A Very British industrial policy: Green finance and the City-Bank-Treasury control of Net Zero

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104020
James Jackson
{"title":"A Very British industrial policy: Green finance and the City-Bank-Treasury control of Net Zero","authors":"James Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In 2017, the UK’s Industrial Strategy was thought to have marked an unconventional moment in British politics, as the state began to explicitly ‘pick the winners’ necessary to both grow and decarbonise the economy. This article demonstrates that a more conventional view of this moment can be found in the pages of the Green Finance Strategies where, contrary to the assumption that a green transformation requires developing domestic capacity in emergent technologies, the UK has instead chosen to be the financier of them. It draws on a novel dataset to find another instance of ‘Treasury Control’, in which large scale investments in low carbon sectors was eschewed to instead 'green' the financial expertise located in the City of London, thereby making green finance British industrial policy. Instead of any industrial transformation of the UK political economy, the pursuit of green finance belies the fact that any such transition, and by extension Net Zero, is shaped by the City-Bank-Treasury nexus' desire to preserve the prevailing economic model with as few adjustments as possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000812/pdfft?md5=6a2fcc4b77655edfde8e55a222683a18&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2017, the UK’s Industrial Strategy was thought to have marked an unconventional moment in British politics, as the state began to explicitly ‘pick the winners’ necessary to both grow and decarbonise the economy. This article demonstrates that a more conventional view of this moment can be found in the pages of the Green Finance Strategies where, contrary to the assumption that a green transformation requires developing domestic capacity in emergent technologies, the UK has instead chosen to be the financier of them. It draws on a novel dataset to find another instance of ‘Treasury Control’, in which large scale investments in low carbon sectors was eschewed to instead 'green' the financial expertise located in the City of London, thereby making green finance British industrial policy. Instead of any industrial transformation of the UK political economy, the pursuit of green finance belies the fact that any such transition, and by extension Net Zero, is shaped by the City-Bank-Treasury nexus' desire to preserve the prevailing economic model with as few adjustments as possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常英国式的产业政策:绿色金融与城市-银行-财政对净零的控制
2017 年,英国的《工业战略》被认为标志着英国政治的一个非常规时刻,因为国家开始明确 "挑选 "经济增长和去碳化所需的 "赢家"。这篇文章表明,对这一时刻更传统的看法可以在《绿色金融战略》中找到,与绿色转型需要发展国内新兴技术能力的假设相反,英国选择成为新兴技术的资助者。本报告利用一个新颖的数据集发现了另一个 "财政控制 "的实例,即放弃对低碳行业的大规模投资,转而 "绿化 "伦敦金融城的金融专业技术,从而使绿色金融成为英国的产业政策。与英国政治经济的任何产业转型相比,对绿色金融的追求掩盖了这样一个事实,即任何此类转型,以及推而广之的 "零净排放",都是由伦敦金融城-银行-财政部之间的关系所决定的,即它们希望在尽可能少的调整下维持现有的经济模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Winds of change – Nomadic grassroots innovations in the maritime shipping sector Retreat or resist: Navigating uncertainties in pastoral Amdo Tibet, China Resilient queer subjects: Lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women on the Israeli periphery Sense of place and micro-business vulnerability to extreme weather in China Conceptualizing labor agency through resilience: Practices of reassembling work on domestic services platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1