Interventions in ambulatory healthcare settings to reduce social isolation among adults aged 18-64: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0119
Kavya Anchuri, Liane Steiner, Roxana Rabet, A. Craig-Neil, Ellah San Antonio, Segun Oluwasegun Ogundele, Melanie Seabrook, Ceinwen Pope, Serina Dai, Andrée Schuler, Carolyn Ziegler, Andrew David Pinto
{"title":"Interventions in ambulatory healthcare settings to reduce social isolation among adults aged 18-64: a systematic review.","authors":"Kavya Anchuri, Liane Steiner, Roxana Rabet, A. Craig-Neil, Ellah San Antonio, Segun Oluwasegun Ogundele, Melanie Seabrook, Ceinwen Pope, Serina Dai, Andrée Schuler, Carolyn Ziegler, Andrew David Pinto","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSocial isolation is associated with increased all-cause and premature mortality, poor chronic disease management, and mental health concerns. Limited research exists on interventions addressing social isolation among individuals under 65 despite its increasing prevalence among young and middle-aged adults.\n\n\nAIM\nTo identify interventions from the extant literature that address social isolation and loneliness in ambulatory healthcare settings in adults aged 18-64, and to identify elements of successful studies for future intervention design.\n\n\nDESIGN & SETTING\nSystematic review of interventions targeting social isolation in community-dwelling adults aged 18-64 within ambulatory healthcare settings.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, CINAHL and PsychInfo. Data were extracted on study design and setting, intervention type, outcome related to social isolation/loneliness and scale of measure used.\n\n\nRESULTS\n25,078 citations were identified and underwent title and abstract screening. 75 articles met our inclusion criteria and were synthesised, including an assessment of bias. Effective interventions were delivered in community health settings, incorporated a group component, and used digital technologies. They also addressed the association between mental health and social isolation using CBT approaches and enhanced self-management and coping strategies for chronic conditions through psycho-educational interventions.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFuture research should prioritise adults living in low- and middle-income countries, racialized individuals, as well as those with fewer educational opportunities. There is also a need to advance research in primary care settings, where longitudinal patient-provider relationships would facilitate the success of interventions.","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Social isolation is associated with increased all-cause and premature mortality, poor chronic disease management, and mental health concerns. Limited research exists on interventions addressing social isolation among individuals under 65 despite its increasing prevalence among young and middle-aged adults. AIM To identify interventions from the extant literature that address social isolation and loneliness in ambulatory healthcare settings in adults aged 18-64, and to identify elements of successful studies for future intervention design. DESIGN & SETTING Systematic review of interventions targeting social isolation in community-dwelling adults aged 18-64 within ambulatory healthcare settings. METHOD A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, CINAHL and PsychInfo. Data were extracted on study design and setting, intervention type, outcome related to social isolation/loneliness and scale of measure used. RESULTS 25,078 citations were identified and underwent title and abstract screening. 75 articles met our inclusion criteria and were synthesised, including an assessment of bias. Effective interventions were delivered in community health settings, incorporated a group component, and used digital technologies. They also addressed the association between mental health and social isolation using CBT approaches and enhanced self-management and coping strategies for chronic conditions through psycho-educational interventions. CONCLUSION Future research should prioritise adults living in low- and middle-income countries, racialized individuals, as well as those with fewer educational opportunities. There is also a need to advance research in primary care settings, where longitudinal patient-provider relationships would facilitate the success of interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在流动医疗机构中采取干预措施,减少 18-64 岁成年人的社会隔离:系统综述。
背景社会隔离与全因死亡率和过早死亡率上升、慢性病管理不善以及心理健康问题有关。AIM To identify interventions from the extant literature that addressing social isolation and loneliness in ambulatory healthcare settings in adults aged 18-64, and to identify elements of successful studies for future intervention design.DESIGN & SETTINGSystematic review of interventions targeting social isolation in community-dwelling adults aged 18-64 within ambulatory healthcare settings.METHOD A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles in the following databases:制定了检索策略,在以下数据库中查找相关文章:Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、EBM Reviews、Scopus、CINAHL 和 PsychInfo。提取的数据包括研究设计和环境、干预类型、与社会隔离/孤独相关的结果以及所使用的测量量表。结果共识别出 25,078 篇引文,并对其进行了标题和摘要筛选。75篇文章符合我们的纳入标准,并进行了综合,包括偏倚评估。有效的干预措施都是在社区卫生环境中实施的,包含小组内容,并使用了数字技术。这些干预措施还利用 CBT 方法解决了心理健康与社会隔离之间的关联,并通过心理教育干预措施加强了慢性病的自我管理和应对策略。此外,还需要推进初级保健环境中的研究,因为在初级保健环境中,患者与提供者之间的纵向关系将有助于干预措施取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study. Mental healthcare and pragmatic shared decision-making in general practice: An interview study. Treating the perimenopause in the UK armed forces: a mixed methods review exploring the confidence of general practitioners. Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person paediatric consultations and role of the carers. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1