The impact of incident stroke on cognitive trajectories in later life.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1186/s13195-024-01479-8
Swarna Vishwanath, Ingrid Hopper, Geoffrey C Cloud, Trevor T-J Chong, Raj C Shah, Geoffrey A Donnan, Jeff D Williamson, Charles B Eaton, Rory Wolfe, Christopher M Reid, Andrew M Tonkin, Suzanne G Orchard, Sharyn Fitzgerald, Anne M Murray, Robyn L Woods, Mark R Nelson, Ajay Sood, Claire J Steves, Joanne Ryan
{"title":"The impact of incident stroke on cognitive trajectories in later life.","authors":"Swarna Vishwanath, Ingrid Hopper, Geoffrey C Cloud, Trevor T-J Chong, Raj C Shah, Geoffrey A Donnan, Jeff D Williamson, Charles B Eaton, Rory Wolfe, Christopher M Reid, Andrew M Tonkin, Suzanne G Orchard, Sharyn Fitzgerald, Anne M Murray, Robyn L Woods, Mark R Nelson, Ajay Sood, Claire J Steves, Joanne Ryan","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01479-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common after stroke, and a large proportion of stroke patients will develop dementia. However, there have been few large prospective studies which have assessed cognition both prior to and after stroke. This study aims to determine the extent to which incident stroke impacts different domains of cognitive function in a longitudinal cohort of older community-dwelling individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>19,114 older individuals without cardiovascular disease or major cognitive impairment were recruited and followed over a maximum 11 years. Stroke included ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke and was adjudicated by experts. Cognitive function was assessed regularly using Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Linear mixed models were used to investigate the change in cognition at the time of stroke and decline in cognitive trajectories following incident stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up period of 8.4 [IQR: 7.2, 9.6] years, 815 (4.3%) participants experienced a stroke. Over this time, there was a general decline observed in 3MS, HVLT-R delayed recall, and SDMT scores across participants. However, for individuals who experienced a stroke, there was a significantly greater decline across all cognitive domains immediately after the event immediately after the event (3MS: -1.03 [95%CI: -1.45, -0.60]; HVLT-R: -0.47 [-0.70, -0.24]; SDMT: -2.82 [-3.57, -2.08]; COWAT: -0.67 [-1.04, -0.29]) and a steeper long-term decline for three of these domains (3MS -0.62 [-0.88, -0.35]; COWAT: -0.30 [-0.46, -0.14]); HVLT-R: -0.12 [95%CI, -0.70, -0.24]). However individuals with stroke experienced no longer-term decline in SDMT compared to the rest of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for comprehensive neuropsychology assessments for ongoing monitoring of cognition following incident stroke; and potential early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01479-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common after stroke, and a large proportion of stroke patients will develop dementia. However, there have been few large prospective studies which have assessed cognition both prior to and after stroke. This study aims to determine the extent to which incident stroke impacts different domains of cognitive function in a longitudinal cohort of older community-dwelling individuals.

Methods: 19,114 older individuals without cardiovascular disease or major cognitive impairment were recruited and followed over a maximum 11 years. Stroke included ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke and was adjudicated by experts. Cognitive function was assessed regularly using Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Linear mixed models were used to investigate the change in cognition at the time of stroke and decline in cognitive trajectories following incident stroke.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 8.4 [IQR: 7.2, 9.6] years, 815 (4.3%) participants experienced a stroke. Over this time, there was a general decline observed in 3MS, HVLT-R delayed recall, and SDMT scores across participants. However, for individuals who experienced a stroke, there was a significantly greater decline across all cognitive domains immediately after the event immediately after the event (3MS: -1.03 [95%CI: -1.45, -0.60]; HVLT-R: -0.47 [-0.70, -0.24]; SDMT: -2.82 [-3.57, -2.08]; COWAT: -0.67 [-1.04, -0.29]) and a steeper long-term decline for three of these domains (3MS -0.62 [-0.88, -0.35]; COWAT: -0.30 [-0.46, -0.14]); HVLT-R: -0.12 [95%CI, -0.70, -0.24]). However individuals with stroke experienced no longer-term decline in SDMT compared to the rest of the participants.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for comprehensive neuropsychology assessments for ongoing monitoring of cognition following incident stroke; and potential early intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风对晚年认知轨迹的影响。
背景:认知功能障碍在中风后很常见,很大一部分中风患者会发展成痴呆。然而,很少有大型前瞻性研究对中风前后的认知能力进行评估。本研究旨在确定在社区居住的老年人纵向队列中,中风事件对认知功能不同领域的影响程度。方法:招募 19,114 名无心血管疾病或严重认知障碍的老年人,并对其进行最长 11 年的随访。中风包括缺血性中风和出血性中风,由专家裁定。认知功能定期使用改良版迷你精神状态检查(3MS)、霍普金斯言语学习测验-修订版(HVLT-R)、符号数字模型测验(SDMT)和受控口头单词联想测验(COWAT)进行评估。采用线性混合模型研究中风时认知能力的变化以及中风后认知能力下降的轨迹:结果:在中位数为 8.4 [IQR: 7.2, 9.6] 年的随访期间,有 815 人(4.3%)经历了中风。在此期间,观察到所有参与者的 3MS、HVLT-R 延迟回忆和 SDMT 分数普遍下降。然而,对于经历过中风的人来说,在事件发生后的第一时间,所有认知领域的得分都出现了明显的下降(3MS:-1.03 [95%CI: -1.45, -0.60];HVLT-R:-0.47[-0.70,-0.24];SDMT:-2.82[-3.57,-2.08];COWAT:-0.67[-1.04,-0.29]),其中三个领域的长期下降幅度更大(3MS:-0.62[-0.88,-0.35];COWAT:-0.30[-0.46,-0.14]);HVLT-R:-0.12[95%CI,-0.70,-0.24])。然而,与其他参与者相比,中风患者的 SDMT 没有出现长期下降:这些研究结果突出表明,有必要进行全面的神经心理学评估,以持续监测脑卒中患者的认知能力,并进行潜在的早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Facial aging, cognitive impairment, and dementia risk. Exploring easily accessible neurophysiological biomarkers for predicting Alzheimer's disease progression: a systematic review. Sex-specific risk factors and clinical dementia outcomes for white matter hyperintensities in a large South Korean cohort. Perivascular space enlargement accelerates in ageing and Alzheimer's disease pathology: evidence from a three-year longitudinal multicentre study. Assessing the metabolism of the olfactory circuit by use of 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in patients suspected of suffering from Alzheimer's disease or frontotemporal dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1