Short communication: Storage time and temperature affect plasma osmolality values in field-collected blood samples

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111665
Nemo E. Buchmiller, Savannah J. Weaver , Robin E. Bedard, Emily N. Taylor, Haley A. Moniz
{"title":"Short communication: Storage time and temperature affect plasma osmolality values in field-collected blood samples","authors":"Nemo E. Buchmiller,&nbsp;Savannah J. Weaver ,&nbsp;Robin E. Bedard,&nbsp;Emily N. Taylor,&nbsp;Haley A. Moniz","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As climate change alters the hydric regime of many habitats, understanding the hydric physiology of animals becomes increasingly important. Plasma osmolality is a popular metric to assess an organism's hydration, but samples often need to be stored before being analyzed, under varying conditions and for different lengths of time. Previous studies on plasma storage conditions, and how they impact sample integrity, are minimal and have focused more on clinical applications than field studies. We studied the stability of osmolality values from wild rattlesnake plasma samples stored in commonly used plastic snap-cap tubes under different time (0, 2, 3, 7, 29 days) and temperature (refrigerated at 2 °C and frozen at −18 °C) treatments. We hypothesized that frozen samples would remain more stable (e.g., retain osmolality values more similar to baseline values) than refrigerated samples because freezing the plasma would reduce evaporation. We found that osmolality of samples increased over time at both temperatures, becoming significantly higher than baseline after 7 days. Contrary to our prediction, osmolality increased more in frozen samples than in refrigerated samples. We discuss possible reasons for our results, along with their implications. To obtain the most accurate plasma osmolality values, we recommend refrigerating plasma samples for as short a time as possible, 3 days or fewer, before analyzing them on an osmometer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55237,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095643324000928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As climate change alters the hydric regime of many habitats, understanding the hydric physiology of animals becomes increasingly important. Plasma osmolality is a popular metric to assess an organism's hydration, but samples often need to be stored before being analyzed, under varying conditions and for different lengths of time. Previous studies on plasma storage conditions, and how they impact sample integrity, are minimal and have focused more on clinical applications than field studies. We studied the stability of osmolality values from wild rattlesnake plasma samples stored in commonly used plastic snap-cap tubes under different time (0, 2, 3, 7, 29 days) and temperature (refrigerated at 2 °C and frozen at −18 °C) treatments. We hypothesized that frozen samples would remain more stable (e.g., retain osmolality values more similar to baseline values) than refrigerated samples because freezing the plasma would reduce evaporation. We found that osmolality of samples increased over time at both temperatures, becoming significantly higher than baseline after 7 days. Contrary to our prediction, osmolality increased more in frozen samples than in refrigerated samples. We discuss possible reasons for our results, along with their implications. To obtain the most accurate plasma osmolality values, we recommend refrigerating plasma samples for as short a time as possible, 3 days or fewer, before analyzing them on an osmometer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简短通讯:储存时间和温度对野外采集血液样本血浆渗透压值的影响
随着气候变化改变了许多栖息地的水文系统,了解动物的水文生理学变得越来越重要。血浆渗透压是评估生物体水合状态的常用指标,但样本在分析前通常需要在不同条件下储存不同时间。以前关于血浆储存条件及其如何影响样本完整性的研究很少,而且更多侧重于临床应用而非实地研究。我们研究了在不同时间(0、2、3、7、29 天)和温度(2 °C冷藏和 -18 °C冷冻)条件下,野生响尾蛇血浆样本在常用塑料管中储存的渗透压值的稳定性。我们假设冷冻样本会比冷藏样本更稳定(例如,保持渗透压值更接近基线值),因为冷冻血浆会减少蒸发。我们发现,在两种温度下,样本的渗透压都会随着时间的推移而升高,7 天后明显高于基线值。与我们的预测相反,冷冻样本的渗透压比冷藏样本增加得更多。我们将讨论产生这些结果的可能原因及其影响。为了获得最准确的血浆渗透压值,我们建议在渗透压仪上分析血浆样本之前,将其冷藏尽可能短的时间,3 天或更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology of Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. This journal covers molecular, cellular, integrative, and ecological physiology. Topics include bioenergetics, circulation, development, excretion, ion regulation, endocrinology, neurobiology, nutrition, respiration, and thermal biology. Study on regulatory mechanisms at any level of organization such as signal transduction and cellular interaction and control of behavior are also published.
期刊最新文献
Characterization and functional analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter 1 under nitrite stress Commentary: Best practices for performing olfactory behavioral assays on aquatic animals: A guide for comparative physiologists Haemolysis overestimates plasma oxidative stress biomarkers in a free-ranging mammal: The case of roe deer. Inferring the metabolic rate of bone Evolution of the thirst mechanism in Homo: The need and limitations of thirst and hydration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1