Excess mortality in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae091
Ingeborg Forthun, Christian Madsen, Louise Emilsson, Anton Nilsson, Kasper P Kepp, Jonas Björk, Stein Emil Vollset, Tea Lallukka, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen
{"title":"Excess mortality in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022.","authors":"Ingeborg Forthun, Christian Madsen, Louise Emilsson, Anton Nilsson, Kasper P Kepp, Jonas Björk, Stein Emil Vollset, Tea Lallukka, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Nordic countries represent a unique case study for the COVID-19 pandemic due to socioeconomic and cultural similarities, high-quality comparable administrative register data and notable differences in mitigation policies during the pandemic. We aimed to compare weekly excess mortality in the Nordic countries across the three full pandemic years 2020-2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data on weekly all-cause mortality from official administrative registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, we employed time series regression models to assess mortality developments within each pandemic year, with the period 2010-2019 used as reference period. We then compared excess mortality across the countries in 2020-2022, taking differences in population size and age- and sex-distribution into account. Results were age- and sex-standardized to the Danish population of 2020. Robustness was examined with a variety of sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While Sweden experienced excess mortality in 2020 [75 excess deaths per 100 000 population (95% prediction interval 29-122)], Denmark, Finland and Norway experienced excess mortality in 2022 [52 (14-90), 130 (83-177) and 88 (48-128), respectively]. Weekly death data reveal how mortality started to increase in mid-2021 in Denmark, Finland and Norway, and continued above the expected level through 2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the Nordic countries experienced relatively low pandemic excess mortality, the impact and timing of excess mortality differed substantially. These estimates-arguably the most accurate available for any region in capturing pandemic-related excess deaths-may inform future research and policy regarding the complex mortality dynamics in times of a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"737-743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Nordic countries represent a unique case study for the COVID-19 pandemic due to socioeconomic and cultural similarities, high-quality comparable administrative register data and notable differences in mitigation policies during the pandemic. We aimed to compare weekly excess mortality in the Nordic countries across the three full pandemic years 2020-2022.

Methods: Using data on weekly all-cause mortality from official administrative registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, we employed time series regression models to assess mortality developments within each pandemic year, with the period 2010-2019 used as reference period. We then compared excess mortality across the countries in 2020-2022, taking differences in population size and age- and sex-distribution into account. Results were age- and sex-standardized to the Danish population of 2020. Robustness was examined with a variety of sensitivity analyses.

Results: While Sweden experienced excess mortality in 2020 [75 excess deaths per 100 000 population (95% prediction interval 29-122)], Denmark, Finland and Norway experienced excess mortality in 2022 [52 (14-90), 130 (83-177) and 88 (48-128), respectively]. Weekly death data reveal how mortality started to increase in mid-2021 in Denmark, Finland and Norway, and continued above the expected level through 2022.

Conclusion: Although the Nordic countries experienced relatively low pandemic excess mortality, the impact and timing of excess mortality differed substantially. These estimates-arguably the most accurate available for any region in capturing pandemic-related excess deaths-may inform future research and policy regarding the complex mortality dynamics in times of a health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020-2022 年 COVID-19 大流行期间丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的超额死亡率。
背景:由于社会经济和文化的相似性、高质量的可比行政登记数据以及大流行期间缓解政策的显著差异,北欧国家是 COVID-19 大流行的独特案例研究对象。我们的目的是比较北欧国家在 2020-2022 年三个完整的大流行年的每周超额死亡率:利用丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典官方行政登记的每周全因死亡率数据,我们采用时间序列回归模型评估了每个大流行年的死亡率发展情况,并将 2010-2019 年作为参照期。然后,考虑到人口规模、年龄和性别分布的差异,我们比较了 2020-2022 年各国的超额死亡率。结果已按 2020 年丹麦人口的年龄和性别标准化。通过各种敏感性分析检验了稳健性:结果:瑞典在 2020 年出现了超额死亡率[每 10 万人超额死亡 75 例(95% 预测区间 29-122)],而丹麦、芬兰和挪威则在 2022 年出现了超额死亡率[分别为 52 例(14-90)、130 例(83-177)和 88 例(48-128)]。每周死亡数据显示,丹麦、芬兰和挪威的死亡率从2021年中期开始上升,并一直持续到2022年,高于预期水平:尽管北欧国家经历的大流行超额死亡率相对较低,但超额死亡率的影响和时间却大不相同。这些估计值可以说是目前任何地区在捕捉与大流行相关的超额死亡人数方面最准确的估计值,可为未来有关 COVID-19 大流行等健康危机时期复杂死亡率动态的研究和政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Access points to different levels of health care over 13 years. Utilization behaviour in a changing health care system. Results of a three-wave cross-sectional series in Austria. Causal association of physical activity with lymphoma risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Public health approaches to 'Leave No One Behind' in heatwave resilience: insights from the UK. Intermarriage and mortality among Finnish migrants in Sweden: a prospective register study using binational data. Lessons learned from Taiwan's response to the COVID-19 pandemic: successes, challenges, and implications for future pandemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1