Global plant responses to intensified fire regimes

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/geb.13858
Roger Grau-Andrés, Bruno Moreira, Juli G. Pausas
{"title":"Global plant responses to intensified fire regimes","authors":"Roger Grau-Andrés,&nbsp;Bruno Moreira,&nbsp;Juli G. Pausas","doi":"10.1111/geb.13858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Global change factors, such as warming, heatwaves, droughts and land-use changes, are intensifying fire regimes (defined here as increasing frequency or severity of fires) in many ecosystems worldwide. A large body of local-scale research has shown that such intensified fire regimes can greatly impact on ecosystem structure and function through altering plant communities. Here, we aim to find general patterns of plant responses to intensified fire regimes across climates, habitats and fire regimes at the global scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time period</h3>\n \n <p>Studies published 1962–2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major taxa studied</h3>\n \n <p>Woody plants, herbs and bryophytes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We carried out a global systematic review and meta-analysis of the response of plant abundance, diversity and fitness to increased fire frequency or severity. To assess the context dependency of those responses, we tested the effect of the following variables: fire regime component (fire frequency or severity), time since the last fire, fire type (wildfire or prescribed fire), historical fire regime type (surface or crown fire), plant life form (woody plant, herb or bryophyte), habitat type and climate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Intensified fire regimes reduced overall plant abundance (Hedges' <i>d</i> = −0.24), diversity (<i>d</i> = −0.27), and fitness (<i>d</i> = −0.69). Generally, adverse effects of intensified fire regimes on plants were stronger due to increased severity than frequency, in wildfires compared to prescribed fires, and at shorter times since fire. Adverse effects were also stronger for woody plants than for herbs, and in conifer and mixed forests than in open ecosystems (e.g. grasslands and shrublands).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Intensified fire regimes can substantially alter plant communities in many ecosystems worldwide. Plant responses are influenced by the specific fire regime component that is changing and by the biotic and abiotic conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13858","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Global change factors, such as warming, heatwaves, droughts and land-use changes, are intensifying fire regimes (defined here as increasing frequency or severity of fires) in many ecosystems worldwide. A large body of local-scale research has shown that such intensified fire regimes can greatly impact on ecosystem structure and function through altering plant communities. Here, we aim to find general patterns of plant responses to intensified fire regimes across climates, habitats and fire regimes at the global scale.

Location

Worldwide.

Time period

Studies published 1962–2023.

Major taxa studied

Woody plants, herbs and bryophytes.

Methods

We carried out a global systematic review and meta-analysis of the response of plant abundance, diversity and fitness to increased fire frequency or severity. To assess the context dependency of those responses, we tested the effect of the following variables: fire regime component (fire frequency or severity), time since the last fire, fire type (wildfire or prescribed fire), historical fire regime type (surface or crown fire), plant life form (woody plant, herb or bryophyte), habitat type and climate.

Results

Intensified fire regimes reduced overall plant abundance (Hedges' d = −0.24), diversity (d = −0.27), and fitness (d = −0.69). Generally, adverse effects of intensified fire regimes on plants were stronger due to increased severity than frequency, in wildfires compared to prescribed fires, and at shorter times since fire. Adverse effects were also stronger for woody plants than for herbs, and in conifer and mixed forests than in open ecosystems (e.g. grasslands and shrublands).

Main conclusions

Intensified fire regimes can substantially alter plant communities in many ecosystems worldwide. Plant responses are influenced by the specific fire regime component that is changing and by the biotic and abiotic conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球植物对强化火灾机制的反应
目的全球变化因素,如气候变暖、热浪、干旱和土地使用的变化,正在加剧全球许多生态系统的火灾机制(此处定义为火灾频率或严重程度的增加)。大量地方规模的研究表明,这种加剧的火灾机制会通过改变植物群落对生态系统结构和功能产生巨大影响。我们对植物丰度、多样性和适应性对火灾频率或严重程度增加的反应进行了全球系统回顾和荟萃分析。为了评估这些反应的环境依赖性,我们测试了以下变量的影响:火灾机制成分(火灾频率或严重程度)、自上次火灾以来的时间、火灾类型(野火或规定火灾)、历史火灾机制类型(地表火或树冠火)、植物生命形式(木本植物、草本植物或红叶植物)、栖息地类型和气候。结果强化的火灾机制降低了植物的总体丰度(Hedges' d = -0.24)、多样性(d = -0.27)和适应性(d = -0.69)。一般来说,强化火灾机制对植物的不利影响更强,原因是火灾的严重程度比频率更高,野火比明火更严重,而且火灾发生的时间更短。对木本植物的不利影响也强于草本植物,针叶林和混交林的不利影响强于开阔生态系统(如草地和灌木林)。植物的反应受正在发生变化的特定火系成分以及生物和非生物条件的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Fine-Grain Predictions Are Key to Accurately Represent Continental-Scale Biodiversity Patterns Issue Information Thermal Forcing Versus Chilling? Misspecification of Temperature Controls in Spring Phenology Models Predicting Landscape Conversion Impact on Small Mammal Occurrence and the Transmission of Parasites in the Atlantic Forest Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1