Generation of specific immune memory by bacterial exposure in the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae)

IF 2.2 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Current Research in Insect Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cris.2024.100085
Nashrin F. Patel , Shüné V. Oliver
{"title":"Generation of specific immune memory by bacterial exposure in the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae)","authors":"Nashrin F. Patel ,&nbsp;Shüné V. Oliver","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a growing body of evidence that invertebrates can generate improved secondary responses after a primary challenge. This immunological memory can be primed by a range of pathogens, including bacteria. The generation of immunological memory has been demonstrated in mosquitoes, with the memory primed by a range of initial stimuli. This study aimed to examine whether insecticide resistance affects the capacity to generate immunological memory. The primary hypothesis was tested by examining the capacity of genetically related laboratory-reared <em>Anopheles arabiensis</em> strains that differ by insecticide resistant phenotype to generate immunological memory. The competing hypothesis tested was that the bacterial virulence was the key determinant in generating immunological memory. Immune memory was generated in F1 females but not males. Immunological memory was demonstrated in both laboratory strains, but the efficacy differed by the insecticide resistant phenotype of the strain. An initial oral challenge provided by a blood meal resulted generated better memory than an oral challenge by sugar. The efficacy of memory generation between the two bacterial strains differed between the two mosquito strains. Regardless of the challenge, the two strains differed in their capacity to generate memory. This study therefore demonstrated that insecticide resistant phenotype affected the capacity of the two strains to generate immunological memory. Although this study needs to be replicated with wild mosquitoes, it does suggest that a potential role for insecticide resistance in the functioning of the immune system and memory generation of <em>An. arabiensis</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000155/pdfft?md5=e49bf5d732199bbc241ef1330c8dcee5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000155-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence that invertebrates can generate improved secondary responses after a primary challenge. This immunological memory can be primed by a range of pathogens, including bacteria. The generation of immunological memory has been demonstrated in mosquitoes, with the memory primed by a range of initial stimuli. This study aimed to examine whether insecticide resistance affects the capacity to generate immunological memory. The primary hypothesis was tested by examining the capacity of genetically related laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis strains that differ by insecticide resistant phenotype to generate immunological memory. The competing hypothesis tested was that the bacterial virulence was the key determinant in generating immunological memory. Immune memory was generated in F1 females but not males. Immunological memory was demonstrated in both laboratory strains, but the efficacy differed by the insecticide resistant phenotype of the strain. An initial oral challenge provided by a blood meal resulted generated better memory than an oral challenge by sugar. The efficacy of memory generation between the two bacterial strains differed between the two mosquito strains. Regardless of the challenge, the two strains differed in their capacity to generate memory. This study therefore demonstrated that insecticide resistant phenotype affected the capacity of the two strains to generate immunological memory. Although this study needs to be replicated with wild mosquitoes, it does suggest that a potential role for insecticide resistance in the functioning of the immune system and memory generation of An. arabiensis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主要疟疾病媒阿拉伯按蚊(双翅目:疟原虫科)通过接触细菌产生特异性免疫记忆
越来越多的证据表明,无脊椎动物在受到初级挑战后能产生更好的次级反应。包括细菌在内的一系列病原体都能激发这种免疫记忆。免疫记忆的产生已在蚊子身上得到证实,一系列初始刺激可激发这种记忆。本研究旨在探讨杀虫剂抗药性是否会影响产生免疫记忆的能力。主要假设是通过检测实验室饲养的阿拉伯按蚊基因相关的品系产生免疫记忆的能力,这些品系的抗杀虫剂表型不同。测试的竞争假设是,细菌毒性是产生免疫记忆的关键因素。F1雌性产生了免疫记忆,而雄性则没有。两种实验室菌株都表现出了免疫记忆,但效果因菌株的抗杀虫剂表型而异。最初口服血粉比口服糖产生的记忆效果更好。两种细菌菌株产生记忆的效果因两种蚊子菌株而异。无论采用哪种挑战方式,两种菌株产生记忆的能力都不同。因此,这项研究表明,抗杀虫剂表型影响了两种菌株产生免疫记忆的能力。虽然这项研究还需要在野生蚊子身上进行复制,但它确实表明了抗杀虫剂性在阿拉伯疟蚊免疫系统的运作和记忆生成中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Insect Science
Current Research in Insect Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 days
期刊最新文献
The nutritional dimension of facultative bacterial symbiosis in aphids: Current status and methodological considerations for future research Diapause survival requires a temperature-sensitive preparatory period Identification of a receptor for the sex pheromone of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus Response of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) genotypes to natural infestation by scale insect pest Stictococcus vayssierei Richard (Hemiptera: Stictococcidae) An enigmatic Cretaceous beetle with possible affinity to Erotylidae (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1