Representative compensation and disability claimant outcomes

IF 4.8 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Public Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105132
Cody Tuttle , Riley Wilson
{"title":"Representative compensation and disability claimant outcomes","authors":"Cody Tuttle ,&nbsp;Riley Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many claimants of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) retain legal representation to help with the approval process. The Social Security Administration imposes strict rules on representative compensation. Representatives are only paid if claimants are awarded disability, and they are paid the lesser of 25 percent of the claimant’s past due benefits or a pre-specified maximum fee ($7,200 since 2022). Because past due benefits are a function of the number of months claimants wait to be awarded, representatives face incentives to delay case resolution until past due benefits push the representative fees past the fee ceiling. We use difference-in-differences to evaluate how these incentives impact SSDI claimant wait times. After the fee ceiling increased in 2002, average wait times increased by 0.85 months among claimants for whom the fee threshold is more binding, implying a 2.6–5.6 month increase for claimants with representatives. This indicates that the structure of representative compensation does matter for case outcomes, and highlights the importance of interactions with auxiliary agents so common in modern social programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 105132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272724000689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many claimants of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) retain legal representation to help with the approval process. The Social Security Administration imposes strict rules on representative compensation. Representatives are only paid if claimants are awarded disability, and they are paid the lesser of 25 percent of the claimant’s past due benefits or a pre-specified maximum fee ($7,200 since 2022). Because past due benefits are a function of the number of months claimants wait to be awarded, representatives face incentives to delay case resolution until past due benefits push the representative fees past the fee ceiling. We use difference-in-differences to evaluate how these incentives impact SSDI claimant wait times. After the fee ceiling increased in 2002, average wait times increased by 0.85 months among claimants for whom the fee threshold is more binding, implying a 2.6–5.6 month increase for claimants with representatives. This indicates that the structure of representative compensation does matter for case outcomes, and highlights the importance of interactions with auxiliary agents so common in modern social programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有代表性的赔偿和伤残索赔结果
许多社会保障伤残保险(SSDI)的申请人都会聘请法律代表来帮助他们完成审批程序。社会保障局对代理人的报酬有严格的规定。只有当申请人获得伤残赔偿时,才会向代理人支付报酬,而且代理人的报酬为申请人过去应付福利金的 25% 或预先规定的最高费用(自 2022 年起为 7,200 美元),以较低者为准。由于逾期福利金是申请人等待获得赔偿的月数的函数,因此代理人有动力推迟案件的解决,直到逾期福利金使代理人费用超过费用上限。我们使用差分法来评估这些激励因素如何影响 SSDI 申请人的等待时间。2002 年酬金上限提高后,酬金门槛对其有更大约束力的申请人的平均等待时间增加了 0.85 个月,这意味着有代表的申请人的等待时间增加了 2.6-5.6 个月。这表明代理人的报酬结构对案件结果确实有影响,并突出了与辅助代理人的互动的重要性,这种互动在现代社会计划中非常普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.
期刊最新文献
Who truly bears (bank) taxes? Evidence from only shifting statutory incidence From viewers to voters: Tracing Fox News’ impact on American democracy All is not lost: Organized crime and social capital formation Editorial Board Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1