The impact of climate policy on oil and gas investment: Evidence from firm-level data

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Economic Review Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104750
Christian Bogmans, Andrea Pescatori, Ervin Prifti
{"title":"The impact of climate policy on oil and gas investment: Evidence from firm-level data","authors":"Christian Bogmans,&nbsp;Andrea Pescatori,&nbsp;Ervin Prifti","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using a text-based firm-level measure of climate policy exposure, we show that climate policies have led to a global decline of 6.5 percent in investment among publicly traded oil and gas companies between 2015 and 2019, with European companies experiencing the most significant impact. Similarly, climate policy uncertainty has also had a negative impact. Our empirical results support the Neoclassical investment model. According to this model, firms pre-emptively cut investment in response to downward shifts in future demand. These findings contrast with the Green Paradox theory, which predicts an increase in current investment by oil and gas firms aimed at shifting extraction toward the present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124000795","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a text-based firm-level measure of climate policy exposure, we show that climate policies have led to a global decline of 6.5 percent in investment among publicly traded oil and gas companies between 2015 and 2019, with European companies experiencing the most significant impact. Similarly, climate policy uncertainty has also had a negative impact. Our empirical results support the Neoclassical investment model. According to this model, firms pre-emptively cut investment in response to downward shifts in future demand. These findings contrast with the Green Paradox theory, which predicts an increase in current investment by oil and gas firms aimed at shifting extraction toward the present.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候政策对石油和天然气投资的影响:来自公司层面数据的证据
利用基于文本的公司层面气候政策风险度量,我们发现气候政策导致全球石油和天然气上市公司在 2015 年至 2019 年间的投资下降了 6.5%,其中欧洲公司受到的影响最为显著。同样,气候政策的不确定性也产生了负面影响。我们的实证结果支持新古典投资模型。根据这一模型,企业会先发制人地削减投资,以应对未来需求的下移。这些研究结果与绿色悖论理论形成了鲜明对比,后者预测石油和天然气公司会增加当前投资,以便将开采转向当前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Regional variations in corporate tax responsiveness: Evidence from Switzerland Editorial Board Effects of extending paid parental leave on children’s socio-emotional skills and well-being in adolescence Identifying and quantifying the extraterritorial effects of sanctions Targeted monetary policy, dual rates, and bank risk-taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1