Yucheng Xia , Yuhang Liu , Tianhao Li , Sihan He , Hong Chang , Yaqing Wang , Yongqing Zhang , Wenyi Ge
{"title":"Assessing parameter efficient methods for pre-trained language model in annotating scRNA-seq data","authors":"Yucheng Xia , Yuhang Liu , Tianhao Li , Sihan He , Hong Chang , Yaqing Wang , Yongqing Zhang , Wenyi Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Annotating cell types of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is crucial for studying cellular heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment. Recently, large-scale pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved significant progress in cell-type annotation of scRNA-seq data. This approach effectively addresses previous methods' shortcomings in performance and generalization. However, fine-tuning PLMs for different downstream tasks demands considerable computational resources, rendering it impractical. Hence, a new research branch introduces parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). This involves optimizing a few parameters while leaving the majority unchanged, leading to substantial reductions in computational expenses. Here, we utilize scBERT, a large-scale pre-trained model, to explore the capabilities of three PEFT methods in scRNA-seq cell type annotation. Extensive benchmark studies across several datasets demonstrate the superior applicability of PEFT methods. Furthermore, downstream analysis using models obtained through PEFT showcases their utility in novel cell type discovery and model interpretability for potential marker genes. Our findings underscore the considerable potential of PEFT in PLM-based cell type annotation, presenting novel perspectives for the analysis of scRNA-seq data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"228 ","pages":"Pages 12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Annotating cell types of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is crucial for studying cellular heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment. Recently, large-scale pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved significant progress in cell-type annotation of scRNA-seq data. This approach effectively addresses previous methods' shortcomings in performance and generalization. However, fine-tuning PLMs for different downstream tasks demands considerable computational resources, rendering it impractical. Hence, a new research branch introduces parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). This involves optimizing a few parameters while leaving the majority unchanged, leading to substantial reductions in computational expenses. Here, we utilize scBERT, a large-scale pre-trained model, to explore the capabilities of three PEFT methods in scRNA-seq cell type annotation. Extensive benchmark studies across several datasets demonstrate the superior applicability of PEFT methods. Furthermore, downstream analysis using models obtained through PEFT showcases their utility in novel cell type discovery and model interpretability for potential marker genes. Our findings underscore the considerable potential of PEFT in PLM-based cell type annotation, presenting novel perspectives for the analysis of scRNA-seq data.
期刊介绍:
Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences.
Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.