Farm animal exposure setting impacts hemolytic uremic syndrome risk among Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli cases: Minnesota, 2010-2019.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Epidemiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1017/S0950268824000773
Madhura S Vachon, Joshua Rounds, Kirk Smith, Carlota Medus, Craig W Hedberg, Carrie Klumb, Gillian A M Tarr
{"title":"Farm animal exposure setting impacts hemolytic uremic syndrome risk among Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> cases: Minnesota, 2010-2019.","authors":"Madhura S Vachon, Joshua Rounds, Kirk Smith, Carlota Medus, Craig W Hedberg, Carrie Klumb, Gillian A M Tarr","doi":"10.1017/S0950268824000773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) transmission occurs in ruminant contact settings and can lead to post-diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). We investigated whether exposure setting (ruminant exposure from living or working on a farm, visiting a farm or animal contact venue, or both) influenced HUS development among individuals with laboratory-confirmed STEC infections using Minnesota surveillance data from 2010 to 2019. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether exposure setting was associated with HUS independent of age, gender, <i>stx2</i> gene detection, and county ruminants per capita. Among confirmed STEC cases, ruminant exposure only from living or working on a farm was not significantly associated with HUS compared to cases without any ruminant exposure (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.51, 3.04). However, ruminant exposure only from visiting a farm or public animal contact venue was associated with HUS (OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.50, 4.24). Exposure from both settings was also associated with HUS (OR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.39, 9.90). Exposure to ruminants when visiting farms or animal contact venues is an important predictor of HUS, even among people who live or work on farms with ruminants. All people, regardless of routine ruminant exposure, should take care in settings with ruminants to avoid infection with STEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11721,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268824000773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) transmission occurs in ruminant contact settings and can lead to post-diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). We investigated whether exposure setting (ruminant exposure from living or working on a farm, visiting a farm or animal contact venue, or both) influenced HUS development among individuals with laboratory-confirmed STEC infections using Minnesota surveillance data from 2010 to 2019. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether exposure setting was associated with HUS independent of age, gender, stx2 gene detection, and county ruminants per capita. Among confirmed STEC cases, ruminant exposure only from living or working on a farm was not significantly associated with HUS compared to cases without any ruminant exposure (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.51, 3.04). However, ruminant exposure only from visiting a farm or public animal contact venue was associated with HUS (OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.50, 4.24). Exposure from both settings was also associated with HUS (OR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.39, 9.90). Exposure to ruminants when visiting farms or animal contact venues is an important predictor of HUS, even among people who live or work on farms with ruminants. All people, regardless of routine ruminant exposure, should take care in settings with ruminants to avoid infection with STEC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农场动物暴露环境对感染产志贺毒素大肠杆菌病例中溶血性尿毒症风险的影响--明尼苏达州,2010-2019年。
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的传播发生在反刍动物接触环境中,可导致腹泻后溶血性尿毒症(HUS)。我们利用明尼苏达州 2010 年至 2019 年的监测数据,调查了接触环境(在农场生活或工作时接触反刍动物、参观农场或动物接触场所或两者兼而有之)是否会影响实验室确诊 STEC 感染者的 HUS 发病。我们进行了逻辑回归,以确定暴露环境是否与 HUS 无关,而与年龄、性别、stx2 基因检测和县人均反刍动物数量无关。在确诊的 STEC 病例中,与未接触反刍动物的病例相比,仅在农场生活或工作时接触反刍动物与 HUS 并无显著相关性(OR:1.25;95% CI:0.51,3.04)。然而,仅在农场或公共动物接触场所接触反刍动物则与 HUS 相关(OR:2.53;95% CI:1.50-4.24)。在这两种情况下接触反刍动物也与 HUS 相关(OR:3.71;95% CI:1.39,9.90)。即使是在有反刍动物的农场生活或工作的人,在参观农场或动物接触场所时接触反刍动物也是预测 HUS 的一个重要因素。所有人,无论是否经常接触反刍动物,在有反刍动物的环境中都应注意避免感染 STEC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Infection
Epidemiology and Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
366
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology & Infection publishes original reports and reviews on all aspects of infection in humans and animals. Particular emphasis is given to the epidemiology, prevention and control of infectious diseases. The scope covers the zoonoses, outbreaks, food hygiene, vaccine studies, statistics and the clinical, social and public-health aspects of infectious disease, as well as some tropical infections. It has become the key international periodical in which to find the latest reports on recently discovered infections and new technology. For those concerned with policy and planning for the control of infections, the papers on mathematical modelling of epidemics caused by historical, current and emergent infections are of particular value.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of ambient temperature and precipitation with infections from five food-borne bacterial pathogens. High Campylobacter diversity in retail chicken: epidemiologically important strains may be missed with current sampling methods. Prevalence and persistence of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in Swedish university students - CORRIGENDUM. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence from repeated pooled testing: application to Swiss routine data. Risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections during COVID-19 pandemic in intensive care patients in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1