Association of baseline factors with 1-year outcomes in the SB11-ranibizumab equivalence trial: A post hoc analysis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100069
Se Joon Woo , Jin Ah Jung , Taehyung Kim , Inkyung Oh , Mercy Yeeun Kim , Neil M. Bressler
{"title":"Association of baseline factors with 1-year outcomes in the SB11-ranibizumab equivalence trial: A post hoc analysis","authors":"Se Joon Woo ,&nbsp;Jin Ah Jung ,&nbsp;Taehyung Kim ,&nbsp;Inkyung Oh ,&nbsp;Mercy Yeeun Kim ,&nbsp;Neil M. Bressler","doi":"10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To identify baseline factors associated with 1-year outcomes when treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 or reference ranibizumab (rRBZ), and to compare efficacy of the two products within subgroups judged to be clinically relevant.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Post hoc analysis of a prospective, equivalence phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT)</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>705 patients with nAMD were randomized 1:1 to receive SB11 or rRBZ for 48 weeks. Pooled and randomized groups were used to identify baseline factors associated with clinical outcomes at Week 52 using multiple linear regression models. Significant factors identified in regression analyses were confirmed in analyses of variance. Subgroup analyses comparing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes between SB11 and rRBZ were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>634 (89.9%) participants completed the 52-week visit. Regression analyses showed that younger age, lower BCVA, and smaller total lesion area at baseline were associated with greater BCVA gain at Week 52, while older age, lower BCVA, and thicker central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline were predictors of greater CST reduction in the pooled group. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that BCVA outcomes appeared comparable for the SB11 and rRBZ groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Post hoc analyses of the SB11-rRBZ equivalence study showed that baseline age, BCVA, CST, and total lesion area were prognostic factors for visual or anatomical outcomes of nAMD, while subgroup analyses demonstrated comparable results for SB11 and rRBZ. Collectively, the results appear comparable to similar RCTs of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor reference products for nAMD and strengthen confidence in the biosimilarity of SB11.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8594,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000707/pdfft?md5=c8cf11a3be79272bfc0b578ca7da56fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2162098924000707-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924000707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To identify baseline factors associated with 1-year outcomes when treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 or reference ranibizumab (rRBZ), and to compare efficacy of the two products within subgroups judged to be clinically relevant.

Design

Post hoc analysis of a prospective, equivalence phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT)

Methods

705 patients with nAMD were randomized 1:1 to receive SB11 or rRBZ for 48 weeks. Pooled and randomized groups were used to identify baseline factors associated with clinical outcomes at Week 52 using multiple linear regression models. Significant factors identified in regression analyses were confirmed in analyses of variance. Subgroup analyses comparing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes between SB11 and rRBZ were conducted.

Results

634 (89.9%) participants completed the 52-week visit. Regression analyses showed that younger age, lower BCVA, and smaller total lesion area at baseline were associated with greater BCVA gain at Week 52, while older age, lower BCVA, and thicker central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline were predictors of greater CST reduction in the pooled group. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that BCVA outcomes appeared comparable for the SB11 and rRBZ groups.

Conclusion

Post hoc analyses of the SB11-rRBZ equivalence study showed that baseline age, BCVA, CST, and total lesion area were prognostic factors for visual or anatomical outcomes of nAMD, while subgroup analyses demonstrated comparable results for SB11 and rRBZ. Collectively, the results appear comparable to similar RCTs of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor reference products for nAMD and strengthen confidence in the biosimilarity of SB11.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SB11-拉尼珠单抗等效试验中基线因素与 1 年疗效的关系:事后分析
目的:确定使用雷尼珠单抗生物类似物SB11或参考雷尼珠单抗(rRBZ)治疗新生血管性老年黄斑变性(nAMD)时与1年疗效相关的基线因素,并比较两种产品在被判定为临床相关的亚组中的疗效:方法:705 例 nAMD 患者按 1:1 随机分配接受 SB11 或 rRBZ 治疗 48 周。使用多元线性回归模型对汇总组和随机组进行分析,以确定与第 52 周临床结果相关的基线因素。回归分析中确定的重要因素在方差分析中得到了证实。还进行了分组分析,比较 SB11 和 rRBZ 的最佳矫正视力 (BCVA) 变化:634名参与者(89.9%)完成了为期52周的访问。回归分析表明,年龄较小、BCVA 较低和基线总病变面积较小与第 52 周 BCVA 增幅较大相关,而年龄较大、BCVA 较低和基线中央子场厚度 (CST) 较厚则是汇总组 CST 降低幅度较大的预测因素。亚组分析表明,SB11组和rRBZ组的BCVA结果似乎相当:SB11-rRBZ等效研究的事后分析表明,基线年龄、BCVA、CST和总病变面积是nAMD视觉和解剖结果的预后因素,而亚组分析表明SB11和rRBZ的结果具有可比性。总之,这些结果与治疗 nAMD 的抗血管内皮生长因子参考产品的类似 RCT 结果相当,增强了人们对 SB11 生物相似性的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, a bimonthly, peer-reviewed online scientific publication, is an official publication of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology (APAO), a supranational organization which is committed to research, training, learning, publication and knowledge and skill transfers in ophthalmology and visual sciences. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology welcomes review articles on currently hot topics, original, previously unpublished manuscripts describing clinical investigations, clinical observations and clinically relevant laboratory investigations, as well as .perspectives containing personal viewpoints on topics with broad interests. Editorials are published by invitation only. Case reports are generally not considered. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology covers 16 subspecialties and is freely circulated among individual members of the APAO’s member societies, which amounts to a potential readership of over 50,000.
期刊最新文献
Development and testing of Artificial Intelligence based mobile application to achieve cataract backlog-free status in Uttar Pradesh, India. Comment on “Update on coronavirus disease 2019: Ophthalmic manifestations and adverse reactions to vaccination” An unusual iris in Waardenburg syndrome Managing a patient with uveitis in the era of artificial intelligence: Current approaches, emerging trends, and future perspectives Diversity, equity and inclusion in curriculum vitae for medical and surgical specialty training college entrance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1