2013 Grand Fire, with a well-dated late Holocene terrace deposit in the Pallett Creek watershed. Fifty-six radiocarbon dates from the modern fires provide an inbuilt age distribution with a median of 25 years pre-fire (320-year 95% range). An inherited age distribution calculated from 175 terrace deposit dates is older, with a median age of ~90 years (850-year 95% range). Comparing inherited ages calculated from organic-rich versus clastic terrace deposits reveals a slight facies dependence suggesting longer residence times in clastic deposits. We develop a modeled inherited age that incorporates larger calibration uncertainties in pre-1950s samples by combining the modern fire sample distribution with the pre-bomb portion of the calibration curve. The modeled inherited age is younger than the terrace deposit inherited age by only 21 years, indicating inbuilt age, not long residence times, dominates inherited age in this setting. The results imply that paleoearthquakes and climatic event age estimates in the Western Transverse Ranges are up to a century too old. More broadly, dating charcoal from modern fires can constrain inherited age and the resulting distributions can improve the accuracy of dates of past environmental and tectonic events.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从加利福尼亚州西横断山脉现代火灾和全新世晚期沉积物的放射性碳年代中得出的内置年龄、停留时间和继承年龄
冲积层剖面的放射性碳年代可以提供最大的沉积年龄,这是因为年代物质的形成与 样地沉积之间存在时间差,可能会对历史事件、古气候变化、火灾历史和古地震的日期产 生长达十年至百年的偏差。这种偏差被称为 "继承年龄",它是内在年龄分布和停留时间分布的结合,前者反映了来源地区植被的年龄组成,后者包括最终沉积前的运输和临时储存。我们通过比较南加州两次现代火灾(2020 年山猫大火和 2013 年大火)的木炭年代与 Pallett 溪流域全新世晚期阶地沉积物的年代,解决了继承年龄及其组成部分的问题。来自现代火灾的 56 个放射性碳日期提供了一个内在年龄分布,中位数为火灾前 25 年(320 年 95% 的范围)。根据 175 个阶地沉积物日期计算出的继承年龄分布更老,中位年龄约为 90 年(850 年 95% 的范围)。通过比较富含有机质和碎屑岩的阶地沉积计算出的继承年龄,发现两者之间存在轻微的面相依赖关系,这表明碎屑岩沉积的停留时间更长。通过将现代火灾样本分布与校准曲线的爆炸前部分相结合,我们建立了一个模型化的继承年龄,其中包含了 1950 年代前样本中较大的校准不确定性。模型继承年龄比台地沉积物继承年龄仅小 21 年,这表明在这种环境下,主导继承年龄的是固有年龄,而不是较长的停留时间。这些结果表明,西横断山脉的古地震和气候事件年龄估计最多达一个世纪之久。更广泛地说,对现代火灾中的木炭进行测年可以限制继承年龄,由此得出的分布可以提高过去环境和构造事件的日期的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
期刊最新文献
Sounding out the river: Seismic and hydroacoustic monitoring of bedload transport Heuristic estimation of river bathymetry in braided streams using digital image processing Effects of biochar addition or grass planting on infiltrations into a sandy soil in the Loess Plateau in China Detecting the three‐dimensional dynamics of post‐dam sandbars from Sentinel‐2 time‐series images: A case study in the lower Lancang–Mekong River Unveiling the potential of karst vadose deposits in constraining Quaternary tectonic subsidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1