Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Muhammad Reza, S. A. Nursyirwan
{"title":"Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding","authors":"Muhammad Reza, S. A. Nursyirwan","doi":"10.24871/251202483-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common case of emergency in daily clinical practice with a fairly high mortality rate. The use of tranexamic acid, which has been recommended in managing trauma bleeding, may serve as an alternative pharmacological therapy to manage bleeding in non-variceal UGIB. This evidence-based case report aims to evaluate the impact of tranexamic acid on managing bleeding, risk of mortality, and thromboembolic event in non-variceal UGIB patients.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on 4 databases: CDSR, EMBASE, PubMed, and Scopus for meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria formulated a-priori with subsequent critical appraisal according to the OCEBM critical appraisal tools. Result: Meta analyses by Kamal, et al (2020) and Twum-Barimah, et al (2020) were included in our report. Kamal, et al shows no significant difference in mortality in tranexamic acid use compared to placebo (RR 0.84; 95%CI 0.63–1.11; I2=2%). Similarly, although Twum-Barimah reported tranexamic acid reduced risk of mortality compared to placebo (RR 0.45; 95%CI 0.23–0.88; p=0.02; I2 = 0%), none of the RCTs included shows significant result when observed individually. In addition, Kamal, et al also reported increased risk of vein thromboembolic events in high-dose tranexamic acid administration (RR 2.21; 95%CI 1.32–3.69; I2=0%) compared to low-dose administration, in UGIB patients.Conclusion: Tranexamic acid is not recommended to be used in managing bleeding in patients non-variceal UGIB patients and may increase the risk of thromboembolic event.","PeriodicalId":515400,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"30 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24871/251202483-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common case of emergency in daily clinical practice with a fairly high mortality rate. The use of tranexamic acid, which has been recommended in managing trauma bleeding, may serve as an alternative pharmacological therapy to manage bleeding in non-variceal UGIB. This evidence-based case report aims to evaluate the impact of tranexamic acid on managing bleeding, risk of mortality, and thromboembolic event in non-variceal UGIB patients.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on 4 databases: CDSR, EMBASE, PubMed, and Scopus for meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria formulated a-priori with subsequent critical appraisal according to the OCEBM critical appraisal tools. Result: Meta analyses by Kamal, et al (2020) and Twum-Barimah, et al (2020) were included in our report. Kamal, et al shows no significant difference in mortality in tranexamic acid use compared to placebo (RR 0.84; 95%CI 0.63–1.11; I2=2%). Similarly, although Twum-Barimah reported tranexamic acid reduced risk of mortality compared to placebo (RR 0.45; 95%CI 0.23–0.88; p=0.02; I2 = 0%), none of the RCTs included shows significant result when observed individually. In addition, Kamal, et al also reported increased risk of vein thromboembolic events in high-dose tranexamic acid administration (RR 2.21; 95%CI 1.32–3.69; I2=0%) compared to low-dose administration, in UGIB patients.Conclusion: Tranexamic acid is not recommended to be used in managing bleeding in patients non-variceal UGIB patients and may increase the risk of thromboembolic event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨甲环酸治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血
背景:非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(UGIB)是日常临床实践中常见的急诊病例,死亡率相当高。氨甲环酸已被推荐用于处理创伤出血,可作为处理非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的替代药物疗法。本循证病例报告旨在评估氨甲环酸对控制非静脉曲张性 UGIB 患者出血、死亡风险和血栓栓塞事件的影响:在 4 个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索:方法:在 4 个数据库(CDSR、EMBASE、PubMed 和 Scopus)中进行了系统性文献检索。根据事先制定的纳入和排除标准对研究进行筛选,随后根据 OCEBM 的关键评估工具进行关键评估。结果Kamal等人(2020年)和Twum-Barimah等人(2020年)的元分析被纳入我们的报告。Kamal等人的研究显示,使用氨甲环酸与使用安慰剂相比,死亡率无明显差异(RR 0.84;95%CI 0.63-1.11;I2=2%)。同样,尽管Twum-Barimah报告氨甲环酸与安慰剂相比降低了死亡风险(RR 0.45;95%CI 0.23-0.88;P=0.02;I2=0%),但在单独观察时,所纳入的所有临床试验均未显示出显著结果。此外,Kamal等人还报告称,与低剂量氨甲环酸相比,UGIB患者服用大剂量氨甲环酸发生静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险增加(RR 2.21;95%CI 1.32-3.69;I2=0%):结论:不建议将氨甲环酸用于治疗非静脉曲张性 UGIB 患者的出血,因为氨甲环酸可能会增加血栓栓塞事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Knowledge and behavior of Indonesian Mothers About Infantile Colic Correlation of Simple Laboratory Result Parameters to CTP and MELD Scores, and the Diagnostic Role of Simple Laboratory Indexes to Cirrhosis Decompansation Current Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Transforming Screening, Risk Stratification, and Treatment Optimization in Chronic Liver Disease Through Data Science and translational Innovation Severity of Liver Injury and Its Relation to Clinical Outcome and Duration of Hospitalization in COVID 19 Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1