Enhancing permeability prediction in tight and deep carbonate formations: new insights from pore description and electrical property using gene expression programming

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-11971-y
Alireza Rostami, Abbas Helalizadeh, Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam, Aboozar Soleymanzadeh
{"title":"Enhancing permeability prediction in tight and deep carbonate formations: new insights from pore description and electrical property using gene expression programming","authors":"Alireza Rostami,&nbsp;Abbas Helalizadeh,&nbsp;Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam,&nbsp;Aboozar Soleymanzadeh","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-11971-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of permeability in carbonate formations remains one of the main challenges in reservoir engineering. Existing literature predominantly utilizes total porosity as the sole input for characterizing permeability. However, the recognition of other influential parameters and their corresponding correlations is deemed important for enhancing accuracy, particularly in heterogeneous tight and deep carbonate formations. Despite progress, a universal, accurate, and straightforward approach for achieving this goal is still lacking. In this study, the advanced heuristic algorithm known as gene expression programming (GEP) is employed to estimate absolute permeability. An all-inclusive database that includes permeability, formation resistivity factor, total porosity, moldic porosity, interparticle porosity, and non-fabric-selective dissolution (connected) porosity is compiled from existing literature. Initially, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the key variables affecting permeability. Notably, the formation resistivity factor emerges as the most relevant variable on permeability prediction. Subsequently, the reliability of the database is assessed using Williams’ plot to detect outliers. After excluding the outlier data and considering the detected influential variable on permeability, multiple realizations of GEP modeling strategies are constructed. As a result, four GEP-derived symbolic equations are proposed. Statistical measures and graphical analyses demonstrate that GEP Model-IV provides the most accurate estimations, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.09, a determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) of 0.72, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.33. Furthermore, the accuracy of the proposed GEP Model-IV is verified by Williams’ plot, covering approximately 97.32% of the databank. Finally, it is recognized that considering pore description parameters enhances the accuracy of permeability estimation, particularly in studies characterizing carbonate reservoirs, especially when dealing with tight and deep formations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-11971-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of permeability in carbonate formations remains one of the main challenges in reservoir engineering. Existing literature predominantly utilizes total porosity as the sole input for characterizing permeability. However, the recognition of other influential parameters and their corresponding correlations is deemed important for enhancing accuracy, particularly in heterogeneous tight and deep carbonate formations. Despite progress, a universal, accurate, and straightforward approach for achieving this goal is still lacking. In this study, the advanced heuristic algorithm known as gene expression programming (GEP) is employed to estimate absolute permeability. An all-inclusive database that includes permeability, formation resistivity factor, total porosity, moldic porosity, interparticle porosity, and non-fabric-selective dissolution (connected) porosity is compiled from existing literature. Initially, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the key variables affecting permeability. Notably, the formation resistivity factor emerges as the most relevant variable on permeability prediction. Subsequently, the reliability of the database is assessed using Williams’ plot to detect outliers. After excluding the outlier data and considering the detected influential variable on permeability, multiple realizations of GEP modeling strategies are constructed. As a result, four GEP-derived symbolic equations are proposed. Statistical measures and graphical analyses demonstrate that GEP Model-IV provides the most accurate estimations, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.09, a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.72, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.33. Furthermore, the accuracy of the proposed GEP Model-IV is verified by Williams’ plot, covering approximately 97.32% of the databank. Finally, it is recognized that considering pore description parameters enhances the accuracy of permeability estimation, particularly in studies characterizing carbonate reservoirs, especially when dealing with tight and deep formations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强致密和深层碳酸盐岩层的渗透性预测:利用基因表达编程从孔隙描述和电特性中获得新见解
估算碳酸盐岩层的渗透率仍然是储层工程的主要挑战之一。现有文献主要将总孔隙度作为表征渗透率的唯一输入参数。然而,认识到其他影响参数及其相应的相关性对于提高准确性非常重要,尤其是在异质致密和深碳酸盐岩层中。尽管取得了一些进展,但实现这一目标的通用、准确和直接的方法仍然缺乏。在这项研究中,采用了一种称为基因表达编程(GEP)的先进启发式算法来估算绝对渗透率。从现有文献中整理出一个包罗万象的数据库,其中包括渗透率、地层电阻率因子、总孔隙度、模孔隙度、颗粒间孔隙度和非织物选择性溶解(连通)孔隙度。首先进行了敏感性分析,以确定影响渗透率的关键变量。值得注意的是,地层电阻率因子是与渗透率预测最相关的变量。随后,使用威廉姆斯图对数据库的可靠性进行评估,以检测异常值。在排除异常值数据并考虑检测到的对渗透率有影响的变量后,构建了多种 GEP 建模策略。因此,提出了四个 GEP 衍生符号方程。统计测量和图表分析表明,GEP 模型-IV 提供了最准确的估算,均方根误差 (RMSE) 为 1.09,判定系数 (R2) 为 0.72,平均绝对误差 (MAE) 为 1.33。此外,拟议的 GEP 模型-IV 的准确性得到了 Williams 图的验证,覆盖了约 97.32% 的数据库。最后,我们认识到,考虑孔隙描述参数可以提高渗透率估算的准确性,特别是在研究碳酸盐岩储层特征时,尤其是在处理致密和深层地层时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Paleocurrent analysis, provenance, and tectonic setting of the late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic sandstones from Fincha’a Valley, Blue Nile Basin, Northwestern Ethiopia Estimation of shoreline changes using digital shoreline analysis systems (DSAS 5.0) from Pondicherry to Point Calimere, Southeast Coast of India Heterogeneous crustal structures along the central dead sea fault system: evidence from seismic tomography A study of the reservoir fluid properties and phase behavior of Titas gas field Assessment of radon-222 levels in groundwater and drinking water and evaluation of health and environmental risks in Al-Baitha and surrounding areas southeast of Baghdad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1