Power wheelchair usage and repair are associated: a retrospective analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2353861
Anand Mhatre, Cassandra Loew, Ekim Yurtsever, Colin Mair
{"title":"Power wheelchair usage and repair are associated: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Anand Mhatre, Cassandra Loew, Ekim Yurtsever, Colin Mair","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2353861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: This study evaluates the effect of power wheelchair telemonitoring and battery charging training on user charging behavior and repair measures and assesses the relationship between wheelchair usage and repair measures to support technician-led servicing.<b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective analysis of two matched cohorts with a total of <i>n</i>=237 users from the NHS service dataset. In the training cohort, a wheelchair usage telemonitoring device monitored the battery usage of <i>n</i>=119 power wheelchair users for 12 months. Users whose battery charging behavior was not optimal were instructed on appropriate charging practices. Wheelchair usage parameters of wheelchair drive and power time every month were used to predict repairs and associated costs.<b>Results</b>: Fifty-four out of 119 users in the training cohort did not charge batteries regularly and were instructed on appropriate charging. Twenty-six of them changed their behavior and charged their batteries every night. This cohort experienced reduced battery repairs by 18%, wheelchair repairs by 11%, and repair costs by £3,092 compared to a matched standard care cohort (<i>n</i>=118). User age and drive time were associated with repair measures. Drive time predicted time-to-failure for wheelchair parts and classified failure risk with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as 0.71 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; <i>p</i><.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: By leveraging the significant relationships between wheelchair usage and repairs, wheelchair users at risk of part failures can be identified, and technician-led servicing tools for proactive interventions can be developed. Wheelchair battery health telemonitoring and instructing users on appropriate battery charging reduced repairs and associated costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2353861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the effect of power wheelchair telemonitoring and battery charging training on user charging behavior and repair measures and assesses the relationship between wheelchair usage and repair measures to support technician-led servicing.Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of two matched cohorts with a total of n=237 users from the NHS service dataset. In the training cohort, a wheelchair usage telemonitoring device monitored the battery usage of n=119 power wheelchair users for 12 months. Users whose battery charging behavior was not optimal were instructed on appropriate charging practices. Wheelchair usage parameters of wheelchair drive and power time every month were used to predict repairs and associated costs.Results: Fifty-four out of 119 users in the training cohort did not charge batteries regularly and were instructed on appropriate charging. Twenty-six of them changed their behavior and charged their batteries every night. This cohort experienced reduced battery repairs by 18%, wheelchair repairs by 11%, and repair costs by £3,092 compared to a matched standard care cohort (n=118). User age and drive time were associated with repair measures. Drive time predicted time-to-failure for wheelchair parts and classified failure risk with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as 0.71 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<.001). Conclusions: By leveraging the significant relationships between wheelchair usage and repairs, wheelchair users at risk of part failures can be identified, and technician-led servicing tools for proactive interventions can be developed. Wheelchair battery health telemonitoring and instructing users on appropriate battery charging reduced repairs and associated costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动轮椅的使用与维修相关:一项回顾性分析。
目的:本研究评估了电动轮椅远程监控和电池充电培训对用户充电行为和维修措施的影响,并评估了轮椅使用和维修措施之间的关系,以支持技术人员主导的维修:这是对两个匹配队列的回顾性分析,共有来自英国国家医疗服务系统服务数据集的 237 名用户。在培训队列中,轮椅使用情况远程监控设备对119名电动轮椅使用者的电池使用情况进行了为期12个月的监控。对电池充电行为不理想的用户进行了适当的充电指导。每月轮椅驱动和动力时间等轮椅使用参数用于预测维修和相关费用:在接受培训的 119 名用户中,有 54 人没有定期给电池充电,他们接受了适当充电的指导。其中 26 人改变了行为,每晚都给电池充电。与匹配的标准护理队列(人数=118)相比,该队列的电池维修率降低了18%,轮椅维修率降低了11%,维修成本降低了3,092英镑。用户年龄和驾驶时间与维修措施有关。驾驶时间可预测轮椅部件的故障时间,并对故障风险进行分类,接收器工作特征曲线下的面积为0.71(95% CI 0.61至0.82;p结论:通过利用轮椅使用和维修之间的重要关系,可以识别出有部件故障风险的轮椅用户,并开发出由技术人员主导的维修工具,以进行主动干预。轮椅电池健康远程监控和指导用户对电池进行适当充电可减少维修次数和相关费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of factors affecting axle load and friction forces in a wheelchair. Tools and devices for telerehabilitation in pediatric and adult cystic fibrosis patients: a scoping review. Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot. Bridging gaps in technology adoption for disabilities. Estimating power wheelchair electronics lifespan based on real-world data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1