This paper investigates the macroeconomic and distributional impact of quasi-fiscal (QF) policies implemented by the Federal Reserve during the Covid-19 crisis. Using high-frequency, county-level data on consumption and employment, we distinguish between purely monetary measures — such as interest rate cuts and asset purchases — and quasi-fiscal tools like credit facilities and liquidity programs. We show that QF interventions generated faster and stronger effects on both consumption and employment compared to conventional tools, with responses materializing within two to three weeks of announcements. Moreover, we find that these effects were not evenly distributed across US counties: consumption inequality increased in the short term, with wealthier counties experiencing larger gains. We explore the underlying mechanisms and show that both asset-price-related wealth effects and credit availability through lending facilities played key roles, especially in regions with higher capital income and greater access to loans. Our findings suggest that while QF policies can act as effective stabilizers during crises, they may also exacerbate spatial inequalities in the short run, raising new questions for central bank accountability and policy design.
{"title":"Quasi-fiscal policies in times of crisis: A high-frequency data analysis","authors":"Luisa Corrado , Daniela Fantozzi , Simona Giglioli","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105265","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105265","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the macroeconomic and distributional impact of quasi-fiscal (QF) policies implemented by the Federal Reserve during the Covid-19 crisis. Using high-frequency, county-level data on consumption and employment, we distinguish between purely monetary measures — such as interest rate cuts and asset purchases — and quasi-fiscal tools like credit facilities and liquidity programs. We show that QF interventions generated faster and stronger effects on both consumption and employment compared to conventional tools, with responses materializing within two to three weeks of announcements. Moreover, we find that these effects were not evenly distributed across US counties: consumption inequality increased in the short term, with wealthier counties experiencing larger gains. We explore the underlying mechanisms and show that both asset-price-related wealth effects and credit availability through lending facilities played key roles, especially in regions with higher capital income and greater access to loans. Our findings suggest that while QF policies can act as effective stabilizers during crises, they may also exacerbate spatial inequalities in the short run, raising new questions for central bank accountability and policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105269
James Konow , Leonie Kühl , Nora Szech
Arguments for directing charitable giving to distant beneficiaries for their greater benefits contradict actual charitable donations that go mostly to more proximate beneficiaries. Controlled studies reveal mixed results finding the giving-distance relationship to be direct, inverse, flat, or various combinations of the three. This paper reports a new theory of the distinctive relationship between giving and spatial distance and relevant results from four experimental studies. Two studies vary distances between donors and beneficiaries locally: a field experiment involves local refugees and a laboratory experiment local people in need. Both find significant inverse relationships between giving and spatial distance. Two other studies involve variations at farther distances. One is a laboratory experiment that finds no significant effect of distance, but further analysis suggests that a confounding factor, viz., beneficiary need, contributes to that fact. The other is survey experiment that indicates numerous additional confounding factors in comparisons involving far distances. The experimental results are largely consistent with the predictions of the theory: giving is decreasing in spatial distance, ceteris paribus, and is decreasing in exposure to displaced persons, decreasing in support for beneficiaries from sources external to the experiment (e.g., government aid), increasing in donor intrinsic generosity, and increasing in beneficiary need. We also find qualified support for the hypothesized mediator between spatial distance and giving, moral salience. Together, these results confirm our focus on local distances, indicate the presence of confounding factors over far distances, and offer an explanation to reconcile the conflicting results in the prior literature.
{"title":"The kindness of strangers: Theory and evidence on spatial distance and giving","authors":"James Konow , Leonie Kühl , Nora Szech","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105269","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105269","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arguments for directing charitable giving to distant beneficiaries for their greater benefits contradict actual charitable donations that go mostly to more proximate beneficiaries. Controlled studies reveal mixed results finding the giving-distance relationship to be direct, inverse, flat, or various combinations of the three. This paper reports a new theory of the distinctive relationship between giving and spatial distance and relevant results from four experimental studies. Two studies vary distances between donors and beneficiaries locally: a field experiment involves local refugees and a laboratory experiment local people in need. Both find significant inverse relationships between giving and spatial distance. Two other studies involve variations at farther distances. One is a laboratory experiment that finds no significant effect of distance, but further analysis suggests that a confounding factor, viz., beneficiary need, contributes to that fact. The other is survey experiment that indicates numerous additional confounding factors in comparisons involving far distances. The experimental results are largely consistent with the predictions of the theory: giving is decreasing in spatial distance, ceteris paribus, and is decreasing in exposure to displaced persons, decreasing in support for beneficiaries from sources external to the experiment (e.g., government aid), increasing in donor intrinsic generosity, and increasing in beneficiary need. We also find qualified support for the hypothesized mediator between spatial distance and giving, moral salience. Together, these results confirm our focus on local distances, indicate the presence of confounding factors over far distances, and offer an explanation to reconcile the conflicting results in the prior literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105264
Chiara Tomasi , Quoc Thai Le
This paper investigates how corruption influences the gains from trade liberalization. Using firm-level data from Vietnam from 2000 to 2012, which includes the country’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the analysis provides robust causal evidence, based on fixed effects and instrumental variable estimation techniques, that corruption mitigates the positive impact of tariff reduction on firm productivity. One key mechanism through which corruption may limit productivity is by reducing importing. The paper shows that the likelihood of importing following input tariff cuts is lower for firms in provinces with higher corruption. We examine the broader implications of our firm-level findings and show that, in a counterfactual scenario without corruption, Vietnam’s productivity gains from trade liberalization would have been higher.
{"title":"Corruption, trade liberalization and firm productivity: Evidence from Vietnam","authors":"Chiara Tomasi , Quoc Thai Le","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105264","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105264","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how corruption influences the gains from trade liberalization. Using firm-level data from Vietnam from 2000 to 2012, which includes the country’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the analysis provides robust causal evidence, based on fixed effects and instrumental variable estimation techniques, that corruption mitigates the positive impact of tariff reduction on firm productivity. One key mechanism through which corruption may limit productivity is by reducing importing. The paper shows that the likelihood of importing following input tariff cuts is lower for firms in provinces with higher corruption. We examine the broader implications of our firm-level findings and show that, in a counterfactual scenario without corruption, Vietnam’s productivity gains from trade liberalization would have been higher.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105239
Guohao Yang
This paper studies the impact of transportation costs on a country’s participation in Global Value Chains (GVCs) and the consequential role of the processing producers. In doing so, I incorporate the processing production into a sequential production model à la Antrás and de Gortari (2020) with a multivariate Frechet distribution. My model predicts that a reduction in foreign trade costs increases the specialization of a region in exporting downstream products, and processing exports are more responsive to foreign trade costs than ordinary exports. These two predictions are consistent with the empirical facts documented by the development of the Chinese Expressway between 2000 and 2010, which serves as a natural experiment. In my welfare analysis, my model shows that a reduction in foreign transportation costs leads to a 0.4% of aggregate welfare gain, and processing exporters can explain up to 80% of this welfare gain. However, removing expressways and processing policies together results in a welfare loss of 4.82%, lower than the loss of removing expressways alone, which is 17.3%. This suggests that the implementation of the processing trade policy is not always beneficial when considering the placement of transportation infrastructure. This is because transportation infrastructure changes the relative importance of domestic and foreign markets.
本文研究了运输成本对一国参与全球价值链的影响以及加工生产商的相应作用。在此过程中,我将加工生产纳入具有多元Frechet分布的顺序生产模型 la Antrás和de Gortari(2020)。我的模型预测,对外贸易成本的降低提高了一个地区出口下游产品的专业化程度,加工出口比普通出口对外贸成本的反应更灵敏。这两种预测与2000 - 2010年中国高速公路发展的经验事实相一致,具有自然实验的作用。在我的福利分析中,我的模型显示,国外运输成本的降低导致了总福利收益的0.4%,而加工出口商可以解释这一福利收益的80%。但是,取消高速公路和处理政策的福利损失为4.82%,低于单独取消高速公路的损失(17.3%)。这表明,在考虑运输基础设施的安置时,加工贸易政策的实施并不总是有益的。这是因为交通基础设施改变了国内和国外市场的相对重要性。
{"title":"Infrastructure and global value chain position: Evidence from China","authors":"Guohao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105239","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies the impact of transportation costs on a country’s participation in Global Value Chains (GVCs) and the consequential role of the processing producers. In doing so, I incorporate the processing production into a sequential production model <em>à la</em> Antrás and de Gortari (2020) with a multivariate Frechet distribution. My model predicts that a reduction in foreign trade costs increases the specialization of a region in exporting downstream products, and processing exports are more responsive to foreign trade costs than ordinary exports. These two predictions are consistent with the empirical facts documented by the development of the Chinese Expressway between 2000 and 2010, which serves as a natural experiment. In my welfare analysis, my model shows that a reduction in foreign transportation costs leads to a 0.4% of aggregate welfare gain, and processing exporters can explain up to 80% of this welfare gain. However, removing expressways and processing policies together results in a welfare loss of 4.82%, lower than the loss of removing expressways alone, which is 17.3%. This suggests that the implementation of the processing trade policy is not always beneficial when considering the placement of transportation infrastructure. This is because transportation infrastructure changes the relative importance of domestic and foreign markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-18DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105263
Carmine Ornaghi , Lorenzo Cassi
This paper examines the relationship between the post-merger decline in patenting among pharmaceutical firms, as observed in previous firm-level studies, and the following individual-level dynamics: (i) the exit of inventors from the innovation market, (ii) the departure of inventors from target firms to other research labs, and (iii) a decline in the innovative output of inventors who remain within the acquired firms. Using a large sample of target companies, we estimate that acquisitions are associated with an increase in exit rates of inventors between 7.6 and 17.5 percentage points and of their departure rates ranging from 12.2 to18.9 percentage points. We find similar results are obtained for large and small deals and that top inventors of targets are also more likely to exit or to leave when an acquisition takes place. Our results show that, for each inventor that exits the innovation market, around 2 patents are foregone, representing more than 30 percent loss of the expected output these scientists could have produced over their careers. Inventors who relocate to a different lab also generate 2 fewer patents compared to similar control scientists, representing a 30 percent decrease in their productivity too. Finally, inventors that stay at the acquired targets also experience a decrease in output of nearly one fewer patent. These results point to a significant decline in both human capital and consumer welfare, which call for a closer scrutiny of M&As.
{"title":"Acquisitions, inventors’ turnover, and innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry","authors":"Carmine Ornaghi , Lorenzo Cassi","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105263","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105263","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the relationship between the post-merger decline in patenting among pharmaceutical firms, as observed in previous firm-level studies, and the following individual-level dynamics: (i) the exit of inventors from the innovation market, (ii) the departure of inventors from target firms to other research labs, and (iii) a decline in the innovative output of inventors who remain within the acquired firms. Using a large sample of target companies, we estimate that acquisitions are associated with an increase in exit rates of inventors between 7.6 and 17.5 percentage points and of their departure rates ranging from 12.2 to18.9 percentage points. We find similar results are obtained for large and small deals and that top inventors of targets are also more likely to exit or to leave when an acquisition takes place. Our results show that, for each inventor that exits the innovation market, around 2 patents are foregone, representing more than 30 percent loss of the expected output these scientists could have produced over their careers. Inventors who relocate to a different lab also generate 2 fewer patents compared to similar control scientists, representing a 30 percent decrease in their productivity too. Finally, inventors that stay at the acquired targets also experience a decrease in output of nearly one fewer patent. These results point to a significant decline in both human capital and consumer welfare, which call for a closer scrutiny of M&As.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-10DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105261
Mara Barschkett
In recent decades, the share of very young children in daycare has significantly increased in many OECD countries, including Germany. Despite the critical role of child health in development and later life success, the impact of early daycare attendance on health has received little attention in the economic literature. This study examines the effects of a substantial daycare expansion in Germany on children’s dynamic mental and physical health outcomes by age. Drawing on a unique set of administrative health records covering 90% of the German population over a ten-year period, I exploit exogenous variation in daycare attendance induced by this expansion. My findings indicate a substitution of illness spells from elementary school to the early years of daycare. Specifically, early daycare attendance is associated with a 5–6 percent increase in the prevalence of respiratory and infectious diseases, as well as healthcare consumption among children aged 1–2 years. Conversely, by elementary school age (6–10 years), the prevalence of these conditions decreases by a similar magnitude. However, I find no evidence of daycare attendance affecting mental disorders, obesity, injuries, vision problems, or healthcare costs. Additional analyses reveal earlier detection of vision problems and a reduction in obesity among children from disadvantaged backgrounds, as well as beneficial spillover effects on parents.
{"title":"The early bird gets the germs? The impact of early daycare attendance on children’s health","authors":"Mara Barschkett","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, the share of very young children in daycare has significantly increased in many OECD countries, including Germany. Despite the critical role of child health in development and later life success, the impact of early daycare attendance on health has received little attention in the economic literature. This study examines the effects of a substantial daycare expansion in Germany on children’s dynamic mental and physical health outcomes by age. Drawing on a unique set of administrative health records covering 90% of the German population over a ten-year period, I exploit exogenous variation in daycare attendance induced by this expansion. My findings indicate a substitution of illness spells from elementary school to the early years of daycare. Specifically, early daycare attendance is associated with a 5–6 percent increase in the prevalence of respiratory and infectious diseases, as well as healthcare consumption among children aged 1–2 years. Conversely, by elementary school age (6–10 years), the prevalence of these conditions decreases by a similar magnitude. However, I find no evidence of daycare attendance affecting mental disorders, obesity, injuries, vision problems, or healthcare costs. Additional analyses reveal earlier detection of vision problems and a reduction in obesity among children from disadvantaged backgrounds, as well as beneficial spillover effects on parents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105255
Nicola Hüholt, Nora Szech
Research suggests that individuals are generally skeptical about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in moral contexts, favoring human decision-makers over AI. Yet, in two experiments involving a total of 5639 participants, we find that individuals facing a real-life moral decision delegate significantly more often when they can delegate to AI rather than to a human counterpart. This result highlights AI’s relative appeal as a moral delegate, indicating that individuals’ preferences for AI’s involvement change when they themselves assume the role of a decision-maker. Responsibility shifting, previously studied as a motive for delegation to humans, extends to AI delegates. Moreover, it appears to be facilitated by individuals adapting their beliefs about AI’s capability in a self-serving manner. Ambiguity surrounding that capability allows them to interpret it in ways that justify delegation. These findings add nuance to assumptions about algorithm aversion in moral domains and raise critical questions about accountability and the ethical implications of relying on AI for morally sensitive decisions.
{"title":"Trusting machines with morality — Delegating moral decisions to AI","authors":"Nicola Hüholt, Nora Szech","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research suggests that individuals are generally skeptical about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in moral contexts, favoring human decision-makers over AI. Yet, in two experiments involving a total of 5639 participants, we find that individuals facing a real-life moral decision delegate significantly more often when they can delegate to AI rather than to a human counterpart. This result highlights AI’s relative appeal as a moral delegate, indicating that individuals’ preferences for AI’s involvement change when they themselves assume the role of a decision-maker. Responsibility shifting, previously studied as a motive for delegation to humans, extends to AI delegates. Moreover, it appears to be facilitated by individuals adapting their beliefs about AI’s capability in a self-serving manner. Ambiguity surrounding that capability allows them to interpret it in ways that justify delegation. These findings add nuance to assumptions about algorithm aversion in moral domains and raise critical questions about accountability and the ethical implications of relying on AI for morally sensitive decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105244
Jana Schuetz
I conduct an online survey of 3000 respondents in the United States to examine individuals’ beliefs about the gender pension gap. By including an information provision experiment in which treated respondents are informed about the size of the gender pension gap, I examine whether receiving this information causally affects respondents’ perceptions of the fairness and drivers of the gender pension gap and their support for policies aimed at reducing it. I find that most respondents underestimate the gender pension gap and that treated respondents are less likely to perceive the gender pension gap as fair. In addition, treated respondents perceive the unequal distribution of care work and gender differences in wages as more important drivers of the gap, and their demand for remedial policies such as targeted financial education increases significantly. This increase in policy demand is driven by male respondents and Republicans.
{"title":"Beliefs about the gender pension gap","authors":"Jana Schuetz","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105244","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105244","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I conduct an online survey of 3000 respondents in the United States to examine individuals’ beliefs about the gender pension gap. By including an information provision experiment in which treated respondents are informed about the size of the gender pension gap, I examine whether receiving this information causally affects respondents’ perceptions of the fairness and drivers of the gender pension gap and their support for policies aimed at reducing it. I find that most respondents underestimate the gender pension gap and that treated respondents are less likely to perceive the gender pension gap as fair. In addition, treated respondents perceive the unequal distribution of care work and gender differences in wages as more important drivers of the gap, and their demand for remedial policies such as targeted financial education increases significantly. This increase in policy demand is driven by male respondents and Republicans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents novel causal evidence on the effect of different communication channels employed by central banks on people’s expectations about future inflation. In a pre-registered randomized survey experiment among a representative household sample, we examine adjustment of inflation expectations when confronted with a press conference statement by the president of the European Central Bank (ECB) articulating the bank’s commitment to its 2% inflation target. We show that the medium of communication matters, holding the content of the message constant: Relative to a text transcript, audiovisual mediums strengthen updating toward the inflation target, with dynamic mediums (audio and video) being more effective than static mediums (photo). In a Bayesian updating framework, we find that audiovisual communication increases the signal gain as compared to textual communication, i.e., respondents put more weight on the information they receive. We also show that economically less-informed households (those consuming less economic news) are more responsive in updating to audiovisual mediums. Overall, our results suggest that central bank messages aimed directly at the public can help to anchor inflation expectations.
{"title":"Seeing and hearing is believing: The role of audiovisual communication in shaping inflation expectations","authors":"Elliott Ash, Heiner Mikosch, Alexis Perakis, Samad Sarferaz","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents novel causal evidence on the effect of different communication channels employed by central banks on people’s expectations about future inflation. In a pre-registered randomized survey experiment among a representative household sample, we examine adjustment of inflation expectations when confronted with a press conference statement by the president of the European Central Bank (ECB) articulating the bank’s commitment to its 2% inflation target. We show that the medium of communication matters, holding the content of the message constant: Relative to a text transcript, audiovisual mediums strengthen updating toward the inflation target, with dynamic mediums (audio and video) being more effective than static mediums (photo). In a Bayesian updating framework, we find that audiovisual communication increases the signal gain as compared to textual communication, i.e., respondents put more weight on the information they receive. We also show that economically less-informed households (those consuming less economic news) are more responsive in updating to audiovisual mediums. Overall, our results suggest that central bank messages aimed directly at the public can help to anchor inflation expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105257
Sebastian G. Kessing
A global monopoly supplier country of green goods which are essential for the provision of global environmental public goods optimally subsidizes the export of such goods in an interior contribution equilibrium. This is not counterbalanced by an incentive to improve the terms-of-trade, since any price-induced transfers are off-set by contribution adjustments. By the same logic, a subsidy is costless for the monopoly supplier. The existence of a global monopoly supplier increases global public good supply relative to a competitive setting. The incentive to subsidize persists with impure public goods. Import-dependent countries may also benefit from a monopoly supplier. While they are strategically exploited to increase their contributions to the global public good, they do so at lower costs, and they benefit from increased contributions by the other importer countries.
{"title":"Market power and global public goods","authors":"Sebastian G. Kessing","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105257","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105257","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A global monopoly supplier country of green goods which are essential for the provision of global environmental public goods optimally subsidizes the export of such goods in an interior contribution equilibrium. This is not counterbalanced by an incentive to improve the terms-of-trade, since any price-induced transfers are off-set by contribution adjustments. By the same logic, a subsidy is costless for the monopoly supplier. The existence of a global monopoly supplier increases global public good supply relative to a competitive setting. The incentive to subsidize persists with impure public goods. Import-dependent countries may also benefit from a monopoly supplier. While they are strategically exploited to increase their contributions to the global public good, they do so at lower costs, and they benefit from increased contributions by the other importer countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 105257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}