ESG-driven ecopreneur selection in European financial institutions: entropy and TOPSIS analysis

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Management Decision Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1108/md-12-2023-2425
Konstantina Ragazou, Christos Lemonakis, Ioannis Passas, Constantin Zopounidis, Alexandros Garefalakis
{"title":"ESG-driven ecopreneur selection in European financial institutions: entropy and TOPSIS analysis","authors":"Konstantina Ragazou, Christos Lemonakis, Ioannis Passas, Constantin Zopounidis, Alexandros Garefalakis","doi":"10.1108/md-12-2023-2425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This is the application of the Entropy and TOPSIS model to assess the eco-efficiency of European financial institutions using environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies. The aim is to categorize financial institutions based on key factors such as environmental training and management and to examine the alignment between ideal ESG performance and eco-efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study uses environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies to identify and categorize eco-entrepreneurs in European financial institutions. The study utilizes data to examine the structure between environmental training, effective management practices, and the green performance of financial institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study shows that European financial institutions exhibit varying degrees of eco-efficiency as assessed using the Entropy and TOPSIS model applied to ESG strategies. Surprisingly, the study found that institutions with a high ESG performance do not always match those with the highest eco-efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>They emphasize the need for financial institutions to align their operations with sustainable practices. This research provides insights to increase eco-efficiency and improve the ESG performance of financial institutions. It also informs policy and decision-making in these institutions in relation to environmental training and management practices, contributing to the wider dialogue on sustainable finance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This indicates a discrepancy between ESG ratings and actual eco-efficiency, emphasizing the need to reassess the ESG framework. The study findings are crucial for aligning financial institutions with sustainable practices and improving the effectiveness of the ESG framework, especially for institutions at the lower end of the eco-efficiency spectrum.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18046,"journal":{"name":"Management Decision","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Decision","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-12-2023-2425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This is the application of the Entropy and TOPSIS model to assess the eco-efficiency of European financial institutions using environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies. The aim is to categorize financial institutions based on key factors such as environmental training and management and to examine the alignment between ideal ESG performance and eco-efficiency.

Design/methodology/approach

The study uses environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies to identify and categorize eco-entrepreneurs in European financial institutions. The study utilizes data to examine the structure between environmental training, effective management practices, and the green performance of financial institutions.

Findings

The study shows that European financial institutions exhibit varying degrees of eco-efficiency as assessed using the Entropy and TOPSIS model applied to ESG strategies. Surprisingly, the study found that institutions with a high ESG performance do not always match those with the highest eco-efficiency.

Research limitations/implications

They emphasize the need for financial institutions to align their operations with sustainable practices. This research provides insights to increase eco-efficiency and improve the ESG performance of financial institutions. It also informs policy and decision-making in these institutions in relation to environmental training and management practices, contributing to the wider dialogue on sustainable finance.

Originality/value

This indicates a discrepancy between ESG ratings and actual eco-efficiency, emphasizing the need to reassess the ESG framework. The study findings are crucial for aligning financial institutions with sustainable practices and improving the effectiveness of the ESG framework, especially for institutions at the lower end of the eco-efficiency spectrum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲金融机构中由 ESG 驱动的生态企业家选择:熵和 TOPSIS 分析
目的 本文应用熵和 TOPSIS 模型,评估欧洲金融机构采用环境、社会和治理 (ESG) 战略的生态效率。目的是根据环境培训和管理等关键因素对金融机构进行分类,并考察理想的环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效与生态效率之间的一致性。设计/方法/途径本研究利用环境、社会和治理(ESG)战略对欧洲金融机构的生态企业家进行识别和分类。研究结果研究表明,欧洲金融机构在生态效率方面表现出不同程度的差异,这可以通过将 Entropy 和 TOPSIS 模型应用于 ESG 战略来进行评估。令人惊讶的是,研究发现 ESG 表现优异的机构并不总是与生态效率最高的机构相匹配。本研究为金融机构提高生态效率和改善 ESG 表现提供了见解。原创性/价值这项研究表明,环境、社会和治理评级与实际生态效益之间存在差异,强调有必要重新评估环境、社会和治理框架。研究结果对于金融机构与可持续发展实践保持一致以及提高环境、社会和治理框架的有效性至关重要,尤其是对于生态效率较低的机构而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ■In-depth studies of major issues ■Operations management ■Financial management ■Motivation ■Entrepreneurship ■Problem solving and proactivity ■Serious management argument ■Strategy and policy issues ■Tactics for turning around company crises Management Decision, considered by many to be the best publication in its field, consistently offers thoughtful and provocative insights into current management practice. As such, its high calibre contributions from leading management philosophers and practitioners make it an invaluable resource in the aggressive and demanding trading climate of the Twenty-First Century.
期刊最新文献
Compassion, value creation and digital learning orientation in social entrepreneurs The impact of supply chain revamping announcements on shareholder value Prioritizing factors for generative artificial intelligence-based innovation adoption in hospitality industry Exploring the role of heuristics in buyer–supplier relationship dynamics Understanding behavioral strategy: a historical evolutionary perspective in “Management Decision”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1