Are we tackle ready? Cross-sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union

Kathryn Dane, Stephen W. West, Sharief Hendricks, Ciaran Simms, Nicol van Dyk, Will Connors, Fiona Wilson
{"title":"Are we tackle ready? Cross-sectional video analysis of match tackle characteristics in elite women's Rugby Union","authors":"Kathryn Dane,&nbsp;Stephen W. West,&nbsp;Sharief Hendricks,&nbsp;Ciaran Simms,&nbsp;Nicol van Dyk,&nbsp;Will Connors,&nbsp;Fiona Wilson","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The tackle contest is the most common and most injurious match contact event in rugby and is an indicator of performance. <i>Tackle Ready</i> is World Rugby's tackle technique education program. Limited research has characterized the tackle contest in women's rugby. The purpose of this study is to: (1) identify the match situational characteristics, ball-carrier and tackler technical actions demonstrated in elite women's Rugby Union and (2) to determine the extent to which <i>Tackle Ready</i> recommended tackle techniques were exhibited. Technical characteristics for 1500 tackle events in the 2022–2023 Women's Six Nations Championship were visually assessed according to a predefined coding framework and the <i>Tackle Ready</i> program. Tackles lacked full completion (0.2%) of the 22 coded <i>Tackle Ready</i> techniques with 47% of the recommended techniques demonstrated in each tackle on average (range 15%–98%). A high proportion of tackles involved two defenders (48%), approaching ball-carriers from the side (38%) or oblique angles (39%), in an upright position (30%), and with initial contact made with the arm (51%). Incorrect pre-contact head positioning and head placement upon contact accounted for 50% and 15% of tackles, respectively, and there was a mean of 14 (95% CI 11–18) head and neck contacts to a tackler and 18 (95% CI 14–22) head and neck contacts to a ball-carrier per game. Targeted interventions to encourage adoption of recommended techniques are needed to reduce tackle-related injury risk in women's rugby. This study provides valuable context for future discussion across law enforcement, coach education and gender-specific tackle coaching in the women's game.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tackle contest is the most common and most injurious match contact event in rugby and is an indicator of performance. Tackle Ready is World Rugby's tackle technique education program. Limited research has characterized the tackle contest in women's rugby. The purpose of this study is to: (1) identify the match situational characteristics, ball-carrier and tackler technical actions demonstrated in elite women's Rugby Union and (2) to determine the extent to which Tackle Ready recommended tackle techniques were exhibited. Technical characteristics for 1500 tackle events in the 2022–2023 Women's Six Nations Championship were visually assessed according to a predefined coding framework and the Tackle Ready program. Tackles lacked full completion (0.2%) of the 22 coded Tackle Ready techniques with 47% of the recommended techniques demonstrated in each tackle on average (range 15%–98%). A high proportion of tackles involved two defenders (48%), approaching ball-carriers from the side (38%) or oblique angles (39%), in an upright position (30%), and with initial contact made with the arm (51%). Incorrect pre-contact head positioning and head placement upon contact accounted for 50% and 15% of tackles, respectively, and there was a mean of 14 (95% CI 11–18) head and neck contacts to a tackler and 18 (95% CI 14–22) head and neck contacts to a ball-carrier per game. Targeted interventions to encourage adoption of recommended techniques are needed to reduce tackle-related injury risk in women's rugby. This study provides valuable context for future discussion across law enforcement, coach education and gender-specific tackle coaching in the women's game.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们做好擒抱准备了吗?对精英女子橄榄球联盟比赛擒抱特点的横截面视频分析
擒抱比赛是橄榄球比赛中最常见、伤害最大的比赛接触项目,也是衡量比赛成绩的一项指标。Tackle Ready 是世界橄榄球协会的擒抱技术教育计划。对女子橄榄球擒抱比赛特点的研究有限。本研究的目的是:(1) 确定精英女子橄榄球联盟中的比赛情况特征、持球人和擒抱人的技术动作,(2) 确定 Tackle Ready 推荐的擒抱技术的表现程度。根据预定义的编码框架和 Tackle Ready 计划,对 2022-2023 年女子六国锦标赛中 1500 次擒抱的技术特征进行了目测评估。擒抱动作没有完全完成(0.2%)22 项编码的 "擒抱就绪 "技术,平均每个擒抱动作展示了 47% 的推荐技术(范围在 15%-98% 之间)。较高比例的擒抱涉及两名防守者(48%)、从侧面(38%)或斜角(39%)接近持球者、采取直立姿势(30%)以及用手臂进行初步接触(51%)。在每场比赛中,擒抱者的头部和颈部平均有 14 次(95% CI 11-18 次)与持球者的头部和颈部接触,而持球者的头部和颈部平均有 18 次(95% CI 14-22 次)与擒抱者的头部和颈部接触。需要采取有针对性的干预措施,鼓励采用推荐的技术,以降低女子橄榄球比赛中与擒抱相关的受伤风险。这项研究为今后讨论女子橄榄球比赛中的执法、教练教育和针对不同性别的擒抱教练提供了宝贵的背景资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's rugby as a catalyst for advancing female-specific science and safety in sport. Case study of a world hour record simulation in an elite cyclist: Insight into task failure. Psychological and social factors associated with mental health of European dual career athletes: A systematic review. The effectiveness of cryostimulation exposure on sleep and recovery in male athletes: Timing considerations. The effects of plyometric versus resistance training on running economy and 5-km running time in middle-aged recreational runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1