Amplified State Capitalism in China: Overproduction, Industrial Policy and Statist Controversies

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development and Change Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1111/dech.12825
Mingtang Liu
{"title":"Amplified State Capitalism in China: Overproduction, Industrial Policy and Statist Controversies","authors":"Mingtang Liu","doi":"10.1111/dech.12825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As China has emerged as a great economic power in the 21st century, comparativists and China scholars have sought to explore the characteristics of China's statist development model. Most accounts, however, have not taken seriously the policy implications of China's macroeconomic imbalance and its tendency to overproduction since the mid-1990s. This article examines China's industrial-policy-centred responses to waves of overproduction crises from the late 1990s to the 2010s. China's expansive industrial policy incorporates demand-side macroeconomic policy and long-term planning for upgrading. This policy framework, designed to preserve the status quo, has been inherently lopsided, and has only served to reproduce China's macroeconomic imbalance. In the context of this persistent imbalance, China's industrial-policy-centred responses have contributed to periodic investment expansion of the state sector relative to the private sector, deepening ambitions around upgrading, and growing controversies regarding its statist model. In short, the statist features of China's economy have been periodically amplified by its particular responses to overproduction. This research shows that far from a statist shift engineered by President Xi Jinping, China's recent statist tendency has deeper historical and structural-macroeconomic roots. This implies that the Chinese state adjusted and intensified its state interventions just as it underwent a profound process of marketization in the late 1990s.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"55 2","pages":"191-218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As China has emerged as a great economic power in the 21st century, comparativists and China scholars have sought to explore the characteristics of China's statist development model. Most accounts, however, have not taken seriously the policy implications of China's macroeconomic imbalance and its tendency to overproduction since the mid-1990s. This article examines China's industrial-policy-centred responses to waves of overproduction crises from the late 1990s to the 2010s. China's expansive industrial policy incorporates demand-side macroeconomic policy and long-term planning for upgrading. This policy framework, designed to preserve the status quo, has been inherently lopsided, and has only served to reproduce China's macroeconomic imbalance. In the context of this persistent imbalance, China's industrial-policy-centred responses have contributed to periodic investment expansion of the state sector relative to the private sector, deepening ambitions around upgrading, and growing controversies regarding its statist model. In short, the statist features of China's economy have been periodically amplified by its particular responses to overproduction. This research shows that far from a statist shift engineered by President Xi Jinping, China's recent statist tendency has deeper historical and structural-macroeconomic roots. This implies that the Chinese state adjusted and intensified its state interventions just as it underwent a profound process of marketization in the late 1990s.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国被放大的国家资本主义:生产过剩、产业政策和国家主义争议
随着中国在 21 世纪崛起为经济大国,比较学家和中国问题学者一直在努力探索中国国家主义发展模式的特点。然而,大多数论述并未认真对待中国宏观经济失衡及其自 20 世纪 90 年代中期以来的生产过剩倾向所带来的政策影响。本文探讨了中国以产业政策为中心应对 20 世纪 90 年代末至 2010 年代一波又一波生产过剩危机的对策。中国的扩张性产业政策包括需求侧宏观经济政策和升级的长期规划。这种旨在维持现状的政策框架本质上是片面的,只会加剧中国宏观经济的失衡。在这种持续失衡的背景下,中国以产业政策为中心的应对措施导致了国有部门相对于私营部门的周期性投资扩张、围绕产业升级的雄心不断深化,以及有关其国家主义模式的争议日益增多。简而言之,中国经济的国家主义特征因其对生产过剩的特殊反应而不时放大。本研究表明,中国近期的国家主义倾向绝非习近平主席一手策划的国家主义转变,而是有着更深层次的历史和宏观经济结构根源。这意味着,中国在 20 世纪 90 年代末经历了深刻的市场化进程,同时调整并加强了国家干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Political Economy of Reparations and the Dialectic of Transnational Capitalism Mobilized Resilience and Development under Sanctions in Iran A Critical Framing of Data for Development: Historicizing Data Relations and AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1