Clinical utility of the novel oncological criteria of resectability for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver Cancer Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1159/000539381
J. Shindoh, Yusuke Kawamura, Keiichi Akahoshi, Masaru Matsumura, S. Okubo, Norio Akuta, Minoru Tanabe, N. Kokudo, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, M. Hashimoto
{"title":"Clinical utility of the novel oncological criteria of resectability for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"J. Shindoh, Yusuke Kawamura, Keiichi Akahoshi, Masaru Matsumura, S. Okubo, Norio Akuta, Minoru Tanabe, N. Kokudo, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, M. Hashimoto","doi":"10.1159/000539381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real world clinical practice. Methods: This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (Population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (Population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2) and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in Population 1. In Population2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, P = 0.023) and curative-intent conversion surgery (BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%, P = 0.056) after lenvatinib therapy, and was also predictive of the overall survival (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.38 for BR2 [vs. BR1]) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.17 for BR2 [vs. BR1]). Conclusion: The resectaility classification based on the noverl oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.","PeriodicalId":510489,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real world clinical practice. Methods: This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (Population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (Population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2) and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in Population 1. In Population2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, P = 0.023) and curative-intent conversion surgery (BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%, P = 0.056) after lenvatinib therapy, and was also predictive of the overall survival (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.38 for BR2 [vs. BR1]) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.17 for BR2 [vs. BR1]). Conclusion: The resectaility classification based on the noverl oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期肝细胞癌可切除性新型肿瘤学标准的临床实用性
简介:肝细胞癌(HCC)新系统疗法的引入促使人们制定了可切除性的新肿瘤学标准。本研究旨在验证基于新标准的可切除性分类在实际临床实践中的预后能力和临床实用性。研究方法这项研究的对象是1822名接受过HCC根治性切除术的患者(人群1)和107名接受过来伐替尼治疗的无法切除的患者(人群2)。根据新的可切除性肿瘤学标准将患者分为三组(R,可切除;BR1,边缘可切除1;BR2,边缘可切除2),并研究了这种基于新标准的分类的预后能力和临床实用性。结果多变量分析证实,在人群1中,根据肿瘤可切除性标准对患者进行分类与总生存率(BR1:危险比[HR],1.88;95% CI,1.38-2.55;BR2:HR,4.12;95% CI,3.01-5.65)和无复发生存率(BR1:HR,1.86;95% CI,1.44-2.41;BR2:HR,3.62;95% CI,2.71-4.82)显著相关。在研究对象 2 中,可切除性分级与额外干预(手术、经动脉化疗栓塞或放疗)的成功率(BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%,P = 0.023)和治愈意图转换手术的成功率(BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%,P = 0.023)相关。1% vs. BR2 4.2%, P = 0.056),还可预测总生存期(BR2 [vs. BR1],HR,1.96;95% CI,1.13-3.38)和治疗失败时间(BR2 [vs. BR1],HR,1.81;95% CI,1.04-3.17)。结论基于noverl肿瘤学可切除性标准的可切除性分类对手术和药物治疗的晚期HCC患者都显示出了可接受的预后能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of the novel oncological criteria of resectability for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma A Changing Role of TACE in the Era of ICI plus Anti-VEGF/TKI plus TACE: From Total Embolization to Partial Embolization (Immune Boost TACE) Reply to the letter regarding ‘Impact of Bevacizumab Being Skipped due to Adverse Events of Special Interest for Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab: An Exploratory Analysis of the Phase III IMbrave150 Study’ Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Anti-VEGF/TKIs Combined with TACE (Triple Therapy) in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Disease etiology impact on outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: a real-world, multicenter study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1