Colon Age: A Metric for Whether and How to Screen Male Veterans for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Thomas F Imperiale, Laura J Myers, Barry C Barker, Timothy E Stump, Joanne K Daggy
{"title":"Colon Age: A Metric for Whether and How to Screen Male Veterans for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Thomas F Imperiale, Laura J Myers, Barry C Barker, Timothy E Stump, Joanne K Daggy","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to develop a metric for estimating risk for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) to help decide whether and how to screen persons < age 50. We used risk prediction models derived and validated on male Veterans to calculate the relative risks (RRs) for 6 scenarios: one low-risk scenario (no risk factors present), four intermediate risk scenarios (some factors present), and one high-risk scenario (all factors present) for three age groups (35-39, 40-44, and 45-49 years). For each scenario, we estimated absolute CRC risk using SEER CRC incidence rates and each scenario's RR. We identified the current SEER 5-year age group to which the revised estimate was closest and refer to the midpoint of this group as the \"colon age\". When the revised estimate was ≥ that for 50-54-year-olds and for 70-74-year-olds, respective recommendations were made for (any) CRC screening and screening with colonoscopy. Among the scenarios, there was inconsistency between the two models for the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups, with only the 15-variable model recommending screening for the higher-risk 35-to-39-year-olds. Both models recommended screening for some intermediate risk and high-risk 40-44-year-olds. The models were well-aligned on whether and how to screen most 45-49-year-olds. Using risk factors for EOCRC with CRC incidence rates, \"colon age\" may be useful for shared decision making about whether and how to screen male Veterans < 50 years. For 45-49-year-olds, the 7-variable model may be preferred by patients, providers, and health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to develop a metric for estimating risk for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) to help decide whether and how to screen persons < age 50. We used risk prediction models derived and validated on male Veterans to calculate the relative risks (RRs) for 6 scenarios: one low-risk scenario (no risk factors present), four intermediate risk scenarios (some factors present), and one high-risk scenario (all factors present) for three age groups (35-39, 40-44, and 45-49 years). For each scenario, we estimated absolute CRC risk using SEER CRC incidence rates and each scenario's RR. We identified the current SEER 5-year age group to which the revised estimate was closest and refer to the midpoint of this group as the "colon age". When the revised estimate was ≥ that for 50-54-year-olds and for 70-74-year-olds, respective recommendations were made for (any) CRC screening and screening with colonoscopy. Among the scenarios, there was inconsistency between the two models for the 35-39 and 40-44 age groups, with only the 15-variable model recommending screening for the higher-risk 35-to-39-year-olds. Both models recommended screening for some intermediate risk and high-risk 40-44-year-olds. The models were well-aligned on whether and how to screen most 45-49-year-olds. Using risk factors for EOCRC with CRC incidence rates, "colon age" may be useful for shared decision making about whether and how to screen male Veterans < 50 years. For 45-49-year-olds, the 7-variable model may be preferred by patients, providers, and health systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠年龄:是否及如何筛查男性退伍军人早期结直肠癌的标准。
我们的目标是开发一种估算早发结直肠癌 (EOCRC) 风险的指标,以帮助决定是否以及如何对年龄小于 50 岁的人群进行筛查。我们使用在男性退伍军人中得出并经过验证的风险预测模型来计算 6 种情况的相对风险 (RR):一种低风险情况(不存在风险因素)、四种中度风险情况(存在一些因素)和一种高风险情况(存在所有因素),针对三个年龄组(35-39 岁、40-44 岁和 45-49 岁)。对于每种情景,我们使用 SEER CRC 发病率和每种情景的 RR 值估算 CRC 绝对风险。我们确定了修订估计值最接近的当前 SEER 5 年年龄组,并将该年龄组的中点称为 "结肠年龄"。当修订后的估计值≥50-54 岁年龄组和 70-74 岁年龄组时,分别推荐进行(任何)CRC 筛查和结肠镜筛查。在各种方案中,对于 35-39 岁和 40-44 岁年龄组,两种模型的建议并不一致,只有 15 变量模型建议对 35-39 岁的高风险人群进行筛查。两个模型都建议对 40-44 岁的一些中危和高危人群进行筛查。在是否筛查以及如何筛查大多数 45-49 岁人群的问题上,两个模型的观点非常一致。利用 EOCRC 风险因素和 CRC 发病率,"结肠年龄 "可能有助于共同决策是否以及如何对年龄小于 50 岁的男性退伍军人进行筛查。对于 45-49 岁的人群,患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统可能更倾向于使用 7 变量模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calculating future 10-year breast cancer risks in risk-adapted surveillance: A method comparison and application in clinical practice. Metabolic phenotype and risk of obesity-related cancers in the Women's Health Initiative. What's the Cost: Financial Toxicity and Screening Fatigue in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. Black raspberry modulates cecal and oral microbiome at the early stage of a dibenzo[def,p]chrysene-induced murine oral cancer model. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1