Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in Patients With Obesity and Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Texas Heart Institute Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.14503/THIJ-23-8260
Zoe H Tu, Alejandro D Perez, Thomas E Diaz, Matthew S Loop, Megan Clarke
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in Patients With Obesity and Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Zoe H Tu, Alejandro D Perez, Thomas E Diaz, Matthew S Loop, Megan Clarke","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-23-8260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current venous thromboembolism guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin regardless of obesity status; however, evidence remains limited for the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in patients with obesity. This retrospective analysis sought to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared with warfarin in a diverse population of patients with obesity in light of current prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large academic health system between July 2014 and September 2019. Adults with an admission diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism, with weight greater than 120 kg or a body mass index greater than 40, and who were discharged on an oral anticoagulant were included. Outcomes included occurrence of a thromboembolic event (DVT, pulmonary embolism, or ischemic stroke), bleeding event requiring hospitalization, and all-cause mortality within 12 months following index admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 787 patients included, 520 were in the DOAC group and 267 were in the warfarin group. Within 12 months of index hospitalization, thromboembolic events occurred in 4.23% of patients in the DOAC group vs 7.12% of patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.32-1.1]; P = .082). Bleeding events requiring hospitalization occurred in 8.85% of DOAC patients vs 10.1% of warfarin patients (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.57-1.5]; P = .82). A DVT occurred in 1.7% and 4.9% of patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.84]; P = .046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences could be determined between DOACs and warfarin for cumulative thromboembolic or bleeding events, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, or all-cause mortality. The risk of DVT was lower with apixaban and rivaroxaban. Regardless of patient weight or body mass index, physicians prescribed DOACs more commonly than warfarin.</p>","PeriodicalId":48680,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-23-8260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current venous thromboembolism guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin regardless of obesity status; however, evidence remains limited for the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in patients with obesity. This retrospective analysis sought to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared with warfarin in a diverse population of patients with obesity in light of current prescribing practices.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large academic health system between July 2014 and September 2019. Adults with an admission diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism, with weight greater than 120 kg or a body mass index greater than 40, and who were discharged on an oral anticoagulant were included. Outcomes included occurrence of a thromboembolic event (DVT, pulmonary embolism, or ischemic stroke), bleeding event requiring hospitalization, and all-cause mortality within 12 months following index admission.

Results: Out of 787 patients included, 520 were in the DOAC group and 267 were in the warfarin group. Within 12 months of index hospitalization, thromboembolic events occurred in 4.23% of patients in the DOAC group vs 7.12% of patients in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.32-1.1]; P = .082). Bleeding events requiring hospitalization occurred in 8.85% of DOAC patients vs 10.1% of warfarin patients (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.57-1.5]; P = .82). A DVT occurred in 1.7% and 4.9% of patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.84]; P = .046).

Conclusion: No significant differences could be determined between DOACs and warfarin for cumulative thromboembolic or bleeding events, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, or all-cause mortality. The risk of DVT was lower with apixaban and rivaroxaban. Regardless of patient weight or body mass index, physicians prescribed DOACs more commonly than warfarin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖和静脉血栓栓塞患者服用直接口服抗凝药与华法林的安全性和有效性对比:回顾性分析
背景:目前的静脉血栓栓塞指南建议使用直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)而非华法林,无论肥胖与否;然而,肥胖患者使用直接口服抗凝药的安全性和有效性证据仍然有限。这项回顾性分析旨在根据目前的处方惯例,在不同的肥胖患者群体中证明 DOAC 与华法林相比的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究于 2014 年 7 月至 2019 年 9 月在一家大型学术医疗系统进行。研究纳入了入院诊断为深静脉血栓(DVT)或肺栓塞、体重大于 120 千克或体重指数大于 40、出院时服用口服抗凝药的成人。结果包括入院后12个月内发生血栓栓塞事件(深静脉血栓、肺栓塞或缺血性中风)、需要住院治疗的出血事件以及全因死亡率:在纳入的 787 例患者中,520 例为 DOAC 组,267 例为华法林组。在入院后 12 个月内,DOAC 组有 4.23% 的患者发生血栓栓塞事件,而华法林组有 7.12% 的患者发生血栓栓塞事件(危险比为 0.6 [95% CI, 0.32-1.1];P = 0.082)。8.85%的DOAC患者与10.1%的华法林患者发生了需要住院治疗的出血事件(危险比为0.93 [95% CI, 0.57-1.5];P = .82)。DOAC组和华法林组分别有1.7%和4.9%的患者发生深静脉血栓(危险比为0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.84];P = .046):结论:在累积血栓栓塞或出血事件、肺栓塞、缺血性卒中或全因死亡率方面,DOAC 和华法林之间没有明显差异。阿哌沙班和利伐沙班发生深静脉血栓的风险较低。无论患者的体重或体重指数如何,医生开出的 DOAC 比华法林更常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Texas Heart Institute Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Surgical Repair of Postinfarction Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm. Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Women: Insights From the Houston HeartReach Study. Recent Developments in Cardiac Contractility Modulation for Heart Failure. Valvular Endocarditis and Biventricular Heart Failure in the Setting of Tropheryma whipplei Disease. Cardiac Mass in a 78-Year-Old Patient With a History of Cancer: Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1