The role of self-reported and physiological stress in nocebo hyperalgesia.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108818
A Skvortsova, S H Meeuwis, S Derksen, K Kerkkänen, E Sutter, A W M Evers, D S Veldhuijzen
{"title":"The role of self-reported and physiological stress in nocebo hyperalgesia.","authors":"A Skvortsova, S H Meeuwis, S Derksen, K Kerkkänen, E Sutter, A W M Evers, D S Veldhuijzen","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative expectations can increase pain sensitivity, leading to nocebo hyperalgesia. However, the physiological and psychological factors that predispose individuals to this phenomenon are still not well understood. The present study examined whether stress induced by a social stressor affects nocebo hyperalgesia, and whether this effect is mediated by self-reported and physiological stress responses. We recruited 52 healthy participants (15 men) who were randomly assigned to either the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control condition (a friendly version of the TSST). Nocebo hyperalgesia was induced using negative suggestions combined with a validated pain conditioning paradigm. We assessed self-reported (anxiety and stress) and physiological (cortisol, alpha-amylase, heart rate, and skin conductance) responses to stress. Both groups exhibited significant nocebo hyperalgesia. The stress group showed higher levels of anxiety, self-reported stress, and cortisol levels compared to the control group while no significant differences were found in other physiological markers. The stress and control groups did not differ in the magnitude of nocebo hyperalgesia, but anxiety levels partially mediated the effects of the stress test on nocebo hyperalgesia. Our findings suggest that an external social stressor does not directly affect nocebo hyperalgesia, but that increased anxiety due to the stressor enhances its magnitude. Thus, it may be worthwhile to investigate whether reducing stress-related anxiety in clinical settings would help alleviate nocebo effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"108818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative expectations can increase pain sensitivity, leading to nocebo hyperalgesia. However, the physiological and psychological factors that predispose individuals to this phenomenon are still not well understood. The present study examined whether stress induced by a social stressor affects nocebo hyperalgesia, and whether this effect is mediated by self-reported and physiological stress responses. We recruited 52 healthy participants (15 men) who were randomly assigned to either the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) or a control condition (a friendly version of the TSST). Nocebo hyperalgesia was induced using negative suggestions combined with a validated pain conditioning paradigm. We assessed self-reported (anxiety and stress) and physiological (cortisol, alpha-amylase, heart rate, and skin conductance) responses to stress. Both groups exhibited significant nocebo hyperalgesia. The stress group showed higher levels of anxiety, self-reported stress, and cortisol levels compared to the control group while no significant differences were found in other physiological markers. The stress and control groups did not differ in the magnitude of nocebo hyperalgesia, but anxiety levels partially mediated the effects of the stress test on nocebo hyperalgesia. Our findings suggest that an external social stressor does not directly affect nocebo hyperalgesia, but that increased anxiety due to the stressor enhances its magnitude. Thus, it may be worthwhile to investigate whether reducing stress-related anxiety in clinical settings would help alleviate nocebo effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我报告和生理压力在预兆超痛感中的作用
负面期望会增加疼痛的敏感性,从而导致 "前兆痛觉减退"(nocebo hyperalgesia)。然而,人们对导致这种现象的生理和心理因素仍不甚了解。本研究探讨了由社会压力诱发的压力是否会影响假性痛觉亢进,以及这种影响是否由自我报告和生理压力反应介导。我们招募了 52 名健康参与者(15 名男性),他们被随机分配到特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)或对照组(友好版 TSST)。我们使用负面建议结合经过验证的疼痛条件反射范式来诱导患者产生 "预感过度疼痛"。我们评估了自我报告(焦虑和压力)和生理(皮质醇、α-淀粉酶、心率和皮肤传导)对压力的反应。两组患者均表现出明显的 "预兆性 "痛觉亢进。与对照组相比,压力组的焦虑水平、自我报告的压力水平和皮质醇水平更高,而其他生理指标则无明显差异。压力组和对照组在假定超痛感的程度上没有差异,但焦虑水平在一定程度上介导了压力测试对假定超痛感的影响。我们的研究结果表明,外部社会压力并不会直接影响假想超感,但压力导致的焦虑增加会增强假想超感的程度。因此,在临床环境中减少与压力相关的焦虑是否有助于减轻虚幻效应可能值得研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
WACARDIA: graphical MATLAB software for Wireless Assessment of CARDiac Interoceptive Accuracy. Expectation to rewards modulates learning emotional words: Evidence from a hierarchical Bayesian model Multimodal neuroimaging of hierarchical cognitive control Face emojis vs. Non-face emojis: Exploring neural mechanisms in text processing Multiple risk markers for increases in depression symptoms across two years: Evidence from the reward positivity and the error-related negativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1