Basic science knowledge underlies clinical science knowledge and clinical problem solving: evidence from veterinary medicine.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2
Jared A Danielson, Rebecca G Burzette, Misty R Bailey, Linda M Berent, Heather Case, Anita Casey-Reed, John Dascanio, Richard A Feinberg, Tamara S Hancock, Claudia A Kirk
{"title":"Basic science knowledge underlies clinical science knowledge and clinical problem solving: evidence from veterinary medicine.","authors":"Jared A Danielson, Rebecca G Burzette, Misty R Bailey, Linda M Berent, Heather Case, Anita Casey-Reed, John Dascanio, Richard A Feinberg, Tamara S Hancock, Claudia A Kirk","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical sciences education emphasizes basic science learning as a prerequisite to clinical learning. Studies exploring relationships between achievement in the basic sciences and subsequent achievement in the clinical sciences generally suggest a significant positive relationship. Basic science knowledge and clinical experience are theorized to combine to form encapsulated knowledge- a dynamic mix of information that is useful for solving clinical problems. This study explores the relationship between basic science knowledge (BSK), clinical science knowledge (CSK), and clinical problem-solving ability, as measured within the context of four veterinary colleges using both college-specific measures and professionally validated, standardized measures of basic and clinical science knowledge and problem-solving ability. Significant correlations existed among all variables. Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis were used to produce models showing that newly acquired BSK directly and significantly predicted BSK retained over time and newly acquired CSK, as well as indirectly predicted clinical problem-solving ability (mediated by newly acquired CSK and BSK retained over time). These findings likely suggest a gradual development of schema (encapsulated knowledge) and not an isolated development of biomedical versus clinical knowledge over time. A broader implication of these results is that explicitly teaching basic science knowledge positively and durably affects subsequent clinical knowledge and problem-solving ability independent of instructional strategy or curricular approach. Furthermore, for veterinary colleges specifically, student performance as measured by both course-level and standardized tests are likely to prove useful for predicting subsequent academic achievement in classroom and clinical settings, licensing examination performance, and/or for identifying students likely in need of remediation in clinical knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10334-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical sciences education emphasizes basic science learning as a prerequisite to clinical learning. Studies exploring relationships between achievement in the basic sciences and subsequent achievement in the clinical sciences generally suggest a significant positive relationship. Basic science knowledge and clinical experience are theorized to combine to form encapsulated knowledge- a dynamic mix of information that is useful for solving clinical problems. This study explores the relationship between basic science knowledge (BSK), clinical science knowledge (CSK), and clinical problem-solving ability, as measured within the context of four veterinary colleges using both college-specific measures and professionally validated, standardized measures of basic and clinical science knowledge and problem-solving ability. Significant correlations existed among all variables. Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis were used to produce models showing that newly acquired BSK directly and significantly predicted BSK retained over time and newly acquired CSK, as well as indirectly predicted clinical problem-solving ability (mediated by newly acquired CSK and BSK retained over time). These findings likely suggest a gradual development of schema (encapsulated knowledge) and not an isolated development of biomedical versus clinical knowledge over time. A broader implication of these results is that explicitly teaching basic science knowledge positively and durably affects subsequent clinical knowledge and problem-solving ability independent of instructional strategy or curricular approach. Furthermore, for veterinary colleges specifically, student performance as measured by both course-level and standardized tests are likely to prove useful for predicting subsequent academic achievement in classroom and clinical settings, licensing examination performance, and/or for identifying students likely in need of remediation in clinical knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础科学知识是临床科学知识和临床问题解决的基础:来自兽医学的证据。
医学教育强调基础科学学习是临床学习的前提。探讨基础科学成绩与后续临床科学成绩之间关系的研究普遍表明,两者之间存在显著的正相关关系。理论上,基础科学知识与临床经验相结合,形成了封装知识--一种有助于解决临床问题的动态信息组合。本研究探讨了基础科学知识(BSK)、临床科学知识(CSK)和临床问题解决能力之间的关系,在四所兽医学院的背景下,使用学院特定的测量方法和经过专业验证的基础与临床科学知识和问题解决能力的标准化测量方法进行测量。所有变量之间都存在明显的相关性。通过结构方程建模和确认性因子分析建立的模型显示,新获得的 BSK 可以直接并显著地预测随着时间推移而保留的 BSK 和新获得的 CSK,还可以间接地预测临床问题解决能力(通过新获得的 CSK 和随着时间推移而保留的 BSK 进行中介)。这些发现可能表明,随着时间的推移,图式(封装知识)会逐渐发展,而不是生物医学知识相对于临床知识的孤立发展。这些结果的一个更广泛的含义是,明确教授基础科学知识会对后续临床知识和解决问题的能力产生积极而持久的影响,而与教学策略或课程方法无关。此外,具体到兽医学院,通过课程水平测试和标准化测试衡量的学生成绩很可能被证明有助于预测学生在课堂和临床环境中的后续学业成绩、执业资格考试成绩,以及/或识别可能需要补习临床知识的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
期刊最新文献
Social support and academic procrastination in health professions students: the serial mediating effect of intrinsic learning motivation and academic self-efficacy. To define or not to define: a commentary on 'The case for metacognitive reflection'. Team science in interdisciplinary health professions education research: a multi-institutional case study. Belonging in dual roles: exploring professional identity formation among disabled healthcare students and clinicians. Understanding simulation-based learning for health professions students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1