A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Phytobiomes Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1094/pbiomes-07-23-0069-r
Mathilde Gorse, Lydie Kerdraon, Noémie Jacques, Angélique Gautier, Marie-Hélène Balesdent, Valérie Laval
{"title":"A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects","authors":"Mathilde Gorse, Lydie Kerdraon, Noémie Jacques, Angélique Gautier, Marie-Hélène Balesdent, Valérie Laval","doi":"10.1094/pbiomes-07-23-0069-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One important ecological question regarding the use of plant resistance genes against fungal pathogens concerns whether and how such resistance genes may modify pathogenic or beneficial members of the plant-associated microbiota. We studied the impact of a plant resistance gene by analyzing the mycobiota associated with Brassica napus organs over two cropping seasons. Sampling dates coincided with key stages of the life cycle of the B. napus pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. Leaf samples were collected at three time points in autumn and spring, and stem base samples were collected at two time points a few weeks before and at harvest. Stem residues, where L. maculans survives in the intercropping season and develops sexual reproduction, were also analyzed at four time points between the two cropping seasons. The sampling was performed on two plant genotypes, Darmor and Darmor- Rlm11, only differing by the effective resistance gene against L. maculans, Rlm11. Altogether, 419 samples were analyzed using two barcode: internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and Actin. The plant organ was shown to be the main mycobiota structuring factor, as clear-cut alternation of the species suggested that each plant organ represented a specific ecological niche. The cropping season and plant genotype also significantly influenced the community structure in lower proportions. The resistance gene contributed differently to the community structure depending on the year and the organ concerned. A significant but low impact of Rlm11 on other B. napus fungal pathogens was detected. The ITS and Actin barcodes showed similar results, but the species assignation was limited for the latter.","PeriodicalId":48504,"journal":{"name":"Phytobiomes Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytobiomes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-07-23-0069-r","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One important ecological question regarding the use of plant resistance genes against fungal pathogens concerns whether and how such resistance genes may modify pathogenic or beneficial members of the plant-associated microbiota. We studied the impact of a plant resistance gene by analyzing the mycobiota associated with Brassica napus organs over two cropping seasons. Sampling dates coincided with key stages of the life cycle of the B. napus pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. Leaf samples were collected at three time points in autumn and spring, and stem base samples were collected at two time points a few weeks before and at harvest. Stem residues, where L. maculans survives in the intercropping season and develops sexual reproduction, were also analyzed at four time points between the two cropping seasons. The sampling was performed on two plant genotypes, Darmor and Darmor- Rlm11, only differing by the effective resistance gene against L. maculans, Rlm11. Altogether, 419 samples were analyzed using two barcode: internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and Actin. The plant organ was shown to be the main mycobiota structuring factor, as clear-cut alternation of the species suggested that each plant organ represented a specific ecological niche. The cropping season and plant genotype also significantly influenced the community structure in lower proportions. The resistance gene contributed differently to the community structure depending on the year and the organ concerned. A significant but low impact of Rlm11 on other B. napus fungal pathogens was detected. The ITS and Actin barcodes showed similar results, but the species assignation was limited for the latter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与植物区系或种植季节的影响相比,Rlm11 对大斑纹锈病菌的特异性抗性基因对甘蓝型油菜霉菌生物群的影响有限
使用植物抗性基因对抗真菌病原体的一个重要生态问题是,这种抗性基因是否以及如何改变植物相关微生物群中的致病或有益成员。我们研究了植物抗性基因的影响,分析了两个种植季节中与甘蓝菜器官相关的霉菌生物群。取样日期与油菜病原菌大斑鳞霉菌生命周期的关键阶段相吻合。在秋季和春季的三个时间点采集叶片样本,在收获前几周和收获时的两个时间点采集茎基部样本。此外,还在两个种植季节之间的四个时间点对茎残留物进行了分析,茎残留物中的大斑锈菌在间作季节存活并进行有性生殖。取样是在两种植物基因型(Darmor 和 Darmor- Rlm11)上进行的,这两种基因型的区别仅在于对大斑叶蝇蛆的有效抗性基因 Rlm11。共使用两种条形码:内部转录间隔(ITS)和肌动蛋白分析了 419 个样本。结果表明,植物器官是构成真菌生物群的主要因素,因为物种的明显交替表明,每种植物器官都代表着特定的生态位。种植季节和植物基因型对群落结构也有显著影响,但所占比例较低。抗性基因对群落结构的影响因年份和相关器官而异。Rlm11 对其他油菜真菌病原体的影响很大,但程度较低。ITS 和 Actin 条形码显示了类似的结果,但后者的物种分配受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetically similar Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strains and associated phage display phenotypic and genotypic variation across 35 years Abiotic stress reorganizes rhizosphere and endosphere network structure of Sorghum bicolor A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects Fungal communities shift with soybean cyst nematode abundance in soils The root-endophytic microbiome shifts under drought in high-performing sorghum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1