Efficacy and safety of spironolactone versus bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss: A retrospective comparative study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Australasian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1111/ajd.14306
Abhijeet Kumar Jha MD FRCP, MD Zeeshan MD, Anupama Singh MD, DNB, Anil Kumar Singh MD, DNB, DM (Endocrinology)
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of spironolactone versus bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss: A retrospective comparative study","authors":"Abhijeet Kumar Jha MD FRCP,&nbsp;MD Zeeshan MD,&nbsp;Anupama Singh MD, DNB,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Singh MD, DNB, DM (Endocrinology)","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Female-pattern hair loss (FPHL) is characterized by decreased scalp hair density, thinning of hair shafts, and progressive miniaturization of hair follicles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the safety and efficacy of spironolactone versus bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss [FPHL].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study design was retrospective, and all eligible females aged between 18 years and 50 years with FPHL were included. We identified 120 patients from our database who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and patients were then categorized into two groups, Group A comprising patients who were taking 100 mg of spironolactone once daily and Group B comprising patients who were taking 50 mg of bicalutamide once daily along with topical minoxidil 2% in both groups. Patient were analysed at approximately at 24 weeks from the commencement of the treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean reduction in hair loss severity score on Sinclair scale was 19.51% in spironolactone group compared to 28.20% in bicalutamide group at 24 weeks, which was statistically significant. On global photographic assessment, marked improvement was seen in bicalutamide group compared to spironolactone group (<i>p</i> = 0.139).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study, though limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, showed that bicalutamide has greater efficacy and better safety profile in comparison to spironolactone in the treatment of FPHL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Female-pattern hair loss (FPHL) is characterized by decreased scalp hair density, thinning of hair shafts, and progressive miniaturization of hair follicles.

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of spironolactone versus bicalutamide in female pattern hair loss [FPHL].

Methods

The study design was retrospective, and all eligible females aged between 18 years and 50 years with FPHL were included. We identified 120 patients from our database who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and patients were then categorized into two groups, Group A comprising patients who were taking 100 mg of spironolactone once daily and Group B comprising patients who were taking 50 mg of bicalutamide once daily along with topical minoxidil 2% in both groups. Patient were analysed at approximately at 24 weeks from the commencement of the treatment.

Results

Mean reduction in hair loss severity score on Sinclair scale was 19.51% in spironolactone group compared to 28.20% in bicalutamide group at 24 weeks, which was statistically significant. On global photographic assessment, marked improvement was seen in bicalutamide group compared to spironolactone group (p = 0.139).

Conclusions

Our study, though limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, showed that bicalutamide has greater efficacy and better safety profile in comparison to spironolactone in the treatment of FPHL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺内酯与比卡鲁胺对女性脱发的疗效和安全性:回顾性比较研究。
背景:女性脱发(FPHL女性型脱发(FPHL)的特征是头皮毛发密度下降、毛干变细和毛囊逐渐变小:比较螺内酯与比卡鲁胺治疗女性型脱发[FPHL]的安全性和有效性:研究设计为回顾性,纳入所有符合条件的 18 至 50 岁女性 FPHL 患者。我们从数据库中确定了 120 名符合纳入和排除标准的患者,然后将患者分为两组,A 组包括每天服用一次 100 毫克螺内酯的患者,B 组包括每天服用一次 50 毫克比卡鲁胺的患者,两组患者均外用 2% 米诺地尔。在治疗开始约 24 周后对患者进行分析:24周时,螺内酯组脱发严重程度在辛克莱评分表上的平均减分率为19.51%,而比卡鲁胺组为28.20%,差异具有统计学意义。在整体照片评估方面,比卡鲁胺组比螺内酯组有明显改善(p = 0.139):我们的研究虽然受限于其回顾性设计和较小的样本量,但结果表明,与螺内酯相比,比卡鲁胺在治疗FPHL方面具有更高的疗效和更好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
期刊最新文献
A reply to: 'Melanoma documented arising in an involuting naevus 3 years after cessation of monitoring'. Interleukin-17 inhibitors for the management of severe rosacea. Re: The risk of psychiatric disorders in finasteride users with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA): A population-based case-control study. Dermoscopic features of the normal vermilion in skin of colour. JAK inhibitors in refractory dermatomyositis: A case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1