Comparison of inter-joint coordination strategies during activities of daily living with prosthetic and anatomical limbs

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Human Movement Science Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2024.103228
Christina Lee , Deanna H. Gates
{"title":"Comparison of inter-joint coordination strategies during activities of daily living with prosthetic and anatomical limbs","authors":"Christina Lee ,&nbsp;Deanna H. Gates","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2024.103228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While healthy individuals have redundant degrees of freedom of the joints, they coordinate their multi-joint movements such that the redundancy is effectively reduced. Achieving high inter-joint coordination may be difficult for upper limb prosthesis users due to the lack of proprioceptive feedback and limited motion of the terminal device. This study compared inter-joint coordination between prosthesis users and individuals without limb loss during different upper limb activities of daily living (ADLs). Nine unilateral prosthesis users (five males) and nine age- and sex-matched controls without limb loss completed three unilateral and three bilateral ADLs. Principal component analysis was applied to the three-dimensional motion trajectories of the trunk and arms to identify coordinative patterns. For each ADL, we quantified the cumulative variance accounted for (VAF) of the first five principal components (pcs), which was the lowest number of pcs that could achieve 90% VAF in control limb movements across all ADLs (5 <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span> n <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span> 9). The VAF was lower for movements involving a prosthesis compared to those completed by controls across all ADLs (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The pc waveforms were similar between movements involving a prosthesis and movements completed by control participants for pc1 (<em>r</em> &gt; 0.78, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The magnitude of the relationship for pc2 and pc3 differed between ADLs, with the strongest correlation for symmetric bilateral ADLs (0.67 <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span> r <span><math><mo>≤</mo></math></span> 0.97, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Collectively, this study demonstrates that activities of daily living were completed with distinct coordination strategies in prosthesis users compared to individuals without limb loss. Future work should explore how device features, such as the availability of sensory feedback or motorized wrist joints influence multi-joint coordination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945724000514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While healthy individuals have redundant degrees of freedom of the joints, they coordinate their multi-joint movements such that the redundancy is effectively reduced. Achieving high inter-joint coordination may be difficult for upper limb prosthesis users due to the lack of proprioceptive feedback and limited motion of the terminal device. This study compared inter-joint coordination between prosthesis users and individuals without limb loss during different upper limb activities of daily living (ADLs). Nine unilateral prosthesis users (five males) and nine age- and sex-matched controls without limb loss completed three unilateral and three bilateral ADLs. Principal component analysis was applied to the three-dimensional motion trajectories of the trunk and arms to identify coordinative patterns. For each ADL, we quantified the cumulative variance accounted for (VAF) of the first five principal components (pcs), which was the lowest number of pcs that could achieve 90% VAF in control limb movements across all ADLs (5 n 9). The VAF was lower for movements involving a prosthesis compared to those completed by controls across all ADLs (p < 0.001). The pc waveforms were similar between movements involving a prosthesis and movements completed by control participants for pc1 (r > 0.78, p < 0.001). The magnitude of the relationship for pc2 and pc3 differed between ADLs, with the strongest correlation for symmetric bilateral ADLs (0.67 r 0.97, p < 0.001). Collectively, this study demonstrates that activities of daily living were completed with distinct coordination strategies in prosthesis users compared to individuals without limb loss. Future work should explore how device features, such as the availability of sensory feedback or motorized wrist joints influence multi-joint coordination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较假肢和解剖肢体在日常生活活动中的关节间协调策略。
虽然健康人的关节具有冗余自由度,但他们会协调多关节运动,从而有效降低冗余度。对于上肢假肢使用者来说,由于缺乏本体感觉反馈和终端设备的运动受限,要实现高度的关节间协调可能比较困难。本研究比较了假肢使用者与无肢体缺失者在不同上肢日常生活活动(ADL)中的关节间协调性。九名单侧假肢使用者(五名男性)和九名年龄和性别匹配的无肢体缺失对照者分别完成了三项单侧和三项双侧 ADL。我们对躯干和手臂的三维运动轨迹进行了主成分分析,以确定协调模式。对于每项日常活动,我们量化了前五个主成分的累积方差占比(VAF),这是在所有日常活动中控制肢体运动的方差占比能达到 90% 的最低主成分数量(5 ≤ n ≤ 9)。与对照组相比,在所有 ADL 动作中,假肢动作的 VAF 均低于对照组(p 0.78,p 0.78)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Movement Science
Human Movement Science 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
89
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome. These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."
期刊最新文献
Effects of freezing of gait on vertical ground reaction force in Parkinson's disease Synergy in motion: Exploring the similarity and variability of muscle synergy patterns in healthy individuals Concentric exercise-induced fatigue of the shoulder impairs proprioception but not motor control or performance in healthy young adults Influence of exercise-induced hamstrings fatigue on proprioceptive reweighting strategies and postural performance in bipedal stance in recreational athletes Domain-specific balance training reduces slip-related fall risk in young adults: A potential alternative to perturbation training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1