Towards zero bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: investigating the impact of prophylactic tranexamic acid

Owaid M. Almalki
{"title":"Towards zero bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: investigating the impact of prophylactic tranexamic acid","authors":"Owaid M. Almalki","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a prevalent bariatric procedure known for its efficacy in weight loss and amelioration of obesity-related comorbidities. However, postoperative bleeding from the staple line remains a significant complication, necessitating strategies for effective hemostasis. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown promise in reducing bleeding complications in various surgical contexts, yet its role in LSG remains underexplored due to concerns about thromboembolic risks.\nMethods: This retrospective comparative analysis examines the impact of prophylactic TXA administration on perioperative bleeding in LSG patients. Two cohorts of 100 patients each, undergoing LSG before and after TXA implementation, were analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and statistically analyzed.\nResults: In our study, 100 patients received TXA with a mean age of 36.8±12.18 years, while another 100 formed the non-TXA group with a mean age of 37.2±11.81 years. Pre-surgery, clinical characteristics and hemodynamic parameters did not significantly differ between groups. However, post-surgery, TXA patients showed significantly elevated hemoglobin levels (p=0.019), increased hematocrit (p<0.001), higher prothrombin activity (p=0.002), decreased INR values (p=0.012), and higher fibrinogen levels (p=0.014) compared to non-TXA patients. Three non-TXA patients experienced post-operative bleeding requiring ICU admission and transfusions. The mean length of stay was 2.1±0.5 days for TXA patients and 2.2±0.03 days for non-TXA patients. No venous thromboembolism (VTE) or deaths occurred in either group.\nConclusions: The integration of prophylactic TXA into perioperative protocols for LSG holds promise in optimizing hemostasis and enhancing patient outcomes. TXA serves as a valuable adjunctive strategy towards minimizing bleeding events and bolstering safety in LSG procedures.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"48 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a prevalent bariatric procedure known for its efficacy in weight loss and amelioration of obesity-related comorbidities. However, postoperative bleeding from the staple line remains a significant complication, necessitating strategies for effective hemostasis. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown promise in reducing bleeding complications in various surgical contexts, yet its role in LSG remains underexplored due to concerns about thromboembolic risks. Methods: This retrospective comparative analysis examines the impact of prophylactic TXA administration on perioperative bleeding in LSG patients. Two cohorts of 100 patients each, undergoing LSG before and after TXA implementation, were analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: In our study, 100 patients received TXA with a mean age of 36.8±12.18 years, while another 100 formed the non-TXA group with a mean age of 37.2±11.81 years. Pre-surgery, clinical characteristics and hemodynamic parameters did not significantly differ between groups. However, post-surgery, TXA patients showed significantly elevated hemoglobin levels (p=0.019), increased hematocrit (p<0.001), higher prothrombin activity (p=0.002), decreased INR values (p=0.012), and higher fibrinogen levels (p=0.014) compared to non-TXA patients. Three non-TXA patients experienced post-operative bleeding requiring ICU admission and transfusions. The mean length of stay was 2.1±0.5 days for TXA patients and 2.2±0.03 days for non-TXA patients. No venous thromboembolism (VTE) or deaths occurred in either group. Conclusions: The integration of prophylactic TXA into perioperative protocols for LSG holds promise in optimizing hemostasis and enhancing patient outcomes. TXA serves as a valuable adjunctive strategy towards minimizing bleeding events and bolstering safety in LSG procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后实现零出血:研究预防性氨甲环酸的影响
背景:腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)是一种流行的减肥手术,因其在减轻体重和改善肥胖相关并发症方面的疗效而闻名。然而,术后缝合线出血仍是一个重要的并发症,需要采取有效的止血策略。氨甲环酸(TXA)在各种手术中都显示出减少出血并发症的前景,但由于担心血栓栓塞风险,其在全胃肠镜中的作用仍未得到充分探索:这项回顾性对比分析研究了预防性使用 TXA 对 LSG 患者围手术期出血的影响。分析了实施 TXA 之前和之后接受 LSG 的两组患者,每组 100 人。我们收集了人口统计学、临床和结果数据,并进行了统计分析:在我们的研究中,100 名患者接受了 TXA 治疗,平均年龄为(36.8±12.18)岁;另外 100 名患者组成了非 TXA 组,平均年龄为(37.2±11.81)岁。两组患者手术前的临床特征和血液动力学参数无明显差异。然而,与非 TXA 患者相比,手术后 TXA 患者的血红蛋白水平明显升高(p=0.019),血细胞比容升高(p<0.001),凝血酶原活动度升高(p=0.002),INR 值降低(p=0.012),纤维蛋白原水平升高(p=0.014)。三名非 TXA 患者术后出血,需要入住重症监护室和输血。TXA患者的平均住院时间为2.1±0.5天,非TXA患者的平均住院时间为2.2±0.03天。两组患者均未发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)或死亡:结论:将预防性 TXA 纳入 LSG 围手术期方案有望优化止血效果并改善患者预后。TXA是一种有价值的辅助策略,可最大限度地减少出血事件,提高LSG手术的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congenital hepatic hemangioma: a review Pelvic congestion syndrome and its treatment: topic review Giant pancreatic cyst with extension to spleen managed by laparoscopy Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, a rare mimic and important differential of iliopsoas abscess Cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter extrusion through the mouth in a child: a case report with brief literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1