Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence in counselling and psychotherapy training: A student stakeholder perspective—A pilot study

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/capr.12770
Stuart Gore, Emily Dove
{"title":"Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence in counselling and psychotherapy training: A student stakeholder perspective—A pilot study","authors":"Stuart Gore,&nbsp;Emily Dove","doi":"10.1002/capr.12770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study delves into the ethical considerations of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education, focusing on counselling and psychotherapy students' perspectives. Amidst growing interest in AI across educational sectors, this research aimed to highlight student views on the benefits, risks and ethical challenges posed by AI tools in their training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Employing a qualitative approach, this scoping study gathered data from seven counselling and psychotherapy students through an online survey, which were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Four main themes were constructed: (1) guidelines, (2) concerns about the use of AI with highly sensitive information, (3) acceptable and unacceptable uses, and (4) risk of AI compromising the quality of knowledge and practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This research underscores the necessity for collaborative guideline development that addresses ethical AI use, the protection of sensitive information, and the delineation of AI's appropriate roles in education and practice. It advocates for ongoing discussion amongst educational institutions, professional bodies and students to create dynamic, ethical standards that evolve with AI advancements, ensuring technology enhances learning outcomes, upholds integrity and respects privacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12770","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study delves into the ethical considerations of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education, focusing on counselling and psychotherapy students' perspectives. Amidst growing interest in AI across educational sectors, this research aimed to highlight student views on the benefits, risks and ethical challenges posed by AI tools in their training.

Methods

Employing a qualitative approach, this scoping study gathered data from seven counselling and psychotherapy students through an online survey, which were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Findings

Four main themes were constructed: (1) guidelines, (2) concerns about the use of AI with highly sensitive information, (3) acceptable and unacceptable uses, and (4) risk of AI compromising the quality of knowledge and practice.

Conclusion

This research underscores the necessity for collaborative guideline development that addresses ethical AI use, the protection of sensitive information, and the delineation of AI's appropriate roles in education and practice. It advocates for ongoing discussion amongst educational institutions, professional bodies and students to create dynamic, ethical standards that evolve with AI advancements, ensuring technology enhances learning outcomes, upholds integrity and respects privacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在咨询和心理治疗培训中使用人工智能的伦理考虑:学生利益相关者视角--试点研究
本研究深入探讨了在高等教育中使用人工智能(AI)的伦理问题,重点关注咨询和心理治疗专业学生的观点。本研究采用定性方法,通过在线调查收集了七名心理咨询与心理治疗专业学生的数据,并使用反思性主题分析法对这些数据进行了分析。本研究强调了合作制定指导方针的必要性,这些指导方针涉及人工智能的道德使用、敏感信息的保护以及人工智能在教育和实践中的适当作用。该研究提倡教育机构、专业团体和学生之间持续开展讨论,以创建动态的道德标准,并随着人工智能的进步而不断发展,确保技术能够提高学习成果、维护诚信和尊重隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Collaboration with clients to create journal notes: A mixed methods evaluation of a pilot intervention study in a municipality mental health services team Reflections from LGBTQIA+ individuals of their past experiences of psychotherapy and counselling and the use of creative therapy—A qualitative study Effects of a muscle relaxation exercise programme on test anxiety and sleep quality among fourth-year nursing students before comprehensive examination in Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1