Association of auditory processing abilities and employment in young women

Yoshita Sharma, Nisha K.V.
{"title":"Association of auditory processing abilities and employment in young women","authors":"Yoshita Sharma, Nisha K.V.","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00611-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the relationship between employment status and auditory processing abilities in women, considering the cognitive impact of work-related demands. The objective was to study the influence of employment on forward -, backward -, operation span, 2n back, and speech perception in noise (SPIN) scores. Fifty-eight women aged 20 to 64 years were categorized into working and non-working groups. Auditory cognitive assessments included forward and backward digit span, auditory 2n-back, operational span, and speech perception in noise. Mental workload, listening effort, and fatigue levels were evaluated for each test using standardized scales. Handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Statistical analysis involved Mann–Whitney tests and effect size calculations. Working women scored significantly higher in 2n-back task compared to non-working counterparts, emphasizing the positive impact of employment on working memory and cognitive control processes. The working women group perceptually rated greater mental load on the operational span task than non-working group, indicating the task-specific manifestation of group differences. When the tasks are easier (2n back) or difficult (operation span), employed women exhibited an advantage in auditory processing over their counterparts. This study reveals nuanced cognitive differences influenced by employment status in women. Working women demonstrated superior auditory processing abilities, specifically in working memory tasks, suggesting potential cognitive benefits associated with engagement in the workforce. The elevated mental workload for dual task working memory paradigms underscores the complexity of simultaneous processing and storage, highlighting cognitive challenges in specific occupational contexts.","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00611-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between employment status and auditory processing abilities in women, considering the cognitive impact of work-related demands. The objective was to study the influence of employment on forward -, backward -, operation span, 2n back, and speech perception in noise (SPIN) scores. Fifty-eight women aged 20 to 64 years were categorized into working and non-working groups. Auditory cognitive assessments included forward and backward digit span, auditory 2n-back, operational span, and speech perception in noise. Mental workload, listening effort, and fatigue levels were evaluated for each test using standardized scales. Handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Statistical analysis involved Mann–Whitney tests and effect size calculations. Working women scored significantly higher in 2n-back task compared to non-working counterparts, emphasizing the positive impact of employment on working memory and cognitive control processes. The working women group perceptually rated greater mental load on the operational span task than non-working group, indicating the task-specific manifestation of group differences. When the tasks are easier (2n back) or difficult (operation span), employed women exhibited an advantage in auditory processing over their counterparts. This study reveals nuanced cognitive differences influenced by employment status in women. Working women demonstrated superior auditory processing abilities, specifically in working memory tasks, suggesting potential cognitive benefits associated with engagement in the workforce. The elevated mental workload for dual task working memory paradigms underscores the complexity of simultaneous processing and storage, highlighting cognitive challenges in specific occupational contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻女性的听觉处理能力与就业的关系
本研究旨在调查就业状况与女性听觉处理能力之间的关系,同时考虑与工作相关的需求对认知的影响。目的是研究就业对前向、后向、操作跨度、2n 回和噪声中的言语感知(SPIN)得分的影响。研究人员将 58 名年龄在 20 至 64 岁之间的女性分为工作组和非工作组。听觉认知评估包括前向和后向数字跨度、听觉 2n-back、操作跨度和噪音中的语音感知。每项测试都使用标准量表对心理工作量、听力强度和疲劳程度进行评估。手的灵活性采用爱丁堡手灵活性量表进行评估。统计分析包括曼-惠特尼测试和效应大小计算。与非职业女性相比,职业女性在 "2n-back "任务中的得分明显更高,这强调了就业对工作记忆和认知控制过程的积极影响。与非职业女性组相比,职业女性组在运算跨度任务中的知觉评定心理负荷更大,这表明了群体差异在特定任务中的表现。当任务比较简单(2n 回溯)或困难(操作跨度)时,职业女性在听觉处理方面比她们的同龄人更有优势。这项研究揭示了受就业状况影响的女性认知差异的细微差别。职业女性的听觉处理能力,特别是在工作记忆任务中表现出了优势,这表明她们的认知能力可能会因参加工作而受益。双任务工作记忆范式的脑力劳动负荷增加突出了同时处理和存储的复杂性,凸显了特定职业环境下的认知挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Betahistine in the treatment of peripheral vertigo: an evidence-based review Age as an important variable that affects auditory and language results after cochlear implant Vocal dysfunction following thyroid surgery: a multidimensional subjective and objective study Dysgeusia and paresthesia following suspension microlaryngoscopy: review and recommendations for risk reduction A study of borderline cases of velopharyngeal insufficiency using cephalometry and nasofibroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1