Silicon extraction from x-ray amorphous soil constituents: a method comparison of alkaline extracting agents

Mathias Stein, Daniel Puppe, D. Kaczorek, Christian Buhtz, Jörg Schaller
{"title":"Silicon extraction from x-ray amorphous soil constituents: a method comparison of alkaline extracting agents","authors":"Mathias Stein, Daniel Puppe, D. Kaczorek, Christian Buhtz, Jörg Schaller","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing interest in amorphous silica (ASi) within the fields of soil science and ecology underscores the necessity for a reliable protocol to estimate ASi contents in soil. Alkaline wet chemical extraction methods are commonly employed for silicon (Si) extraction from operationally defined (x-ray) amorphous Si phases or short-range ordered mineral phases in soils and marine sediments. In our study we conducted a comparative analysis of four alkaline extraction methods (1% sodium carbonate, 0.5 M sodium carbonate, 0.2 M sodium hydroxide, and 0.1 M Tiron), assessing their extraction selectivity as well as effectiveness using soils artificially enriched with varying, defined amounts of ASi. While extraction effectiveness was evaluated by determining the recovery rate of initially added ASi, extraction selectivity was determined by measuring aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) concentrations as indicators of the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Microwave plasma atom emission spectrometry was used to analyze Al, Fe, and Si concentrations in the extracts. Our results indicate that extraction with 0.2 M sodium hydroxide yields the best outcomes in terms of both extraction effectiveness and selectivity. This more recent extraction technique is conducted at the most alkaline pH (13.3) of all four methods tested, but at ambient temperature (21°C) decreasing the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Though, no wet-chemical extraction used on heterogeneous samples like soil is precisely selective, and thus able to quantify the target analyte only. Hence, data obtained by such procedures still need to be interpreted with caution considering all their limitations.","PeriodicalId":509564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing interest in amorphous silica (ASi) within the fields of soil science and ecology underscores the necessity for a reliable protocol to estimate ASi contents in soil. Alkaline wet chemical extraction methods are commonly employed for silicon (Si) extraction from operationally defined (x-ray) amorphous Si phases or short-range ordered mineral phases in soils and marine sediments. In our study we conducted a comparative analysis of four alkaline extraction methods (1% sodium carbonate, 0.5 M sodium carbonate, 0.2 M sodium hydroxide, and 0.1 M Tiron), assessing their extraction selectivity as well as effectiveness using soils artificially enriched with varying, defined amounts of ASi. While extraction effectiveness was evaluated by determining the recovery rate of initially added ASi, extraction selectivity was determined by measuring aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) concentrations as indicators of the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Microwave plasma atom emission spectrometry was used to analyze Al, Fe, and Si concentrations in the extracts. Our results indicate that extraction with 0.2 M sodium hydroxide yields the best outcomes in terms of both extraction effectiveness and selectivity. This more recent extraction technique is conducted at the most alkaline pH (13.3) of all four methods tested, but at ambient temperature (21°C) decreasing the dissolution of non-target mineral phases. Though, no wet-chemical extraction used on heterogeneous samples like soil is precisely selective, and thus able to quantify the target analyte only. Hence, data obtained by such procedures still need to be interpreted with caution considering all their limitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 X 射线无定形土壤成分中提取硅:碱性提取剂的方法比较
土壤科学和生态学领域对无定形二氧化硅(ASi)的兴趣与日俱增,这突出表明有必要制定一个可靠的方案来估算土壤中的 ASi 含量。碱性湿化学萃取法通常用于从土壤和海洋沉积物中操作定义(X 射线)的无定形硅相或短程有序矿物相中提取硅(Si)。在我们的研究中,我们对四种碱性萃取方法(1% 碳酸钠、0.5 M 碳酸钠、0.2 M 氢氧化钠和 0.1 M 铁)进行了比较分析,使用人工添加了不同数量的 ASi 的土壤评估了它们的萃取选择性和有效性。萃取效果是通过测定初始添加的 ASi 的回收率来评估的,而萃取选择性则是通过测量铝(Al)和铁(Fe)的浓度来确定的,铝(Al)和铁(Fe)浓度是非目标矿物相溶解的指标。微波等离子体原子发射光谱法用于分析提取物中铝、铁和硅的浓度。我们的研究结果表明,使用 0.2 M 氢氧化钠进行萃取,在萃取效果和选择性方面都能获得最佳结果。这种最新的萃取技术是在所有四种测试方法中碱性最强的 pH 值(13.3)下进行的,但其环境温度(21°C)降低了非目标矿物相的溶解度。不过,在土壤等异质样品上使用的湿化学萃取法没有精确的选择性,因此只能对目标分析物进行定量。因此,考虑到这些程序的局限性,在解释这些程序获得的数据时仍需谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Co-creating knowledge for community resilience to sustainability challenges Synergic effect of thermo-chemical pretreatment of waste-activated sludge on bio-methane enhancement Institutional pressure and low carbon innovation policy: the role of EMS, environmental interpretations and governance heterogeneity Environmental liability insurance, green innovation, and mediation effect study Can urbanization improve carbon performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1