The Global Impact of Diversifying PrEP Options: Results of an International Discrete Choice Experiment of Existing and Potential PrEP Strategies with Gay and Bisexual Men and Physicians.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY AIDS research and human retroviruses Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1089/AID.2023.0120
Christine Tagliaferri Rael, Rebecca Giguere, Ewa Bryndza Tfaily, Sara Sutton, Elizabeth Horn, Robert J Schieffer, Craig Hendrix, Richard T D'Aquila, Thomas J Hope
{"title":"The Global Impact of Diversifying PrEP Options: Results of an International Discrete Choice Experiment of Existing and Potential PrEP Strategies with Gay and Bisexual Men and Physicians.","authors":"Christine Tagliaferri Rael, Rebecca Giguere, Ewa Bryndza Tfaily, Sara Sutton, Elizabeth Horn, Robert J Schieffer, Craig Hendrix, Richard T D'Aquila, Thomas J Hope","doi":"10.1089/AID.2023.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To improve current and future use of existing (oral, injectable) and potential future (implants, douches) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products, we must understand product preferences relative to one another, among gay and bisexual men (GBM), and physicians who prescribe PrEP. We completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) with separate groups of GBM and/or physicians from the United States, South Africa, Spain, and Thailand. Participants were presented information on PrEP products, including daily pills, event-driven pills (2-1-1 regimen), injections, subdermal implants (dissolvable, removable), and rectal douches. Next, they completed a choice exercise in which they were shown 10 screens, each presenting 3 of the aforementioned products at a time with 11 attributes for physicians and 10 attributes for GBM. For the attributes that were not constant, one level was shown per screen for each product. Participants selected the product they preferred most and rated their likelihood to select (GBM) or recommend (physicians) that product. Data were modeled using hierarchical Bayes estimation; resulting model coefficients were used to develop attribute importance measures and product preferences. For GBM across all countries, if all aforementioned PrEP products were on the market at the same time, over 90% of GBM would use some form of PrEP; 100% of physicians would recommend at least one of the PrEP products. There were variations in product preference by country. GBM in the United States and Thailand preferred the injection (21.7%, 22.9%, respectively), while the dissolvable implant was preferred in South Africa and Spain (19.9%, 19.8%, respectively). In the United States, South Africa, and Spain (where physician data were available), physicians were most likely to recommend the dissolvable implant (37.2%, 40.6%, 38.3%, respectively).</p>","PeriodicalId":7544,"journal":{"name":"AIDS research and human retroviruses","volume":" ","pages":"591-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS research and human retroviruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2023.0120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve current and future use of existing (oral, injectable) and potential future (implants, douches) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products, we must understand product preferences relative to one another, among gay and bisexual men (GBM), and physicians who prescribe PrEP. We completed an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) with separate groups of GBM and/or physicians from the United States, South Africa, Spain, and Thailand. Participants were presented information on PrEP products, including daily pills, event-driven pills (2-1-1 regimen), injections, subdermal implants (dissolvable, removable), and rectal douches. Next, they completed a choice exercise in which they were shown 10 screens, each presenting 3 of the aforementioned products at a time with 11 attributes for physicians and 10 attributes for GBM. For the attributes that were not constant, one level was shown per screen for each product. Participants selected the product they preferred most and rated their likelihood to select (GBM) or recommend (physicians) that product. Data were modeled using hierarchical Bayes estimation; resulting model coefficients were used to develop attribute importance measures and product preferences. For GBM across all countries, if all aforementioned PrEP products were on the market at the same time, over 90% of GBM would use some form of PrEP; 100% of physicians would recommend at least one of the PrEP products. There were variations in product preference by country. GBM in the United States and Thailand preferred the injection (21.7%, 22.9%, respectively), while the dissolvable implant was preferred in South Africa and Spain (19.9%, 19.8%, respectively). In the United States, South Africa, and Spain (where physician data were available), physicians were most likely to recommend the dissolvable implant (37.2%, 40.6%, 38.3%, respectively).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多样化 PrEP 选择的全球影响:针对男同性恋者、双性恋者(GBM)和医生的现有和潜在 PrEP 策略的国际离散选择实验结果》(PrEP International Discrete Choice Experiment of Existing and Potential PrEP Strategies with Gay and Bisexual Men (GBM) and Physicians)。
为了提高现有(口服、注射)和未来潜在(植入、冲洗)PrEP 产品的使用率,我们必须了解男同性恋和双性恋者(GBM)以及开具 PrEP 处方的医生对产品的偏好。我们与来自美国、南非、西班牙和泰国的男同性恋者和/或医生分别进行了一次在线离散选择实验(DCE)。实验向参与者展示了 PrEP 产品的相关信息,包括每日药片、事件驱动药片(2-1-1 方案)、注射剂、皮下植入物(可溶解、可移除)和直肠冲洗剂。接下来,他们完成了一个选择练习,在这个练习中,他们会看到 10 个屏幕,每个屏幕一次显示上述产品中的三种,其中医生有 11 个属性,GBM 有 10 个属性。对于不固定的属性,每种产品在每个屏幕上显示一个等级。参与者选择他们最喜欢的产品,并对他们选择(GBM)或推荐(医生)该产品的可能性进行评分。使用层次贝叶斯估计法对数据进行建模;得出的模型系数用于制定属性重要性度量和产品偏好。对于所有国家的 GBM 而言,如果上述所有 PrEP 产品同时上市,90% 以上的 GBM 会使用某种形式的 PrEP;100% 的医生会推荐至少一种 PrEP 产品。不同国家对产品的偏好存在差异。美国和泰国的 GBM 首选注射剂(分别为 21.7%和 22.9%),而南非和西班牙的 GBM 首选可溶解植入剂(分别为 19.9%和 19.8%)。在美国、南非和西班牙(有医生数据),医生最有可能推荐可溶解性植入物(分别为 37.2%、40.6% 和 38.3%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses was the very first AIDS publication in the field over 30 years ago, and today it is still the critical resource advancing research in retroviruses, including AIDS. The Journal provides the broadest coverage from molecular biology to clinical studies and outcomes research, focusing on developments in prevention science, novel therapeutics, and immune-restorative approaches. Cutting-edge papers on the latest progress and research advances through clinical trials and examination of targeted antiretroviral agents lead to improvements in translational medicine for optimal treatment outcomes. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses coverage includes: HIV cure research HIV prevention science - Vaccine research - Systemic and Topical PreP Molecular and cell biology of HIV and SIV Developments in HIV pathogenesis and comorbidities Molecular biology, immunology, and epidemiology of HTLV Pharmacology of HIV therapy Social and behavioral science Rapid publication of emerging sequence information.
期刊最新文献
The Risk Factors of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Susceptibility and Clinical Features in HIV-Positive Patients with Anal Condyloma Acuminatum: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Exploring the Role of Gut Vascular Barrier Proteins in HIV-Induced Mucosal Damage: A Comparative Study. Receipt of Prostate-Specific Antigen Test in Medicaid Beneficiaries With and Without HIV in 2001-2015 in 14 States. Comparing Gold-Standard Sanger Sequencing with Two Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms of HIV-1 gp160 Single Genome Amplicons. An Integrated DAIDS Laboratory Oversight Framework: Application of the DAIDS GCLP Guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1