Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Annals of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1007/s12149-024-01934-4
Deepanksha Datta, B. Selvakumar, Akhil Dhanesh Goel, Sanskriti Chhibber, Vaibhav Kumar Varshney, Rajesh Kumar
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Deepanksha Datta,&nbsp;B. Selvakumar,&nbsp;Akhil Dhanesh Goel,&nbsp;Sanskriti Chhibber,&nbsp;Vaibhav Kumar Varshney,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12149-024-01934-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the non-invasive diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and differentiating it from pancreatic cancer (CaP) based on the amount and pattern of FDG uptake, as well as involvement of extra-pancreatic sites.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Only those studies that compared the findings of F-18 FDG PET/CT in terms of SUVmax, pattern of FDG uptake and presence of FDG-avid extra-pancreatic sites in both AIP and CaP were included. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. The diagnostic performance of parameters on PET/CT was examined through pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd’s ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were included with a total of 580 patients. 178 patients had AIP (Age 18–90 years, male, M: female, F ratio—8.4:1) and 402 patients had CaP (Age 22–88 years, M:F ratio-1.5:1). Type of AIP was reported in only 3 studies, with the included cases predominantly being type 1 AIP. All studies were retrospective with heterogeneity and a risk on patient selection and index test. The FDG uptake, expressed as SUVmax, was lower in AIP with a weighted mean difference of −3.11 (95% confidence interval, CI: −5.28 to −0.94). To diagnose AIP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of diffuse pattern of FDG uptake were 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51–0.66), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92) and 21.07 (95% CI: 5.07–88.32), respectively, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.717 on SROC analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of FDG-avid extra pancreatic sites were 0.55 (95% CI: 0.45–0.65), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52–0.64) and 2.33 (95% CI: 1.40–3.89), respectively, with an AUC of 0.632.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>On F-18 FDG PET/CT, a pancreatic lesion of AIP has a lower SUVmax value than CaP. A diffuse pattern of FDG uptake and presence of an extra-pancreatic FDG-avid site are nearly 21 times and twice more likely in AIP than CaP, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-024-01934-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the non-invasive diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and differentiating it from pancreatic cancer (CaP) based on the amount and pattern of FDG uptake, as well as involvement of extra-pancreatic sites.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Only those studies that compared the findings of F-18 FDG PET/CT in terms of SUVmax, pattern of FDG uptake and presence of FDG-avid extra-pancreatic sites in both AIP and CaP were included. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. The diagnostic performance of parameters on PET/CT was examined through pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd’s ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis.

Results

Six studies were included with a total of 580 patients. 178 patients had AIP (Age 18–90 years, male, M: female, F ratio—8.4:1) and 402 patients had CaP (Age 22–88 years, M:F ratio-1.5:1). Type of AIP was reported in only 3 studies, with the included cases predominantly being type 1 AIP. All studies were retrospective with heterogeneity and a risk on patient selection and index test. The FDG uptake, expressed as SUVmax, was lower in AIP with a weighted mean difference of −3.11 (95% confidence interval, CI: −5.28 to −0.94). To diagnose AIP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of diffuse pattern of FDG uptake were 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51–0.66), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92) and 21.07 (95% CI: 5.07–88.32), respectively, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.717 on SROC analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of FDG-avid extra pancreatic sites were 0.55 (95% CI: 0.45–0.65), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52–0.64) and 2.33 (95% CI: 1.40–3.89), respectively, with an AUC of 0.632.

Conclusion

On F-18 FDG PET/CT, a pancreatic lesion of AIP has a lower SUVmax value than CaP. A diffuse pattern of FDG uptake and presence of an extra-pancreatic FDG-avid site are nearly 21 times and twice more likely in AIP than CaP, respectively.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
F-18 FDG PET/CT 在区分自身免疫性胰腺炎和胰腺癌方面的诊断性能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的本研究旨在评估 F-18 FDG PET/CT 在无创诊断自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)中的应用,并根据 FDG 摄取的数量和模式以及胰腺外部位的受累情况将其与胰腺癌(CaP)区分开来:方法:使用 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索。只有那些比较了 F-18 FDG PET/CT 对 AIP 和 CaP 的 SUVmax、FDG 摄取模式和 FDG 亲和胰腺外部位的发现的研究才被纳入。对研究的偏倚风险和发表偏倚进行了定性评估。通过汇总灵敏度、特异性、诊断奇异比(DOR)和接受者操作特征曲线(SROC)分析,对 PET/CT 参数的诊断性能进行了研究:结果:共纳入六项研究,患者总数为 580 人。178名患者患有AIP(年龄18-90岁,男性,男:女,女:男的比例为8.4:1),402名患者患有CaP(年龄22-88岁,男:女的比例为1.5:1)。只有 3 项研究报告了 AIP 的类型,纳入的病例主要为 1 型 AIP。所有研究均为回顾性研究,存在异质性,在患者选择和指标检测方面存在风险。以SUVmax表示的FDG摄取量在AIP中较低,加权平均差为-3.11(95%置信区间,CI:-5.28至-0.94)。在 SROC 分析中,诊断 AIP 的 FDG 摄取弥漫模式的集合敏感性、特异性和 DOR 分别为 0.59(95% CI:0.51-0.66)、0.89(95% CI:0.86-0.92)和 21.07(95% CI:5.07-88.32),曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.717。FDG显像胰腺外部位的集合敏感性、特异性和DOR分别为0.55(95% CI:0.45-0.65)、0.58(95% CI:0.52-0.64)和2.33(95% CI:1.40-3.89),AUC为0.632:在F-18 FDG PET/CT上,AIP胰腺病变的SUVmax值低于CaP。AIP 中 FDG 摄取的弥漫模式和存在胰腺外 FDG-avid 位点的可能性分别是 CaP 的近 21 倍和两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Research trends and hotspots of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer treatment in the twenty-first century: a bibliometric analysis. Long-term effect of postoperative radioactive iodine therapy on parathyroid function in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Assessment of post-pyeloplasty renal drainage in antenatally detected hydronephrosis by 99mTc-L, L-Ethylenedicysteine renal scintigraphy: the importance of delayed imaging. The 1st World Congress of Nuclear Medicine and Biology held in Japan: a historical review with personal reminiscences. Head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of various tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1