Mohammad Shahin Alam, K. Williams-Whitt, DuckJung Shin, Mahfooz Ansari
{"title":"Motivating supervisors during disability accommodation: a comprehensive examination on job demand and resources theories","authors":"Mohammad Shahin Alam, K. Williams-Whitt, DuckJung Shin, Mahfooz Ansari","doi":"10.1108/ijm-10-2023-0620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study develops and tests a comprehensive model that examines whether dimensions of supervisors’ job demands and resources influence their work motivation through their job strain levels while managing disability accommodation (DA).Design/methodology/approachThe proposed model leverages the assumptions of established job demand and resources theories, including demand-ability fit, job demand-control, job demand-control-support, and effort-reward balance models. Then, we tested with the quantitative data from 335 British, Canadian, American, Australian, Dutch, and German supervisors with recent DA experience.FindingsThis study found support for the proposed model. Job control and social support directly affected work motivation, while job strain did not mediate the relationship between job control and social support and work motivation. The results suggest that employers looking to improve the likelihood of DA success should focus on providing adequate job control, social support, and rewards to supervisors responsible for accommodating employees with disabilities.Practical implicationsThis research enhances our understanding of how additional DA responsibilities impact supervisors and aids in the development of effective DA management policies and interventions, providing robust support for practitioners.Originality/valueThis study contributes to extending the DA literature by testing the applicability of different theoretical models to explain the effect of the additional DA responsibility on supervisors’ job demand, strain, and motivation levels and identify the resources to mitigate them.","PeriodicalId":47915,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Manpower","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Manpower","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-10-2023-0620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeThis study develops and tests a comprehensive model that examines whether dimensions of supervisors’ job demands and resources influence their work motivation through their job strain levels while managing disability accommodation (DA).Design/methodology/approachThe proposed model leverages the assumptions of established job demand and resources theories, including demand-ability fit, job demand-control, job demand-control-support, and effort-reward balance models. Then, we tested with the quantitative data from 335 British, Canadian, American, Australian, Dutch, and German supervisors with recent DA experience.FindingsThis study found support for the proposed model. Job control and social support directly affected work motivation, while job strain did not mediate the relationship between job control and social support and work motivation. The results suggest that employers looking to improve the likelihood of DA success should focus on providing adequate job control, social support, and rewards to supervisors responsible for accommodating employees with disabilities.Practical implicationsThis research enhances our understanding of how additional DA responsibilities impact supervisors and aids in the development of effective DA management policies and interventions, providing robust support for practitioners.Originality/valueThis study contributes to extending the DA literature by testing the applicability of different theoretical models to explain the effect of the additional DA responsibility on supervisors’ job demand, strain, and motivation levels and identify the resources to mitigate them.
目的本研究开发并测试了一个综合模型,该模型考察了主管的工作需求和资源维度是否会通过他们在管理残疾人住宿(DA)时的工作压力水平来影响他们的工作积极性。然后,我们用来自 335 名英国、加拿大、美国、澳大利亚、荷兰和德国的具有近期 DA 经验的主管的定量数据进行了测试。工作控制和社会支持直接影响了工作积极性,而工作压力并没有调节工作控制和社会支持与工作积极性之间的关系。研究结果表明,雇主若想提高残疾人工作的成功率,就应该注重为负责为残疾员工提供便利的主管提供充分的工作控制、社会支持和奖励。这项研究加深了我们对额外的残疾人工作责任如何影响主管的理解,有助于制定有效的残疾人工作管理政策和干预措施,为从业人员提供强有力的支持。原创性/价值本研究通过测试不同理论模型的适用性来解释额外的伤残津贴责任对主管的工作需求、压力和动力水平的影响,并确定缓解这些影响的资源,从而为扩展伤残津贴文献做出了贡献。
期刊介绍:
■Employee welfare ■Human aspects during the introduction of technology ■Human resource recruitment, retention and development ■National and international aspects of HR planning ■Objectives of human resource planning and forecasting requirements ■The working environment